Notarize - Judgment Search Results

N. Lakshmi and ors. Vs. Pichaiammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1988]64CompCas414(Mad)

nataraja j 1 the interesting question raised in this revision is whether the sisters of a person who died in...

Rajni JaIn Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1994IAD(Delhi)397; 53(1994)DLT465; 1994(28)DRJ383

judl dated 30 april 1992 whereby 32advocates were appointed as notaries under the provisions of the notaries act 1952 these advocates

Om Prakash JaIn and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1994Delhi59; 1994(28)DRJ171

accordingly in view of these instructions would anybody approach a notary public for getting the attestation of the documents to be

Dayanand Swaroop Aggarwal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VIAD(Delhi)487; 109(2004)DLT350; 2003(70)DRJ607

the state government whereas the respondents 3 to 18 are notaries appointed by the central government these facts are not in

Shubhakaran Muralidharji Dhanuka Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(1)ALLMR899; 2004(2)BomCR571; 2004(1)MhLj14

respondents without protest the petitioner continued to practice as a notary and submitted a fresh application on 8 7 2002 for

Chandmal Motilal Bora, Advocate and Notary Vs. the State of Maharashtr ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(2)MhLj41

the consequences of the document which he has prepared or notarised would it be proper to permit such an advocate or

Neelakant and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2004KAR2172; 2004(1)KarLJ583

aspirants and who had applied for being appointed as a notary pursuant to notification in this regard had not fulfilled the

John D'Souza Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1988KAR1279; 1987(2)KarLJ181

of the rules without resorting to those provisions appointment of notary cannot be cancelled indirectly there cannot be indefinite postponement of

Sepulchre Brothers, Proprietors, the Belgium East India Trading and En ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1942Mad13; (1941)2MLJ481

patanjali sastri j 1 the only question argued in this civil revision petition relates to the jurisdiction of the court...

M.F.Vincent Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

..... first petitioner and petitioners no 2 to5 annexure xviii two notarized separate affidavits dated2305 2014 sworn by respondents no 17 ..... first petitioner and petitioners no 2 to5 annexure xxiii two notarized separate affidavits dated2305 2014 sworn by respondents no 22 ..... first petitioner and petitioners no 2 to5 annexure xxviii two notarized separate affidavits dated2305 2014 sworn by respondents no 27 .....