Occupancy - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: occupancy Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 211 results (0.018 seconds)Central Union Tel. Co. Vs. City of Edwardsville
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-23-1925
pole upon every person firm or corporation owning controlling or occupying any such poles in the streets of edwardsville the city
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Rani) Prayag Kumari Debi and ors. Vs. Siva Prosad Singh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-17-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Cal1
not disturb the plaintiffs residing in the house they are occupying until the final disposal of the case 248 the plaintiffs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHemanta Kumar Roy and ors. Vs. Meser Bibi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-09-1925
Reported in: 95Ind.Cas.984
if the landlord failed to prove that the tenant was occupying more lands than he was paying rent for by encroaching
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShaikh Garib Haji Vs. Muchiram Shau and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-22-1925
Reported in: AIR1925Cal1020
or altogether 3 the facts show that they were admittedly occupying a pachai shop for about three years and that upon
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRama Raja thevar Vs. Papammal and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-03-1925
Reported in: AIR1925Mad1230; 90Ind.Cas.983; (1925)49MLJ348
if she persists in living in the larger bungalow and occupying the whole of it the allowance of rs 100 per
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalap Nath Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-01-1925
Reported in: AIR1926All288; 92Ind.Cas.591a
i suggesting that he was in any way justified in occupying a part of the public ground in the way he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Tajammul HusaIn Vs. Banwari Lal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-19-1925
Reported in: AIR1926All43
by no means conclusive particularly as the raiyats and other occupiers of houses are not parties thereto 5 in this case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Munshi) Shib Ram Vs. Faqira and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-06-1925
Reported in: AIR1925All705
suits are brought on the allegation that a certain person occupying a certain property is a tenant of the plaintiff and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNathu Mal Vs. Emperor
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-07-1925
Reported in: AIR1925All309
j that it must be established that the owner or occupier takes a fixed commission which is irrespective of the result
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaung Bya Vs. Maung Kyi Neo
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-30-1925
Reported in: (1925)27BOMLR1427
east side of the embankment the plaintiff was a farmer occupying lands on the north west side the lower side of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial