Nothing - Judgment Search Results

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... day the prime minister made her endorsement on the file and there is absolutely nothing to show nothing even in the counter affidavit of the chief justice of india that after his ..... because the expression entire matter in detail would leave no room for doubt that nothing was withheld nothing was assumed and every aspect was gone into the chief justice of delhi high .....

City of Milwaukee Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... indicate congressional intent to preserve the federal common law remedy recognized in illinois v milwaukee nothing in 510 suggests that the states may call upon federal courts to employ federal ..... not seem relevant section 510 clearly contemplates state authority to establish more stringent pollution limitations nothing in it however suggests that this was to be done by federal court actions premised .....

Shah Babulal Khimji Vs. Jayaben D. Kania and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1786; 1981(3)SCALE1169; (1981)4SCC8; [1982]1SCR187

..... that in the absence of any specific provision to the contrary nothing in the code is intended to limit or otherwise affect any ..... and identical clauses in other high courts discloses that there is nothing to show that the letters patent ever contemplated that even after ..... of its original civil jurisdiction as it shall think fit and nothing herein contained shall affect the validity of any such rules in .....

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

..... courts that billboards are real and substantial hazards to traffic safety footnote 14 there is nothing here to suggest that these judgments are unreasonable as we said in a different context ..... stipulation of facts no 28 app 48a this sweeping conclusory and rather vague generalization does nothing to explain how other media are insufficient inappropriate or too expensive more important the stipulation .....

Ridgway Vs. Ridgway

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the duty and thus protection for the member s designated beneficiaries the legislation itself says nothing about contrary dictates of state law or state judgments the supreme judicial court of maine ..... spendthrift provisions did not bar a claim for alimony or support ibid and there is nothing that evidences an intent by congress to repudiate this distinction between commercial and family obligations .....

Howe Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for the custody care subsistence education treatment and training of persons convicted it reasoned that nothing in the language of the statute gives treatment primacy or provides a basis for ..... and adequate treatment facilities and personnel are available surely is inconsistent with the view that nothing more than adequate prison accommodations are necessary to justify the transfer of a state .....

Delta Air Lines, Inc. Vs. August

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rule would insure that token offers will not be made because nothing would be gained by them in most cases the defendant as ..... incorporate by reference the definition of costs used in title vii nothing in that case is inconsistent with my reasoning here in roadway ..... rehnquist s dissenting opinion post at 450 u s 378 379 nothing herein requires prevailing defendants to receive attorney s fees as part .....

Evans Fraser and Co. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1981)25CTR(Bom)128; [1982]137ITR493(Bom); [1982]8TAXMAN22(Bom)

..... held that the shareholders of the assessee company received nothing as also lost nothing by reason of the said sale but continued to ..... other than tangible assets which in such circumstances can be nothing else than goodwill mr joshi is therefore right when he ..... or association or body of individuals whether incorporated or not but nothing herein contained shall affect any law for the time being .....

Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC33; 1981(3)SCALE1685; (1982)1SCC39; [1982]1SCR1137; 1982(14)LC802(SC)

..... the petitioners have in substance urged three grounds 1 there was nothing to prevent the state government from making a law placing ..... the stocks lying with the traders there appears to be nothing unusual on the state government issuing such executive instructions 20 ..... by the state government by the impugned teleprinter message were nothing but regulatory measures to ensure that the excess stock of .....

V. Anjaneya Setty Vs. M.G. Brothers

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1981AP250

..... the register of firms is conclusive proof of any fact stated therein nothing extraneous to ext a 1 the extract from the register of firms ..... and not the liability in law to pay where there has been nothing more than a quantum or amount adjudicated upon and no adjudication as ..... the course of the proceedings before the arbitrators ex a 25 is nothing but an extract of the amounts due by the defendant to the .....