Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.6994 of 2003 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 18.07.2014 District Bar Association, Panchkula ..Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present: Mr.Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.H.S.Lalli, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana Mr.D.V.Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3/HUDA .SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral).The writ petition has been filed by the District Bar Association, Panchkula, which is an association of lawyeRs.through its elected representatives in pursuance to a resolution duly passed. A challenge is laid to the notification dated 12.1.1999 amending the Haryana Urban Development (Disposal of Land and Buildings) Regulations, 1978 (hereinafter to be referred to as the said Regulations.).In terms of the Regulations originally framed, the undisput...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-25-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-4405 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-4405 of 2014 Date of Decision: 25.07.2014 Satinder Singh Sandhu ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:-Mr.Subash Chand, Advocate for Mr.Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.D.S.Virk, A.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Petitioner-Satinder Singh Sandhu has approached this Court by way of filing the present petition for quashing of FIR No.262 dated 11.11.2010 registered under Sections 406, 498-A and 506 IPC at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana City along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner and respondent No.2 are husband and wife and had solemnized their marriage on 13.07.2008. Thereafter, their marriage was not smooth and relations between them became strained. N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-25-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-8757 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-8757 of 2014 Date of Decision: 25.07.2014 Gulshan Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr.Viney Saini, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Pradeep Virk, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr.Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. PetitioneRs.namely Gulshan Kumar, Kundal Lal, Tarun Kumar and Tamanna are accused in case FIR No.64 dated 14.02.2011 registered under Sections 498-A/506/323 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station Ambala City. Petitioner no.1 is husband, petitioner No.2 is father-in-law, petitioner No.3 is brother-in-law (jeth) and petitioner No.4 is sister-in-law (jethani) of the complainant-respondent No.2. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 25.11.2000. However, out of the said wedlock, two childr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2717 of 2014 Date of Decision : 4.8.2014 Ambika and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER ...Present: Mr.Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab....MAHESH GROVER.J.The petitioneRs.grievance is that they were appointed as ETT Teachers in the Zila Parishad and are now absorbed in the Education Department even though a grievance has been made that a pick and choose policy has been followed but the issue of seniority has been raised. The petitioners were appointed in the district cadre which prohibited a transfer outside the district except in the case of matrimony necessitating facilitation of getting the married couple posted at one station. In this regard an option was to be exercised by the affected employee and in terms of Annexure P-5, the relevant part of which is extracted herebelow, the seniority was to be p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-05-2014
CP No.129 of2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CP No.129 of2014(O&M) Date of Decision : 05.08.2014 ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited ....Non Petitioner/Transferor Company with ELDECO Infrastructure and Properties Limited .....Petitioner/Transferee Company CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present : Mr.Mukesh Sukhija and Mr.Yash Pal Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner Company MAHESH GROVER, J. This is a petition under Section 391 (1) read with Section 100- 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 in connection with the proposed Scheme of Arrangement for reduction of capital of ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited and Amalgamation of ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited ( Tranferor Company) with ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES Limited (Transferee Company).A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement has been appended alongwith the petition at Anneuxre P-1. The Transferee Company is a public limited Company having its registered office in Faridabad and is thus having the competence to invoke...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-06-2014
CRA-S-1196-SB-2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-1196-SB-2003 Date of Decision:06. 08.2014 Harbhajan Singh ......Appellant Vs. State of Punjab .........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN Present: Mr. H.R. Nohria, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Shivali, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. ***** MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN, J.(ORAL) Bhag Singh, along with his father, Mohinder Singh and two sons Harbhajan Singh and Avtar Singh, was tried for the offence punishable under Sections 307/326/324/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-Fast Track Court, Ferozepur (for short 'the trial Court') Bhag Singh died during the pendency of trial. Vide judgment/order dated 21.04.2003, learned trial Court acquitted Avtar Singh as prosecution could not fix his guilt beyond reasonable doubt but Mohinder Singh was convicted under Section 323, IPC, and was released on p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-08-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-35991 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-35991 of 2013 Date of Decision:08. 08.2014 Amritpal Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. B.S. Dandiwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Parupkar Singh Ghuman, Addl. A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.Petitioners-Amritpal Singh, Iqbal Singh, Ujagar Singh, Basant Kaur and Avtar Singh have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition for quashing of FIR No.42 dated 28.05.2013 registered under Sections 498-A, 323, 148, 120-B IPC read with Section 149, IPC, at Police Station Sadar Budlada, District Mansa along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled by wa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-08-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-27584 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-27584 of 2013 Date of Decision:08. 08.2014 Parminderjit Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Ish Puneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Virk, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.Petitioners-Parminderjit Singh, Gurjit Singh and Ranjit Kaur have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition for quashing of FIR No.143 dated 10.05.2011 registered under Sections 498- A, 323, 406 and 506 IPC at Police Station Baldev Nagar, Ambala City, District Ambala along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner No.1 got married to complainant/respondent No.4 on 03.12.2009 and thereafter,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.7380 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:08.08.2014 Raj Kumari wife of Shri Om Parkash, House No.387, Sector 14, Sonepat (Haryana). ... Petitioner versus Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Panipat Divisional Office, Panipat Marketing Complex, Village Baholi, Post Office Panipat Refinery, District Panipat, through its Managing Director, and others. .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Arun Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. Yes.2. To be referred to the reporters or not ?. Yes.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. Yes. ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner seeks for quashing of letter of intent and allotment of retail outlet dealership for the location at Village Karhans, District...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-14-2014
CWP No.8980 of 2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.8980 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision : 14.08.2014 Harjinder Singh and others ......Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present:- Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioners Ms.Monica Chibber Sharma, DAG, Punjab MAHESH GROVER, J The petitioners impugn public notice (Annexure P-15).Similar notice was challenged before this Court in CWP No.1572 of 2013 where similarly situated persons as the petitioners who were selected pursuant to selection process in the year 2008 put it to question. The said writ petition was disposed of with the following directions:- Directions are issued to the respondents to issue a public notice calling for applications from interested candidates possessing higher qualifications of B.P.E/ B.P.Ed/ D.P.Ed/ M.P.Ed prior to 29.04.2008 within a period of 30 days from the date of such publication of the not...
Tag this Judgment!