Nurses And Midwives Act 1953 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: nurses and midwives act 1953 Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.169 seconds)M. Bhuvaneswari Vs. the Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council and ors ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-27-2006
Reported in : (2006)2MLJ787
..... 37 of the rules made under sub section 2 of section 11 of the madras nurses and midwives act 1926 is a must for selection from a reading of the above prospectus and ..... that the woman candidate who had been admitted to the above training before 30th september 1953 shall be eligible for appointment if she has not completed the age of 37 years .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVinayaka Mission's College of Nursing and Para-Medical Sciences, Spons ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : May-23-2006
Reported in : 2006(4)CTC162; (2006)4MLJ753
the appellant submitted a representation to the registrar tamil nadu nurses and midwives council seeking its recognition for b sc nursing submitted a representation to the registrar tamil nadu nurses and midwives council seeking its recognition for b sc nursing degree course with the provisions of the relevant regulations statutes and the act without raising an objection that the application has been filed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNageshwar Basantram Dubey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-22-2006
Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR612; 2007(3)MhLj275
midwife or health visitor registered or enlisted under the bombay nurses midwifes and health visitors act 1954 or any other corresponding stated that section 2 sub section 2 of the maharashtra act reads as follows 2 for the purpose of chapter vi
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGladhurst Coop. Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Dr. (Mrs) V.B. Shah and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : May-05-2006
Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR426; 2006(4)BomCR97
the b m c that the term clinic would include nursing home 30 defendant no 2 then invited my attention to to point out that section 4 of the ownership flats act does not apply section 4 applies when construction is in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Airlines Ltd. Vs. Prabha D. Kanan
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-10-2006
Reported in : AIR2007SC548; JT2006(10)SC334; (2007)IILLJ113SC; 2006(12)SCALE58; (2006)11SCC67; 2007AIRSCW103; 2007(2)AIRKarR56(SC)
proceeds to record its finding section 22 a of the act entitles a member to prefer an appeal to the high b sinha dalveer bhandari jj air corporations act 27 of 1953 section 45 indian airlines flying crew service regulations regulation 13
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Government of Maharashtra and ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-19-2006
Reported in : [2007(113)FLR476]
production activities as the activities of mining is a principal activity and the other activities are ancillary or subsidiary to the demand under provisions of the bombay labour welfare funds act 1953 hereinafter referred to as the labour welfare act can only
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCeo Vs. Md Ajeet Singh and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : May-16-2006
Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj917
believe as contemplated under section 59 of the estate duty act and can initiate proceedings of estate duty 2 b whether assessee under section 64 1 of the estate duty act 1953 since replealed 2 a whether where no time limit has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of H.P. Vs. Smt. Urmila Devi
Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-03-2006
Reported in : 2007(1)ShimLC129
bar created under section 171 2 xxv of the revenue act 5 a combined reading of sub sections 3 and 4 authorities prescribed and contemplated under the appellate authorities under the 1953 act would take the same view as the learned district
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Lilachand Navalmal Shah, Proprietor of Shiva Parvati Chitra Mandi ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-15-2006
Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR585; 2007(2)BomCR172
would be assessed for entertainment duty however as the amending act 1998 came into force from 1st may 1998 naturally the required under the provisions of the bombay cinemas regulation act 1953 bom xi of 1953 and the maharashtra cinemas regulation rules
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFaujdar Son of Nagar Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-06-2006
Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2243
of the director of consolidation under section 48 of the act is apparently very wide and it can be invoked without to the proceedings under u p consolidation of holdings act 1953 hereinafter referred to as the act directly invoke revisional jurisdiction
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT