Skip to content


Objectionable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: objectionable Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 49 results (0.007 seconds)
Jan 14 1985 (SC)

Rasiklal Vaghajibhai Patel Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-14-1985

Reported in: AIR1985SC504; 1985(33)BLJR140; [1985(50)FLR201]; (1985)2GLR1094; (1985)ILLJ527SC; 1985(1)SCALE101; (1985)2SCC35; [1985]2SCR556; 1985(1)SLJ180(SC); 1985(17)LC508(SC)

..... in enactment such vesting does not by itself entail contravention of art 14 what is objectionable is the conferment of arbitrary and uncontrolled discretion without any guidelines for the exercise of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 1985 (HC)

Laxmidas N. Madhvani Vs. Madhvani Private Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-23-1985

Reported in: (1986)88BOMLR308

..... insisted upon the practice of relying upon unreported judgments suddenly in the court room is objectionable the practice of suddenly taking out i copy of an imported judgment without supplying its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1985 (HC)

S.L. Soni Vs. Rajasthan State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-26-1985

Reported in: 1985(1)WLN318

..... and shri m r gujar created a scene by hurling abuses and unparliamentary words and objectionable remarks and that they also made undesirable remarks about the secretary and financial adviser of ..... and shri m r gujar created a scene by hurling abuses and unparliamentary words and objectionable remarks and they also made undesirable remarks about secretary and financial adviser of the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 1985 (SC)

Balram Singh Vs. Bhikam Chand JaIn and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-04-1985

Reported in: AIR1985SC1726; 1986CriLJ19; 1985(2)Crimes731(SC); 1985(2)SCALE1387; (1985)4SCC246

..... first class sasaram 2 this necessarily implied that the contemnors would stop forthwith their objectionable activities in manufacturing and selling the patented septic tank to the prejudice of ..... the respondent rightly complains this necessarily implied that the contemnors would stop forthwith their objectionable activities of manufacturing and selling the patented septic tank to the prejudice of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 1985 (HC)

Nathu Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-23-1985

Reported in: 1985WLN(UC)125

..... of the nagpur high court held that the procedure adopted by the magistrate was highly objectionable and the confession so recorded must be rejected as not voluntary in re madagowda s ..... the instant case as discussed earlier confession ex p 13 was recorded in a highly objectionable manner it is therefore inadmissible and should not be read and acted upon against the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 1985 (HC)

Mohammad Zafar Sharief Vs. Karnataka University

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-19-1985

Reported in: ILR1987KAR1056

..... by law misbehaviour practice contrary to established rules cent dict improper or immoral conduct objectionable practice standard dist evil practice illegal or immoral conduct malpractice is mal or bad ..... by law misbehaviour practice contrary to established rules cent dict improper or immoral conduct objectionable practice standard dist evil practice illegal or immoral conduct malpractice is mal or bad .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 1985 (HC)

Sohan Singh and anr. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-25-1985

Reported in: 29(1986)DLT200

..... put in a hostel or that he goes to an unknown destiny however what is objectionable is the manner in which death is presented to the two families the entire scene .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 1985 (FN)

Maryland Vs. Macon

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-1985

..... power of search and seizure as an adjunct to a system for the suppression of objectionable publications is not new marcus v search warrant 367 u s 717 367 u s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 1985 (HC)

Jamil Shaheen and anr. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Jun-19-1985

Reported in: 1985CriLJ1682

..... with intent to create scare in the minds of the members of minority community highly objectionable slogans like pakistan zindabad we want pakistan indian dogs go back etc were raised in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1985 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Smt. Sheelan Devi

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: May-24-1985

Reported in: 1986CriLJ245

..... law and this act on the part of pardhan munshi ram was highly improper and objectionable and the accused had rightly accused him of trespassing into her house if she really .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //