Obstructer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: obstructer Year: 1941 Page 1 of about 45 results (0.009 seconds)Surendra Kumar Basu Vs. District Board and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-01-1941
Reported in: AIR1942Cal360
..... in the processionists stopping and bewailing the death of hasan and hossain the sunnis had obstructed such a procession hence the suit the subordinate judge decreed the suit declaring the plaintiffs ..... special appeal that the plaintiffs could not maintain a civil suit in respect of such obstruction unless they could prove some damage to themselves personally in addition to the general inconvenience .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNye Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-14-1941
..... punishable because geographical nearness is not an element in making the contemptuous action an obstruction to justice these contentions assume that so near thereto can only refer to geographical ..... serious consequences to the administration of justice if courts are powerless to stop summarily obstructions like the present i think the responsibility of departing from the long accepted construction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBridges Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-1941
..... among such appropriate measures is the common law procedure of punishing certain interferences and obstructions through contempt proceedings this particular measure devolving upon the courts of california by reason ..... charles e wickliffe of kentucky acknowledged the historic power to punish interferences calculated to obstruct the exercise of the judicial function in a pending cause they did so .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRashid Allidina Vs. Jiwandas Khemji and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-03-1941
Reported in: AIR1943Cal35
..... the rights of easement of his premises and that the proposed structures would lead to obstruction annoyance or danger to health and disturbance of public tranquillity though the chairman of the ..... peace of the district the section contemplates cases ofobstruction annoyance or injury or risk of obstruction annoyance or injury to any person lawfully employed or danger to human life health or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Chicago, M. and St.P. and P. R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-31-1941
..... is not confined to the mere making or clearing of channels and removing hindrances and obstructions to their navigation but embraces the exercise of every appropriate means for the improvement of ..... true as respondents maintain that only structures in the bed of a navigable stream which obstruct or adversely affect navigation may be injured or destroyed without compensation by a federal improvement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.N. Bose Vs. Manager, Kedar Nath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-22-1941
Reported in: AIR1941Cal550
..... commissioners cause any wall to be removed or remove any other obstruction projection or encroachment from land which forms part of a ..... that we have not constructed any pucca wall encroaching and obstructing your road land of dhurrumtollah lane as wrongly mentioned in ..... had expired and apparently nothing had been done to remove the obstruction or to discuss the matter whereupon on 2nd november 1939 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPhelps Dodge Corp. Vs. Nlrb
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-28-1941
..... well as the source of its power was to eliminate the causes of certain substantial obstructions to the free flows of commerce this vital national purpose was to be accomplished by ..... to give effect to the declared public policy of the act to eliminate and prevent obstructions to interstate commerce by encouraging collective bargaining national licorice co v labor board 309 u .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. Thompson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-28-1941
..... national commerce in matters of national concern and without materially obstructing the free flow of commerce which were the principal ..... provided only that the regulation neither discriminates against nor substantially obstructs the commerce turner v maryland 107 u s 38 ..... the regulation does not in any other respect unnecessarily obstruct interstate commerce continental baking co v woodring 286 u .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhuloganatham Pillai and ors. Vs. Rajagopala Pillai and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-20-1941
Reported in: AIR1941Mad669; (1941)2MLJ105
..... a public road the respondents say that as the result of the obstruction to the road they are unable to approach their house from the ..... in procession along a public road and alleged that the defendants had obstructed them the plaintiffs did not allege any personal loss or damage caused ..... is compelled to go a longer way round by reason of an obstruction in a public street it does not follow that he has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNatabar Sasmal and ors. Vs. Krishna Chandra Bera and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-1941
Reported in: AIR1942Cal261
..... khal appears to have silted up and presumably because this caused an obstruction of the defendants drainage the defendants it is alleged wrongfully caused ..... or implied as well as by enjoyment of an adverse easement obstructing the flow of the water from the higher to the lower ..... other measures such as putting up a bund or embankment to obstruct the flow of the water from the higher level to his .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial