Next Below Rule - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: next below rule Page 1 of about 83 results (0.026 seconds)Fisher Vs. Rule
Court: US Supreme Court
Court Fisher v. Rule, 248 U.S. 314 (1919) Fisher v. Rule No. 78 Argued November 22, 1918 Decided January 7, 1919
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPraveen Rule Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Writ Petition No.11023/2013. 5.7.2013. Shri S. Soni, learned counsel for petitioner. Heard. On the strength of decisions in Shri Anandi...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“hence the Rule (Sic. Present) Case Is a Revolving Around the Deposi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
25.1.2012, which, in substance, is as under :- Hence, the rule (Sic. present) case is a revolving around the deposing of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParker Vs. Rule's Lessee
Court: US Supreme Court
Lessee, 13 U.S. 9 Cranch 64 64 (1815) Parker v. Rule's Lessee 13 U.S. (9 Cranch) 64 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle Vs. Snyder
Court: US Supreme Court
Supreme Ruling of Fraternal Mystic Circle v. Snyder - 227 U.S. 497 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Supreme Ruling of Fraternal...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTej Pal-decree-holder Vs. Tara Singh and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1914All467; 24Ind.Cas.93
The application purported to have been made under Order XXI, rules 100 and 101, and Section 47 of the Code of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvance Ruling P. No. 14 of 1997, in Re
Court: Delhi
Reported in: [1998]234ITR335(Delhi)
incorporated under the laws of the country outside India.29. The next argument is on the basis of the DTAA between India A large number of decisions were cited, relating to well-known rules of construction of a taxing statute. What is important to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“that a Decree for Declaration to the Effect That Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
to harass the applicants by use of force till the next date of hearing.. Thereafter, on 10.05.2013 this Court passed the Courts to examine these aspects and wherever necessary make requisite rules, regulations or practice direction so as to provide appropriate guidelines
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Decree-holder (The then Vs. Bearing No.2524/1988, Seeking
Court: Delhi
the name of decree holder in the year 1991 and next steps was merely to hand over the possession of the has now filed the present execution petition under Order XXI, Rule 11(2) read with Section 151 CPC for enforcement and execution
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhub Chand Vs. Lachman Das-decree Holder
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1930All415; 122Ind.Cas.758
the proceedings must be treated as proceedings under Order 21, Rule 97 and the order of the Munsif must be treated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>