Obstructive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: obstructive Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 130 results (0.009 seconds)B. Janaradhana Bhat Vs. Lalitha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-08-1983
Reported in: AIR1984Kant120
..... order 21 rules 97 101 103 a n venugopal gowda j obstruction to execution of a decree questions to be determined by the ..... when a person claiming title to the property in his possession obstructing the attempt by the decree holder to dispossess him form the ..... is competent to consider all questions raised by the person offering obstruction against execution of the decree and pass appropriate orders as per .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.S. Manjunathaiah and anr. Vs. M.V. Nanjundaiah and K.S.R.T.C.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-03-1983
Reported in: 1(1985)ACC19
..... order 21 rules 97 101 103 a n venugopal gowda j obstruction to execution of a decree questions to be determined by the ..... when a person claiming title to the property in his possession obstructing the attempt by the decree holder to dispossess him form the ..... is competent to consider all questions raised by the person offering obstruction against execution of the decree and pass appropriate orders as per .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.K. Jha and anr. Vs. Vice-chancellor, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Ne ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-23-1983
Reported in: AIR1983SC1128; 1983(2)SCALE396; (1984)1SCC119; 1984(16)LC57(SC)
..... such as urgency where the obligation to give notice and opportunity to be heard would obstruct the taking of prompt action of a preventive or remedial nature audi alteram partem rule ..... as indeed it is used more often than not to protect vested interests and to obstruct the path of progressive change the time has come to make an appropriate distinction between .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.P. Scheduled Tribes Cooperative Finance and Development Corporation ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-20-1983
Reported in: AIR1983SC1290; 1983(2)SCALE309; (1983)4SCC466
..... maharana before the day of april 1st 1948 would be questioned after merger there was obstruction by the forest officers when the respondents were cutting the forests but after some correspondence ..... june 1948 by executive action and that the government of bombay was not competent to obstruct them in the exercise of those rights their claims were opposed by the state of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRahmania Trading Company Reptd., by Mohammed Yacob Vs. M.K. Pandarinat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-19-1983
Reported in: (1984)2MLJ251
..... 14 of 1982 against rahmania trading company for removal of obstruction in the course of the delivery proceedings in the counter ..... not entitled to remain in possession and the removal of obstruction should be ordered rahmania trading company represented by its partner ..... such determination the court is satisfied that the resistance or obstruction was occasioned without any just cause by the judgment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaldev Band and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-1983
Reported in: 1983CriLJ787
..... all or any of the following matters namely licensing controlling or in order to prevent obstruction inconvenience annoyance risk danger or damage to the residents or passengers in the vicinity prohibiting ..... which also must be noted the section reads licensing controlling or in order to prevent obstruction inconvenience annoyance risk danger or damage to the residents or passengers in the vicinity .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKush Vs. Rutledge
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-04-1983
..... construed respondent s allegations of witness intimidation see n 1 supra as containing two components obstruction of justice at the state level and interference with federal litigation the former was not ..... law it decided that the same principles applied to claims based on private conspiracies to obstruct justice in state court proceedings but the court of appeals concluded that no allegations of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrabhan Singh Vs. Shital Prasad
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-14-1983
Reported in: AIR1984MP4
..... revenue code the tahsildar sihora had directed the defendant not to obstruct the flow of water from the plaintiff s field but ..... full statutory period was established no damages resulting from the alleged obstruction to flow of water could be awarded in my opinion ..... prescriptive rights to flow water from the land of another and obstruction of which would result in certain harm or damages therefore in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTeharoonchand Vs. Surajmull Nagarmull
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-23-1983
Reported in: AIR1984Cal82,87CWN1100
..... 8 a m when he went to deliver possession he was obstructed by the judgment debtor the plaintiff filed an application under order ..... had been filed after the lapse of 30 days of the obstruction the plaintiff filed another execution case being no 6 of 1981 ..... party with reference to the report of the process server regarding the obstruction to the execution of the writ for delivery of possession should .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShakuntia and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-1983
Reported in: [1985]58CompCas677(Delhi); 1984(1)Crimes261; 25(1984)DLT33; 1984(6)DRJ92
..... that probably kerosene oil was poured into the stove and there was obstruction in the flow of kerosene oil and thereforee the pin was used ..... the funnel was used for pouring kerosene oil in the stove some obstruction or difficulty was experienced in the burning of the stove and ..... the pin was used to clear the obstruction 106 the stove was examined by an expert from the central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial