Nulled - Judgment Search Results

Sudarshan Kumar Chadha Vs. Saroj Rani

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1983P& H59

a valid decree or is such a decree not a nullity 2 if a consent decree for restitution of conjugal rights

Shanti Lal Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1983Delhi374

itself which had its origin and being in illegalities and nullities this will be a reminder to the authorities of what

Bharat Chandra Das Vs. Prangopal Ch. Das

Court: Guwahati

legal questions namely a if the subsequent decree is a nullity the executing court is competent to go behind the decree

Bhagabat Sahu Vs. Parbati Samal and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1982Ori186; 53(1982)CLT509

bound by the decree and the decree itself became a nullity this objection of the judgment debtors has been accepted that

Municipal Council, Ajmer Vs. Narinder Singh

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1982Raj289; 1982()WLN521

285 of the act was without jurisdiction and therefore a nullity the order passed by the collector under section 285 could

N.R. Natarajan Vs. Gnanambal Ammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1982)2MLJ327

him the present compromise decree cannot he construed as a nullity and the court which passed the decree had ample jurisdiction

Smt. Manju Vs. Prem Kumar

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1982WLN47

be voidable and may be annualled by a decree of nullity on any of the following grounds namely a b c

Mohan Lal Vs. Rameshwar Dass and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1983P& H380

of the view that the appeal filed was not a nullity and the lower appellate court had the jurisdiction to bring

Narasaram Vs. Smt. Babli Bai

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1983Raj208

of possession of the premises to the landlord is a nullity and cannot be executed 3 the aforesaid principle is well

Span Industries Vs. Shridhar Ganesh Jamsandekar and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1983(1)BomCR231

sharad manohar j 1 this writ petition was assiduously and elaborately argued on behalf of the both the petitioners as...