Opponent - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: opponent Page 1 of about 300 results (0.108 seconds)Ramesh Vs. M/S. Scoda Auto India Pvt.Ltd. and Others
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
..... is manufacturing defect in the vehicle cannot be sustained it is further submitted that as opponents replaced the machatronics with software the complainant bent upon to take disadvantage of this fact ..... issued by the complainant thus on any count the contention of the complainant that the opponents committed deficiency in service is being unfounded cannot be sustained we therefore record our negative .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeelam Arvind Shah and Others Vs. Mohammed Azam Qureshi and Others
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... into an mou on 1st march 2003 with the opponents and thereby opponents agreed to sell assign and transfer flat no 602 ..... the complaint as they have been unnecessarily joined as opponents 7 opponents had filed written version both parties were directed to ..... favour of the complainants to file present complaint against the opponents they pleaded that complaint is absolutely barred by limitation because .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Sabitri @ Savitri Agarwal Vs. Tata Memorial Hospital Dr. Ernest B ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... or deficiency in service on the part of both opponents the opponents denied basic allegation of the complainant that she suffered ..... received only one cycle of chemotherapy according to the opponents the opponent no 1 hospital is an advanced research centre in ..... effects of contracting tuberculosis as alleged by the complainant the opponents also pleaded that the complainant had not adduced medical .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Balasaheb Ramchandra Gaikwad Vs. Icici Prudential Life Insurance C ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... be terminated so prima facie there is deficiency in service on the part of the opponent the opponent is not only deficient in rendering service to the complainant but it also amounts ..... complainant has challenged however no explanation has been given regarding this tele conversation by the opponent similarly there is no explanation regarding alleged technical error while calculating the premium .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTilak Nagar Royal Co.Operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. M/S. Vinayak C ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... membership of mhada was not paid to mhada by opponent but the opponent is trying to show the said payment by referring ..... permissions from the various authorities 10 complainant prayed that the opponents be directed to get occupation certificate from concerned authorities ..... with the possession without waiting for occupation certificate and hence opponents are not liable to pay excess water charges and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShanti Thallapali and Another Vs. Surana Sethia Hospital and Another
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... bowels obstruction in her abdominal cavity was noticed dr nayak discussed the matter with opponent no 2 opponent no 2 suggested an immediate surgery on 04 05 2009 complainant no 1 was ..... traumatized by this sordid episode both complainants are consumers services provided by the opponents are deficient opponents are jointly and severally liable for deficiency of service and negligence therefore .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCotmac Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Mohammad Muzaffar and Another
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... thus could not be attributed to any defect in the machine per se claimed the opponent opponent therefore pleaded that complaint should be dismissed with costs 7 both parties adduced documentary ..... purpose and therefore district forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint 6 opponent denied that opponent had made any offer for supply of aqua gas generator to the complainant complainant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelux Builders Through Surekha Pradeep Shah and Another Vs. SachIn Shi ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
..... complaint filed by the respondent original complainant written version filed by the appellant original opponent affidavit in rejoinder filed by the respondent original complainant evidence adduced on affidavits ..... of registered reconstituted partnership deed hence the contention of the appellant original opponent that the loan proposal of the respondent original complainant was sanctioned but the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStaywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd Vs. Starwood Hotels and Resorts Wor ...
Court: Singapore Supreme Court
..... inc sheraton and starwood hotels and resorts worldwide inc starwood collectively the opponents the opponents opposed the application the application made by staywell hospitality park regis group ..... dissected the marks and analysed their components discretely in considering their distinctiveness the opponents response was that the judge did consider the marks holistically but was entitled .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTao, Hsiu-chih Vs. Opposition thereto by Pirelli and C. S.P.A.
Court: Singapore Supreme Court
..... present opposition proceedings the undisputed burden of proof in the present case falls on the opponents background 9 the applicant is the proprietor of a taiwanese incorporated company csl sunmaster ..... european and australian registrations were obtained after the applicant successfully resisted opposition from the opponents in these jurisdictions the same mark has been filed in the same classes ie .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial