Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-02-2019
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.66 OF2018IN TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1399 OF2018DHARANI SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.339 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.802 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1086 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1110 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1124 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1142 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1138 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1156 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1153 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1166 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1206 OF20181 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1212 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1236 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1296 OF2018SLP(C) No.31421 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1316 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1308 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1359 OF2018TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.65 OF2018IN TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No.1404 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1363 OF20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-10-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3934 OF2017RAM PARSHOTAM MITTAL & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3935 OF2017JUDGMENT ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The appeal arises out of the judgment dated 31.5.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi, setting aside an order dated 31.1.2006 passed by the Company Law Board in Company Petition No.64/2005.2. The backdrop facts indicate that the Government of India took a policy decision on 5.7.2002 to disinvest its shares in the Indian Tourism Development Corporation (in short, the ITDC) which owns various hotel properties; one of them being Indraprastha Hotel, formerly known as Hotel Ashok Yatri Niwas, (hereinafter referred to as the hotel).3. In terms of an approved scheme of Arrangement of Demerger the hotel was transferred to the Respondent No.1 Hotel Queen Road Pvt. 2 Ltd. (in short, HQRL) which was created as a Special Purpose Vehicle to enable ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-14-2019
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Review Petition (Crl.) No.46 of 2019 IN Writ Petition (Crl.) No.298 of 2018 YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. .Petitioners Versus .Respondents INTERVENTION APPLICATION, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through its DIRECTOR & ANR. (I.A. No.69008/2019 CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION, I.A. No.69006/2019 I.A. No.71047/2019 PRODUCTION OF RECORDS and I.A. No.69009/2019 STAY APPLICATION) WITH MA582019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.225/2018 (PIL-W) (I.A. No.182576/2018 CORRECTION OF MISTAKES IN THE JUDGMENT) R.P.(Crl.) No.122/2019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.297/2018 (PIL-W) 1 No.29248/2019 CRIMINAL INITIATING MA4032019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.298/2018 (PIL-W) (I.A. PROCEEDINGS U/S340OF CRPC) R.P.(C) No.719/2019 in W.P.(C) No.1205/2018 (PIL-W) CONMT.PET.(Crl.) No.3/2019 in R.P.(Crl.) No.46/2019 in W.P.(Crl.) No.298/2018 (PIL-W) (I.A. No.63168/2019 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., I.A. No.71678/2019 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and I.A. No.66253/2019 EXEMPTION FROM F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-12-2019
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 1890 OF2011PRATAP SINGH @ PIKKI ..Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. The appellant(accused No.1) along with three others tried for an offence under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 and 323/149 of the Indian Penal Code(hereinafter being referred to as IPC). The appellant and one Vikas Kirola were convicted under Section 304 Part II/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and other two persons Manoj Singh Rautela and 1 Deepak Pathak were acquitted vide judgment dated 12th January, 1998.2. Both the unsuccessful convicted persons preferred criminal appeal against the judgment dated 12th January, 1998 before the High Court of Uttarakhand. In the case of appellant, the High Court observed that according to his marksheet of Secondary School Certificate Examination 1993, his date of birth is 13th June, 1977 while the incident was o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-30-2019
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE Civil Appeal No(s). 5943-5945 of 2019 (@SLP(C) Nos. 28719-28721 of 2015) Indsil Hydro Power & Manganese Ltd Appellant(s) Versus State of Kerala & Ors Etc Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J12 Leave granted. These appeals arise from the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala dated 21 August 2015. The High Court has dismissed the writ proceedings instituted by the appellant under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3 On 7 December 1990, the State of Kerala issued G.O (Ms) No.23/90/PD by which private entities were permitted to construct and operate Hydel Power Projects for the generation of power, subject to certain conditions. These conditions, broadly speaking were: The Private Agencies would be allowed to set up sanctioned hydel schemes at their own cost. Where the power scheme is located in an area owned by the 2 Respondents, the land would be leased for a period of 30...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-02-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11133 OF2011M/S ADANI POWER (MUNDRA) LTD. .... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appellant has approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (the Appellate Tribunal for short) in Appeal No.184 of 2010 dated 07.09.2011 thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present appellant and confirming the judgment and order passed by the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (the Commission for short) dated 31.08.2010.2. The facts in brief giving rise to the present appeal are as under. 2 Respondent No.2, namely, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the procurer) is a holding company engaged in the business of bulk purchases from the power generators and supply to the distribution companies in the State of Gujarat. On 01.02.2006, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-23-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).6295 OF2015The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank ..Appellant(s) D. Visalakshi and Anr. Versus With .Respondent(s) Civil Appeal No(s) 75547555 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) No(s).1243012431 of 2015) Criminal Appeal No(s) 14631464 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s).393394 of 2019) Civil Appeal No(s) 7557 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) No(s) 23193 of 2019) (Arising out of Diary No(s).47134 of 2018 Civil Appeal No(s) 7558 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) No(s).7121 of 2019) Criminal Appeal No(s) 1465 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s).3507 of 2019) Criminal Appeal No(s) 1478 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s).3689 of 2019) Criminal Appeal No(s) 1466 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s).4351 of 2019) Criminal Appeal No(s) 1467 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s).4293 of 2019) 2 Criminal Appeal No(s) 1468 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s).4387 of 2019) Criminal Appeal ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-05-2019
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE/ ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.140151 OF2012CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS MOHD. PARVEZ ABDUL KAYUUM ETC. RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 981982 OF2019(Arising out of Special Leave Petition Nos.90289029 of 2016) CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.8394 OF2012CRIMINAL APPEAL No.983 OF2019(Arising out of Special Leave Petition No.5530 of 2017) AND WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.26 OF2019JUDGMENT ARUN MISHRA, J.1. The facts, in short, envisage that initially two separate cases were registered by local Police relating to the murder of Mr. Haren Pandya, exHome Minister for the State of Gujarat on 26.3.2003 and an attempt on the life of Mr. Jagdish Tiwari, a Viswa Hindu Parishad (VHP) leader of Ahmedabad on 11.3.2003. The case of murder was 2 initially registered on the basis of a complaint brought by Mr. Janak Singh Parmar, vide FIR bearing IC.R. No.272/2003 at Ellisbridge Police Station, Ahmedabad, on ...
Tag this Judgment!