Skip to content


Nullify - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: nullify Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 332 results (0.007 seconds)
Mar 17 2004 (HC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Nilappa Shankarappa Chakure and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-17-2004

Reported in: 2004(4)MhLj139

p s brahme j 1 heard shri s d kaldate learned a p p for the appellant and shri hanmant...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2004 (HC)

Nirmalabai Jaisingh Patel Vs. Poonam Siyaram Maharaj Vyas

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-22-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)ALLMR642; 2005(2)BomCR553; 2005(2)MhLj479

dharmadhikari b p j 1 heard shri parsodkar advocate for the petitioner and shri shareef advocate for the respondent 2...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 2004 (SC)

Collector of Central Excise, Meerut Vs. Maruti Foam (P) Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-22-2004

Reported in: 2004(92)ECC498; 2004(164)ELT394(SC); (2004)6SCC722; [2006]144STC161(SC)

order1 the question involved in these appeals is whether waste parings and scrap wps arising in the course of manufacture...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 2004 (SC)

State of Kerala Vs. Alex George and anr. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-18-2004

Reported in: (2004)192CTR(SC)581; [2004]271ITR290(SC); JT2004(10)SC104; 2005(1)KLT164(SC); 2004(9)SCALE545; (2005)1SCC299

s h kapadia j 1 this batch of civil appeals by special leave against the judgment and order of the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 2004 (HC)

Shri Siddegowda Vs. Smt. Mallamma and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-20-2004

Reported in: ILR2004KAR1648; 2004(7)KarLJ14

sreedhar rao j 1 the appeal filed against the judgment and decree passed in r a no 18 85 on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 2004 (TRI)

Shri Rajeev Kwatra Vs. Shri Sunil Khanna and Chandigarh

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Nov-25-2004

Reported in: (2006)129CompCas373

1 the petitioner has filed company petition no 22 of 2004 against chandigarh club ltd chandigarh under sections 397 398...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2004 (HC)

United Riceland Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-17-2004

Reported in: [2005]140STC42(P& H)

..... the constitutionality of the arbitration orissa second amendment act 1991 which had the effect of nullifying of awards already made by the special tribunal while upholding the plea of the petitioner ..... parties by having recourse to normal judicial process the impugned 1991 amendment act seeks to nullify the awards made by the special arbitration tribunals constituted under the 1984 amendment act in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2004 (SC)

Virender Singh Hooda and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-27-2004

Reported in: AIR2005SC137; 2005(1)ESC19; JT2004(9)SC293; 2004(9)SCALE120; (2004)12SCC588; 2005(3)SLJ421(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC680

..... prospective enacted by legislature cannot be declared ultra vires on the ground that it would nullify the benefit which otherwise would have been available as a result of applicability and interpretation ..... placed by a superior court a mandamus issued can be nullified by the legislature so long as the law enacted by it does not contravene constitutional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 2004 (HC)

Shrenik Bhai Kasturbhai and ors. Vs. Ganpat Rai JaIn and ors.,

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-24-2004

Reported in: 2004(2)BLJR1611; [2004(4)JCR1(Jhr)]

..... if taken to be established may not have the effect of nullifying the very notification as observed by the trial court the property ..... farmers and the alleged executive power could not be exercised to nullify the object sought to be achieved by the bihar land reforms ..... vested in it under the bihar land reforms act in effect nullifying the provisions of the act as regards one proprietor whose estate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ramesh Chandra Khandelwal

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-17-2004

Reported in: (2005)195CTR(All)276; [2005]273ITR363(All)

..... it required to be interpreted in such a manner as not to nullify that object the tribunal relying upon a decision of the punjab and ..... it required to be interpreted in such a manner as not to nullify that object the punjab and haryana high court in the case of ..... placed on the provisions of section 80c of the act it would nullify its object the only requirement is that the investment should not exceed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //