Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: offshore areas mineral development and regulation act 2002 chapter ii general provisions for acquition of operating rights in the offshore areas Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 290 results (0.133 seconds)

Bharath Gold Mines Ltd. by Its Managing Director Vs. the Industrial Cr ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(6)AIRKarR477

..... the first case, the matter pertained to renewal of mining lease in the interest of mineral development with regard to chromite mines. in orissa and in the second case the formation of a new railway zone to meet the demands of backward areas the government had to take a decision to create six new railway zones. the ..... is not necessary to call for global bids, it is necessary to take into consideration the report of the sub-group-ii on mineral out put industries of the working group on mineral exploration and development (other than coal and lignite) for the 11th rive year plan under the aegis of the planning commission of india wherein it ..... the charge of the court and the court's permission was not obtained for giving the land on lease; ii) the leased land is the main potential area being fully mineralized; and iii) the two workshops are vital for revival. the matter is in court and the court's decision will be binding on the successful bidder .....

Chikkusappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ64

..... erstwhile old mysore area and such lands which are described as patta lands and the owners of such lands being also known as 'pattadars'.2. it is the admitted position that all petitioners are carrying on quarrying activities which does amount to mining operation as understood under the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) ..... the petitioners in mining operations which is an activity exclusively within the domain of the central government and covered by the central legislation, namely, mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and therefore any interference or action on the part of the state authorities for curtailing or denying the rights of the ..... legislative competence to regulate the activity of mining either by making any law or by an executive action; that the field of subject of mining and mineral development is a subject which comes within the scope of entry 54 of list i of seventh schedule of the constitution of india; that the union .....

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

..... petition] informing the general public that the areas mentioned in the annexure to the notification are available for regrant under rule 59 of the mineral concession rules, 1960 [for short, the rules]; that such an application will be considered in accordance with the provisions of the mines and minerals (development & regulation) act, 1957 [for short, ..... the act] and the rules and subject to the compliance of all requirements of this act and the rules and other statutory powers and advising the interested persons to inspect the area and satisfy themselves about the availability of mineral deposits and to apply ..... conserving the forest growth or need for examining the competition between conservation of the existing forest vis--vis development activity by carrying out mining operations in the area to extract the ore and to produce mineral out of the ore. now such an understanding is clearly in the teeth of the law as .....

Junjamma and ors. Vs. the Bangalore Development Authority, Rep. by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR608; 2004(7)KarLJ677

..... decision has to be held as arbitrary and discriminatory. it is relevant to note here that the acquisition of the lands is for the purpose of planned development of the area which includes both residential and commercial purposes. that being the purpose of acquisition, it is difficult to accept the case of the state government that certain ..... in section 15, which empowers the authority, to acquire, hold, manage and dispose of the property within or outside the bangalore metropolitan area, to promote and secure the development of bangalore metropolitan area, to hold that the 'development scheme' to be drawn up or prepared by the authority under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 15 of ..... ........... clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 15 of the bda act deals with the drawing up of the scheme by the authority for the development of the metropolitan area. clause (b) of section 15(1) of the bda act, has two parts; the first part deals with the prior approval of the government for the .....

Smt. C.V. Shantha W/O N.P. Muddalingaiah and ors. Vs. the State of Kar ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(5)KarLJ361

..... kar 1072 has no application to the case on hand. in the said case, the land was acquired for the purpose of formation of industrial area under the provisions of karnataka industrial areas development act 1966. in the said matter, the division bench of this court took the view that industry should not be established in the lands abutting ..... of 'bda act' contemplate the manner in which the scheme is to be prepared by the bda. this pre-proposes that the bda will have to plan the development of area by getting approval of the scheme as contemplated under the act prior to issuance of notification under section 17(1) of the act and that the bda has to ..... in the authority as per clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 15 of the 'bda act' to draw up development scheme/improvement scheme not only in the area within the bangalore metropolitan area, but also for area adjacent to it. when section 14 of the 'bda act' explicitly provides for acquiring, holding, managing and disposing of properties which .....

Veerappa Vs. The Range Forest Officer

Court : Karnataka

..... yathish j nadiga, advocate) and:252. 1 . the state of karnataka represented by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bangalore-560001 2 . the panchayath development officer mudugodu grama panchayati, mudugodu-577144 lakkavalli hobli, tarikere taluk chickmagalur district-577101 3 . suresha s/o late seetharamaiah, aged about45years, employee, irrigation department, ..... granted 2 acres each to carry out quarrying in sy.no.224/p1 at daddigatta (bettadahalli), shravanabelagola hobli, chennarayapatna taluk under karnataka minor mineral concession rules. this is borne by the voluminous records produced by the petitioners, which fact is also admitted by the special court itself ..... and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. third, but related, where a vague statute 'abut(s) upon sensitive areas of basic first amendment freedoms,' it 'operates to inhibit the exercise of (those) freedoms'. uncertain meanings inevitably lead citizens to '"steer far wider .....

Iae International Aero Engines Ag Vs. United Breweries(holdings) Limit ...

Court : Karnataka

..... co.p.no.57/2012 & connected matters iae international aero engines ag and others vs.united breweries (holdings) limited 216/244 possible loss on account of this development has not been recognized in the financial statements (refer note 42 to financial statements). an amount of `8,074 million is shown as dues from a contributory ..... of the government and my own. the indian economy has slowed considerably with growth forecasts now pegged at 7.5% of gdp. certainly better than most developed economies but disappointing given our own expectations, and the inevitable comparison with china. the indian currency is in free fall against the usd and has depreciated ..... commerce a body corporate, constituted under the banking, companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1980 and having its corporate office at plot no.5, institutional area, sector 32 gurgaon, haryana and a branch known as large corporate branch, the land mark #21/15, m.g. road, bangalore 560001 represented by its assistant .....

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... yathish j nadiga, advocate) and:252. 1 . the state of karnataka represented by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bangalore-560001 2 . the panchayath development officer mudugodu grama panchayati, mudugodu-577144 lakkavalli hobli, tarikere taluk chickmagalur district-577101 3 . suresha s/o late seetharamaiah, aged about45years, employee, irrigation department, ..... granted 2 acres each to carry out quarrying in sy.no.224/p1 at daddigatta (bettadahalli), shravanabelagola hobli, chennarayapatna taluk under karnataka minor mineral concession rules. this is borne by the voluminous records produced by the petitioners, which fact is also admitted by the special court itself ..... and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. third, but related, where a vague statute 'abut(s) upon sensitive areas of basic first amendment freedoms,' it 'operates to inhibit the exercise of (those) freedoms'. uncertain meanings inevitably lead citizens to '"steer far wider .....

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... yathish j nadiga, advocate) and:252. 1 . the state of karnataka represented by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bangalore-560001 2 . the panchayath development officer mudugodu grama panchayati, mudugodu-577144 lakkavalli hobli, tarikere taluk chickmagalur district-577101 3 . suresha s/o late seetharamaiah, aged about45years, employee, irrigation department, ..... granted 2 acres each to carry out quarrying in sy.no.224/p1 at daddigatta (bettadahalli), shravanabelagola hobli, chennarayapatna taluk under karnataka minor mineral concession rules. this is borne by the voluminous records produced by the petitioners, which fact is also admitted by the special court itself ..... and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. third, but related, where a vague statute 'abut(s) upon sensitive areas of basic first amendment freedoms,' it 'operates to inhibit the exercise of (those) freedoms'. uncertain meanings inevitably lead citizens to '"steer far wider .....

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... yathish j nadiga, advocate) and:252. 1 . the state of karnataka represented by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bangalore-560001 2 . the panchayath development officer mudugodu grama panchayati, mudugodu-577144 lakkavalli hobli, tarikere taluk chickmagalur district-577101 3 . suresha s/o late seetharamaiah, aged about45years, employee, irrigation department, ..... granted 2 acres each to carry out quarrying in sy.no.224/p1 at daddigatta (bettadahalli), shravanabelagola hobli, chennarayapatna taluk under karnataka minor mineral concession rules. this is borne by the voluminous records produced by the petitioners, which fact is also admitted by the special court itself ..... and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. third, but related, where a vague statute 'abut(s) upon sensitive areas of basic first amendment freedoms,' it 'operates to inhibit the exercise of (those) freedoms'. uncertain meanings inevitably lead citizens to '"steer far wider .....