Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-06-2020
Civil Appeal No.5808 of 2017 SK. MD. Rafique vs. Managing Committee, contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA1Reportable CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5808 OF2017Sk. Md. Rafique VERSUS Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others Appellant Respondents WITH C.A. No.6098/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.670/2017 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 CONMT.PET.(C) No.669/2017 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 CONMT.PET.(C) No.828/2017 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 C.A. No.5809/2017 C.A. No.5826/2017 C.A. No.5817/2017 C.A. No.5814/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.583/2016 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 C.A. No.5829/2017 W.P.(C) No.723/2016 CONMT.PET.(C) No.846/2016 In SLP(C) No.6661/2016 Civil Appeal No.5808 of 2017 SK. MD. Rafique vs. Managing Committee, contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others 2 CONMT.PET.(C) No.1509/2017 in C.A. No.5808/2017 W.P.(C) No.629/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.1798/2017 in C.A. No.5808/2017 CONMT.PET.(C) No.937/2018 in C.A. No.5808/2017 CONMT.PET.(C)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jun-19-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.452 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO.2433/2020) S.KASI ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYNALLUR POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BHUSHAN,J.ASHOK This appeal has been filed questioning the judgment of Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dated 11.05.2020 in Crl.OP(MD) No.5296 of 2020 by which judgment the bail application of the appellant has been dismissed.2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are: - 2.1. The appellant is an accused in Crime No.495 of 2015 under Sections 457, 380, 457(2), 380(2), 411(2) and 414(2) of Indian Penal Code. The appellant was arrested on 21.02.2020 in the above case 2 and lodged in Central Prison, Trichy. The bail application of the appellant under Section 439 was rejected by the trial court on 30.04.2020. After being in judicial custody for more than 73 days, the appellant filed an application Crl.OP(MD)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-14-2020
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.6932 OF2015THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS AAM AADMI LOKMANCH & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS WITH C.A. No.5971 OF2019C.A. No.4379 OF2018C.A. No.2741 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.19018 OF2018 C.A. No.6862 OF2018C.A. No.2742 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.28178 OF2018 C.A. No.11803 OF2018C.A. No.2743 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.1706 OF2019 C.A. No.2744 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.1632 OF2019 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.JUDGMENT1 Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos. 28178/2018, 1706/2019, Diary No.19018 of 2018 and 1632 of 2019. With consent of counsel for the parties, they were tagged with the companion civil appeals and heard finally. 2 2. On 06 June, 2013, when Ms. Vishakha Wadekar, was driving her car with her young daughter, Sanskruti Wadekar she had no inkling that danger lurked round the corner of the highway; over-mining at the height of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-19-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.72407248 OF2009THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT Appellant Versus M/S. CERA BOARDS AND DOORS, KANNUR KERALA ETC. ETC. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.86158620 OF2009CIVIL APPEAL Nos.22362253 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.32273230 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.32313233 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.65646567 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL Nos.99889991 OF20112 JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian,J.Introduction 1. All the appeals on hand are by the Commissioners of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax of different Commissionerates, filed under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), questioning the correctness of the orders passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Bangalore (CESTAT) in seven different batches of cases, but arising out of similar facts and raising identical questions.2. For the purpose of convenience,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-22-2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE1CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO.4116 OF2020National Alliance for Peoples Movements & Ors. . Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. . Respondent(s) JUDGMENT1 The petitioners herein were before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay claiming to be in Public Interest (PIL CJLDVC No.44/2020) seeking that the decision of the High Powered Committee (HPC for short) dated 25.03.2020 to the extent of Clauses (iii), (iv) and (vii) of paragraph 8, decisions/minutes of HPC meeting dated 11.05.2020 excluding certain categories of offences provided in 2 paragraph 5(i) and 5(ii) for the purpose of grant of interim bail and corrigendum dated 18.05.2020 of the Minutes of the Meeting of HPC dated 11.05.2020 to the extent of clarification that the class and/or category of offences determined by the HPC for temporary release be not read as a direction made by it for mandatory release of prisoners falling in that categor...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-28-2020
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.635 OF2020(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.393 of 2020) MAHESHWAR TIGGA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant assails his conviction under sections 376, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, IPC) sentencing him to seven years, one year and one month respectively with fine and a default stipulation.3. The prosecutrix, PW9 lodged FIR No.25 of 1999 on 13.04.1999 alleging that four years ago the appellant had 1 outraged her modesty at the point of a knife. He had since been promising to marry her and on that pretext continued to establish physical relations with her as husband and wife. She had also stayed at his house for fifteen days during which also he established physical relations with her. Five days prior to the lodging of the F.I.R, the appellant had established physical relations with her on 09.04.1999. T...
Tag this Judgment!