Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: old Year: 2008 Page 3 of about 424 results (0.005 seconds)

Majorstake Limited (Respondents) Vs. Curtis (Appellant)

Court : House of Lords

LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD My Lords, 1. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speeches of my noble and learned friends, Lord Scott of Foscote and Baroness Hale of Richmond. I am grateful to Lord Scott for setting out the facts and the procedural history and to Baroness Hale for her explanation of the wider context in which the legislation that we are concerned with needs to be viewed. For the reasons Baroness Hale gives I would allow the appeal and make the order that she proposes. 2. The question is whether the phrase “the whole or a substantial part of any premises in which the flat is contained” in section 47(2)(b)(ii) of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 enables the landlord, unconstrained by their existing state, to identify the premises by drawing his own line around the tenant’s flat in support of his counter-notice or whether it refers to the existing and objectively recognisable state of the premises. No direct assistance can...

Pilecki (Appellant) Vs. Circuit Court of Legnica, Poland (Respondents) ...

Court : House of Lords

LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL My Lords, 1. For the reasons given by my noble and learned friend Lord Hope of Craighead, with which I agree, I would dismiss this appeal. LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD My Lords, 2. In April 2007 two European arrest warrants were issued by the Circuit Court of Legnica for the extradition of the appellant to Poland. The decisions on which the warrants were based were orders by Judge Bartlomiej Treter for the appellant to be arrested for the purpose of serving custodial sentences which had been imposed on him by the District Court in Lubin after his conviction for various offences and which had become final. The validity of each warrant falls to be determined under Part 1 of the Extradition Act 2003. This is the measure by which the United Kingdom has transposed into national law the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/548/JHA; OJ 2002 L 190, p1). Poland was designated as a ca...

In Re Maye (Ap) (Appellant) (Northern Ireland)

Court : House of Lords

LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL My Lords, 1. I have had the benefit of reading in draft the opinion of my noble and learned friend Lord Scott of Foscote. I am in full agreement with his reasoning and his conclusions and therefore, like him, I would dismiss the appeal. LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE My Lords, 2. This is an appeal from the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland. The Statement of Facts and Issues, agreed and signed by counsel for both parties, identifies two issues of construction of the Proceeds of Crime (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 (“the 1996 Order”) for your Lordships to decide. One of these your Lordships must decide; the other, in my opinion, does not arise on the facts of this case. It is convenient, therefore, before describing the issues, to outline the relevant facts. The facts 3. At arraignments on 8 January 2002 and 15 January 2002 the appellant, Mr Maye, pleaded guilty to various counts of obtaining property by deception. Sentencing was adjourned in order, inter ali...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kwh Pipes (India) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)(128)ECC199

1. The factory of the respondents herein who are engaged in the manufacture of HDPE pipes and fittings falling under Chapter 39 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, was visited by preventive officers of central excise on 8.9.1998 and on verification of the stock of finished goods, shortage of stock compared to the balance recorded in the RG1 register was detected. The finished goods, i.e. HDPE pipes of various qualities involving duty of Rs. 3,75,791/-, were found short. The assessee paid central excise duty on such shortage. Further scrutiny of records revealed that the assessees cleared their goods, viz. HDPE pipes sprinkle irrigation, to various depots all over India, from where they finally sold to customers/dealers. Price declaration of the finished goods was filed by the assessees and it was noticed that the assessees had charged a higher price for sprinkler coupler than declared in annexure-II. It was also found that they were charging their customer fo...

Paramjit Singh Sadana Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by the Secretary (Legisla ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD(Cri)712; 2008(3)ALT74; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)339; 2008CriLJ3432; 2008(2)KLT941

..... /o. late jasbeen singh sadana has submitted a representation stating that her husband sardar jasbeen singh sadana was brutally murdered by his brother pramjit singh sadana (a1) along with his nepali servants a2 to a5 on the intervening night of 27/28.04.2006 at her residence. she also stated that the entire case depends on circumstantial evidence and the police ..... complainant alleged that her husband sri jasbir singh was murdered on the intervening night of 27/28.04.2006, and she suspected her servants namely a2 to a5, who are nepalies, to be the culprits. during the course of investigation, she gave a statement that she suspected that the brother of the deceased (petitioner in w.p. no. 21851 of 2007 .....

Sanjay Singh @ Mithlesh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Patna

..... officials. after observing paraphernalia search of the bag was made and it was found that it was carrying photo frame of goddess durga, on removing the photo 11 pockets of nepali charas measuring 5 kjg. was found there. initially the accused denied his knowledge about the article which was seized but later on confessed. the prosecution report dated 26.6.1992 .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Kitbokson War and ors.

Court : Guwahati

H. Baruah, J.1. Heard Mr. V. K. Jindal, learned Counsel for and on behalf of the appellant, M/s. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and also heard Mr. H. Mongkhlaw, learned Counsel for and on behalf of the respondent.2. The appellant, M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. by presenting this instant appeal has challenged the legality and correctness of the judgment and order dated 28-5-2007 passed in MAC Case No. 13/2007 by the learned Member, MACT, Shillong.3. An accident took place at Ryngdang-briew under Umiam Police Station, Ri-Bhoi District on Guwahati Shillong Road of 24-12-2004 at 7-45 p.m. and in the said accident a Maruti Car being registration No. ML 05C-5768 belonging to respondent No. 1 herein got damaged on being hit by a Truck bearing registration No. TR IC-1592 belonging to respondent No. 2 herein. The owner, respondent No. 1 as claimant filed an application under Section 166 of the MV Act, 1988 seeking compensation for the damage caused to his vehicle from the insurer of the Tr...

Rajeev Goswami Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... in section 160(1) of the regulations and such persons are the cultivators belonging to plains tribals, hills tribes, tea garden tribals, santhals, scheduled castes, nepali cultivator - graziers. that being the position, the action of the authorities by keeping in mind the constitutional scheme, the necessary provisions having made for adequate ..... sub-section (l) of the said section of the regulation.cultivators pertaining to the following classes, namely plains tribals, hill tribes, tea garden tribals, santhals, nepali cultivator - graziers and scheduled caste.sd/- s.j. duncan,secy to the govt. of assam, finance& revenue department.14. after issuance of the aforesaid notification ..... and occupation of other classes of persons as enumerated in the notification dated 5.12.1947, namely plains tribals, hill tribes, tea garden tribals, santhals and nepali cultivator - graziers. in view of the aforesaid facts situation, the submissions made by mr. deka has no legs to stand. consequently, i have no .....

Sri Kenchegowda Vs. K.B. Krishnappa and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR3453; 2009(4)KarLJ613; 2008(4)KCCR2536

N. Kumar, J.1. This is the plaintiffs second appeal against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court which has dismissed the suit for partition after setting aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court which had decreed the suit.2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit.3. The plaintiff is the son of the first defendant Boregowda through his fourth wife Chikkathayama. Second defendant Krishnappa is the son of Boregowda through his second wife Smt. Jayamma. Basamma, Sakkamma and Boramma, defendants 3 to 5 are the daughters of Boregowda through his third wife Devamma.4. The case of the plaintiff is he and defendants constitute a Hindu Undivided Family. All the suit schedule properties are joint family properties. First defendant is the Kartha of the joint family. Plaintiff is in joint possession of the suit schedule properties as Co-larcener along with the defendants. As it is not possible for him to conti...

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Unger Booke David

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)116TTJ(Delhi)513

1. This appeal by the Revenue for asst. yr. 2001-02 arises out of order of CIT(A)-XXX, New Delhi.2. The only issue for consideration relates to treating the period of 41 days spent by the assessee in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and U.K. were for performance of duties outside India. The effective grounds of appeal are reproduced as under: (1) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) is not justified in holding that a period of 41 days spent by the assessee in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and U.K. (2) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred in holding that as per contract the visits to Sri Lanka and Pakistan were on account of work done in those countries where as per record, the assessee had completely failed to submit copies of such contract/ appointment letter before the AO. (3) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, learned CIT(A) has erred in holding the separate tax treatment should be given to on periods and off periods sala...