Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-05-2020
..... khet no.6195, 6196 & 6199 but banshilal, pyarelal s/o late har lal, hitesh verma s/o sh. pyarelal, pawan verma s/o banshilal, uma verma w/o pyarelal and their nepali domestic help raju from past 6 months are not allowing the applicant to work on her fields. all the above persons used to abuse the applicant her husband and other family members and use to give death threats and use caste coloured .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Dec-22-2020
1 - - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016 C/W CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100345/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100253/2016 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100193/2018 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100128/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100276/2016: BETWEEN:1. Durgappa S/o Dooda Sunkanna Aged about 56 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari 2. Kallappa S/o Hotte Durgappa Aged about 38 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari. 2 - - 3. Chandra S/o Dodda Basappa Aged about 36 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.4. Doddabasappa S/o Gurukalingappa Aged about 53 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.5. Nandihalli Mallaiah @ Mallappa S/o Honnurappa Aged about 58 years Occ: Agriculture R/o Moka Hobali, K.K.Hal Village Tq: Dist: Ballari.6. Kadap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-14-2020
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2402 OF2019VIDYA DROLIA AND OTHERS ..... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DURGA TRADING CORPORATION ..... RESPONDENT(S) W I T H SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 5605-5606 OF2019AND SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION No.11877 OF2020JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.This judgment decides the reference to three Judges made vide order dated 28th February, 2019 in Civil Appeal No.2402 of 2019 titled Vidya Drolia and Others v. Durga Trading Corporation,1 as it doubts the legal ratio expressed in Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia2 that landlord-tenant disputes governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property 1 2019 SCC OnLine SC3582 (2017) 10 SCC7061 Act, 1882, are not arbitrable as this would be contrary to public policy.2. A deeper consideration of the order of reference reveals that the issues required to be answered relate to two aspects that are distinct and yet interconnected, namely: (i) meaning of non-arbitr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Nov-30-2020
R - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF NOVEMBER2020PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT APPEAL NO.100141/2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI CHANDRAKANT S/O. TAMMANNA MAJAGI, AGE:49. YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE AND VICE PRESIDENT OF BELAGAVI BAR ASSOCIATION, BELAGAVI, R/O. PLOT NO.1011, CTS NO.5646, SECTOR NO.VI, M.M.EXTENSION, SHRINAGAR, BELAGAVI59001. APPELLANT (BY SRI.MADANMOHAN M. KHANNUR, ADV.) AND:1. KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL, OLD ELECTION COMMISSION BUILDING, BENGALURU56001, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.2. KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL, OLD ELECTION COMMISSION BUILDING, BENGALURU56001.3. BELAGAVI BAR ASSOCIATION BELAGAVI, DISTRICT COURT COMPOUND, BELAGAVI59000, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.-. 2 - 4. DINESH M. PATIL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC. ADVOCATE AND CLAIMING PRESIDENT (APPELLANT IS DISPUTING HIM AS PRESIDENT) BELAGAVI BAR ASSOCIATION BELAGAVI, DISTRICT COURT COMPOUND, BELAGAVI59000, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY. RESPOND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-03-2020
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.1648 of 2019 Rajesh @ Sarkari & Anr. ...Appellants Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J1The appellants Rajesh alias Sarkari and Ajay Hooda have been convicted, 1 together with a co-accused for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 2 34 of the India Penal Code and have been sentenced to imprisonment for life. 3 2 On 26 December 2006, a ruqqa was received at the Police Post, PGIMS from PGIMS, Rohtak about Sandeep Hooda, son of Azad Singh Hooda, having 1 Pehlad Singh alias Harpal 2 IPC1been brought dead there. ASI, Meha Singh met Azad Singh, the complainant, at the emergency ward in PGIMS, Rohtak. Azad Singh made a statement which 4 was reduced into writing upon which a First Information Report being FIR No.5 781 was registered under Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code at Police Station Sadar, Rohtak. The complainant stated that his elder s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-02-2020
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.763-764 OF2016SHATRUGHNA BABAN MESHRAM Appellant VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. These appeals by Special Leave challenge the common judgment and order dated 12.10.2015 passed by the High Court1 in Criminal Appeal No.321 of 2015 and Criminal Confirmation Case No.1 of 2015 affirming the judgment and order dated 14.08.2015 passed by the Trial Court2 in Special Case (POCSO Act3) No.11 of 2013 and confirming the Death Sentence awarded to the Appellant on two counts i.e. under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC, for short) and under Section 376A of IPC. 1 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur. 2 The Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal 3 The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 22. The victim in the present case was a girl of two and half years of age and the First Information Report was lodged at 09.25 p.m. on 1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-29-2020
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.152 OF2013TOFAN SINGH Appellant Versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1750 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2214 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.827 OF2010CRIMINAL APPEAL No.835 OF2011CRIMINAL APPEAL No.836 OF2011CRIMINAL APPEAL No.344 OF2013CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1826 OF2013CRIMINAL APPEAL No.433 OF2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.6338 OF2015CRIMINAL APPEAL No.77 OF2015CRIMINAL APPEAL No.90 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.91 OF2017SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.1202 OF2017JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1.These Appeals and Special Leave Petitions arise by virtue of a reference order of a Division Bench of this Court reported as Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013) 16 SCC31 The facts in that 1 appeal have been set out in that judgment in some detail, and need not be repeated by us. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court recorded that the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.152 of 2013 ...
Tag this Judgment!