New Delhi Municipal Council Act 1994 Section 105 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: new delhi municipal council act 1994 section 105 Court: central administrative tribunal cat principal bench new delhi Page 1 of about 212 results (1.909 seconds)Ndmc Avam Karamchari Bachao Morcha Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council, Th ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
and advisor legal ndmc is illegal and void under the new delhi municipal council act 1994 and instructions of the government c no 5244 2013 before the honble high court of delhi seeking the following reliefs a to issue a legal ndmc is illegal and void under the new delhi municipal council act 1994 and instructions of the government issued from ndmc is illegal and void under the new delhi municipal council act 1994 and instructions of the government issued from time aggrieved in terms of section 19 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 held that administrative tribunal constituted under the act illegal and void under the new delhi municipal council act 1994 and instructions of the government issued from time to time central government 3 on receipt of an application under sub section 1 the tribunal shall if satisfied after such inquiry as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGaurav Singh and Others Vs. Uoi
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
such action appears to have been taken by ccit of new delhi 19 in view of the above facts and circumstances selection commission makes the selection however the high court of delhi vide its judgment dated 25 09 1992 in wp c by citing the apex courts judgment in the case of municipal corporation of delhi vs gurnam kaur supra in which it chief commissioner of income tax gujrat and bhopal had initiated action for compliance of apex courts judgment in n r parmars
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLal Singh and Another Vs. Govt. of G.N.C.T. of Delhi, Through Its Chie ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
transport corporation a govt of india undertaking i p estate new delhi no dy cgm panda 94 170 dated 16 02 on 26 02 2002 the learned single judge of the delhi high court had dismissed all the writ petitions holding that of the government of india which was extended to the municipal employees be also extended to them and in respect of the period of his retirement he has alleged that the action of the respondents in not taking decision with regard to the respondent corporation however issued a circular dated 16 02 1994 before the 1995 take over of the new pension scheme
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Minoti Roy Scientific Officer Vs. the Chairman, Atomic Energy Com ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
oral syed rafat alam chairman we have heard mrs k iyer learned counsel for the applicant and shri h k...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.K. Nehru Vs. Chairman and Managing Director and Others
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
been reiterated by the honble delhi high court also in delhi transport corporation vs jaipal singh in its judgment in w its merits 24 in m s apparel export promotion council vs a k chopra air 1999 sc 625 the honble the case was no more he had therefore assailed the actions of the respondents and reiterated that he had prepared the in union of india and ors vs upendra singh 1994 3 scc 356 this tribunal cannot undertake the process of of 4 years and find of rs 20 000 under section 7 of prevention of corruption act 1988 and in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Police Vs. Smt. Krishna Kumari
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
court of small causes and who from the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of order of this tribunal before the honble high court of delhi in writ petition civil no 7027 2010 according to the also considered the judgment in sc and st officers welfare council v state of u p air 1997 sc 1451 in barred by limitation under section 21 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 and could not have been entertained by the learned review applicant has also relied upon the instructions contained in section 3 of the limitation act and argued that it is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSauranshu Sinha and Others Vs. Union of India, Through Its Secretary a ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
seniority quota whereas 282 40 of 706 posts of the newly created vacancies should have been added to the cldce 2003 shukantala sharma vs govt of nct through lt governor of delhi and ors 2006 1 atj 239 wherein it has been ors 1998 4 scc 447 trivedi himanshu ghanshyambhai vs ahmedabad municipal corpn and ors 2007 8 scc 644 ajij ahmed khan the dopandt was allocating 40 vacancies by way of executive action the dopandt could as well allocate the cadre restructuring vacancies eligible applied for the exam for class i post namely section officer grade of the central secretariat service as per the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLokesh Rana Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Others
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
civil no 11522 2009 before the honble high court of delhi titled nand kishore and ors v dsssb and another group 2011 in oa no 1299 2011 brij mohan verma v municipal corporation of delhi in which this tribunal has relied upon in considering his case and in not having taken any action on his request for re examination of the tampering with a reading of the plain language of the above reproduced section makes it clear that the tribunal cannot admit an application
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShakeel Ahmad Burney Vs. Union of India Rep. by Its Secretary and Othe ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
a higher category of the same service or that the new post carries higher grade in the same service or class the audit and since statutory rules cannot be overlooked the actions of the respondents were justified and it was prayed that rice research institute cuttack and anr v khetra mohan das 1994 5 slr 728 and it was held as follows the oa may be treated extraordinary for the purpose of section 20 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 and had prayed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaj (Retd.) Umesh Chandra Naik Vs. National Technical Research Organiz ...
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
february 2005 accordingly the applicant resigned from arc to join new assignment in ntro which could be approved by the arc this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 seeking for the following relief s a call awarded chief of army staffs commendation card i e in 1994 and 1999 as recognition to his sincerity and hard work with the first respondent has filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act 1985 seeking for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT