Court : Karnataka
..... d. complex, jaladarshini layout, new bel road bangalore - 560 054 rep. by director. 2 . prakaash kumar singh s/o satya brat singh aged about43years managing director soverign developers and infrastructure ltd., (a company incorporated under the companies act1956 having its principal place of38business at # 16 and172nd floor s.d. complex, jaladarshini layout new bel road, ..... /5(p) and 40/8 of idya village, mangalore taluk measuring 19 cents which is a 88 non-agricultural property in the year 2012 and the mineral water plant is not sold and the petitioner is no way concerned with the transactions of sri.dyana antony paul and others and petitioner has been wrongly ..... only the provisional attachment order that is going to be passed by the adjudicating authority and confiscation of the same would lie to the special court. thus, area of consideration of confiscation is totally changed post 15.02.2013. hence, 76 he would contend that if an applicant is going before the adjudicating authority with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... d. complex, jaladarshini layout, new bel road bangalore - 560 054 rep. by director. 2 . prakaash kumar singh s/o satya brat singh aged about43years managing director soverign developers and infrastructure ltd., (a company incorporated under the companies act1956 having its principal place of38business at # 16 and172nd floor s.d. complex, jaladarshini layout new bel road, ..... /5(p) and 40/8 of idya village, mangalore taluk measuring 19 cents which is a 88 non-agricultural property in the year 2012 and the mineral water plant is not sold and the petitioner is no way concerned with the transactions of sri.dyana antony paul and others and petitioner has been wrongly ..... only the provisional attachment order that is going to be passed by the adjudicating authority and confiscation of the same would lie to the special court. thus, area of consideration of confiscation is totally changed post 15.02.2013. hence, 76 he would contend that if an applicant is going before the adjudicating authority with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... d. complex, jaladarshini layout, new bel road bangalore - 560 054 rep. by director. 2 . prakaash kumar singh s/o satya brat singh aged about43years managing director soverign developers and infrastructure ltd., (a company incorporated under the companies act1956 having its principal place of38business at # 16 and172nd floor s.d. complex, jaladarshini layout new bel road, ..... /5(p) and 40/8 of idya village, mangalore taluk measuring 19 cents which is a 88 non-agricultural property in the year 2012 and the mineral water plant is not sold and the petitioner is no way concerned with the transactions of sri.dyana antony paul and others and petitioner has been wrongly ..... only the provisional attachment order that is going to be passed by the adjudicating authority and confiscation of the same would lie to the special court. thus, area of consideration of confiscation is totally changed post 15.02.2013. hence, 76 he would contend that if an applicant is going before the adjudicating authority with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... d. complex, jaladarshini layout, new bel road bangalore - 560 054 rep. by director. 2 . prakaash kumar singh s/o satya brat singh aged about43years managing director soverign developers and infrastructure ltd., (a company incorporated under the companies act1956 having its principal place of38business at # 16 and172nd floor s.d. complex, jaladarshini layout new bel road, ..... /5(p) and 40/8 of idya village, mangalore taluk measuring 19 cents which is a 88 non-agricultural property in the year 2012 and the mineral water plant is not sold and the petitioner is no way concerned with the transactions of sri.dyana antony paul and others and petitioner has been wrongly ..... only the provisional attachment order that is going to be passed by the adjudicating authority and confiscation of the same would lie to the special court. thus, area of consideration of confiscation is totally changed post 15.02.2013. hence, 76 he would contend that if an applicant is going before the adjudicating authority with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... d. complex, jaladarshini layout, new bel road bangalore - 560 054 rep. by director. 2 . prakaash kumar singh s/o satya brat singh aged about43years managing director soverign developers and infrastructure ltd., (a company incorporated under the companies act1956 having its principal place of38business at # 16 and172nd floor s.d. complex, jaladarshini layout new bel road, ..... /5(p) and 40/8 of idya village, mangalore taluk measuring 19 cents which is a 88 non-agricultural property in the year 2012 and the mineral water plant is not sold and the petitioner is no way concerned with the transactions of sri.dyana antony paul and others and petitioner has been wrongly ..... only the provisional attachment order that is going to be passed by the adjudicating authority and confiscation of the same would lie to the special court. thus, area of consideration of confiscation is totally changed post 15.02.2013. hence, 76 he would contend that if an applicant is going before the adjudicating authority with .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... prior to uma devi, relying upon the decision of this court in daily rated casual labour vs. union of india [1988 (1) scc122, bhagwati prasad vs. delhi state mineral development corporation [1990 (1) scc361 and dharwad district pwd literate dalit wage employees association vs. state of karnataka [1990 (2) scc396. these directions were considered, explained and in ..... clean the kerbs and scrub the medians on regular basis; g. collect and transport construction debris, loose stones and other such small quantities from its source to low lying areas identified by cmc; or as per direction of cmc. h. collect msw from the bulk generators in a segregated manner (wet and dry) and transport the same ..... done by pourakarmikas. 13.7. a pourakarmika by very definition would mean a person who deals with municipal solid waste and/or cleaning activities of that particular area. it may be that there is lot of cleaning to be done one day and another day lesser cleaning to be done, but that does not deviate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... the offences punishable under sections 409 and 420 read with section 120b ipc, sections 21 and 23 read with sections 4(1) and 4(1) (a) of the mines and mineral (development and regulation) act, 1957 and rule 165 read with rule 144 of the karnataka forest rules, 1969. the said decision will not help the petitioner as facts and issues of ..... referred to rule of judicial precedents and doctrine of stare decisis. the hon'ble supreme court has also explained the certainty, stability and continuity of judicial precedents as basis for development of rule of law.44. further, the learned counsel relied upon the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of official liquidator v. dayanand and others reported .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... under the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, for short mmrd act of 1957. ii) one b.n.shankar singh was granted a lease to mine iron ore in 200 acres in sy.no.1 of vyasanakere village, for 29 years, in m.l.2068 under lease deed 13.10.1958. that area, allegedly is the northern ..... the area from which the defendants were lawfully evicted on 1999. ii written statement: i) the plaintiffs averments are denied, while not admitting that k.narayanaiah was granted lease of land by the madras government and a notification issued sanctioning mining lease over 858 acres without executing a lease deed under the mines and minerals (development and ..... regulation) act, 1947 r/w mineral concession rules 1949 though the application for mining lease was for 120 acres each in sy.nos.4, 5, and 6 and 300 acres .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... petitioners in these writ petitions are either lease holders of mines and quarries in forest areas; purchasers of minerals as a forest produce from the lease holders or from the state government or corporation, owned or controlled by the state government; public sector units such as national mineral development corporation (nmdc), state trading corporation (stc) or steel authority of india limited (sail). thus, the ..... is subject to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development. no such limitation is imposed under mmdr act, relating to levy of fdt which is infact, relatable to entry 54 of list ii (i) in hingir-rampur coal company ltd., the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952, which imposed a cess, was upheld due to certain reasons as narrated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... petitioners in these writ petitions are either lease holders of mines and quarries in forest areas; purchasers of minerals as a forest produce from the lease holders or from the state government or corporation, owned or controlled by the state government; public sector units such as national mineral development corporation (nmdc), state trading corporation (stc) or steel authority of india limited (sail). thus, the ..... is subject to any limitations imposed by parliament by law relating to mineral development. no such limitation is imposed under mmdr act, relating to levy of fdt which is infact, relatable to entry 54 of list ii (i) in hingir-rampur coal company ltd., the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952, which imposed a cess, was upheld due to certain reasons as -:329 .....
Tag this Judgment!