Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-27-2014
Crl. Appeal No.D-202-DB of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Appeal No.D-202-DB of 2009 Date of decision: 27.1.2014 Kala and another .....Appellants Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent AND Crl. Appeal No.D-252-DB of 2009 Date of decision: 27.1.2014 Jeet Ram alias Jeeta .....Appellant Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH Present: Mr.Vinod Ghai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Simrandeep Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Mr.Manuj Nagrath, Addl.AG Haryana. Kuldip Singh, J. By this judgment, we will dispose of two Criminal Appeals Kumari Meenu 2014.02.11 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh Crl. Appeal No.D-202-DB of 2009 -2- No.D-202-DB of 2009 titled as Kala and another versus State of Haryana and No.D-252-DB of 2009 titled as Jeet Ram alias Jeeta versus State of Haryana. The brief facts of the prosecution are that on 29.8.2005, Ashok ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-17-2014
CRM-M-4266 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-M-4266 of 2014 Date of Decision: 17.02.2014 Amit ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Nipun Vashist, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajat Mor, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondent-State. MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN, J. (ORAL) By way of this petition, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, petitioner seeks release on bail pending trial in FIR No.272 dated 20.07.2013 recorded at Police Station Badshahpur, District Gurgaon, under Sections 392, 34 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Notice of motion. On the asking of this Court, Mr.Rajat Mor, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. As agreed by both the learned counsel, the petition is taken on board for final disposal. Heard. As per case of the prosecution, the present petitioner, along with his co-accused Naval and Dushy...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-18-2014
Criminal Misc.No.M-44299 of 2013 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-44299 of 2013 Date of Decision: 18th February, 2014 Pawender Partap Singh & Anr.Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.H.N.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Nitin Kaushal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Nipun Vashist, Advocate, for the complainant. *** Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioneRs.Pawender Partap Singh and Kesar Singh who have been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 365, IPC, in a case arising out of FIR No.446, dated 09.11.2013, registered at Police Station, Dharuhera, District Rewari. Learned counsel contends that the petitioners were not named in the FIR and the aggrieved person, namely, Nepal Singh had stated to the police at Kotputli that he was not kidnapped by any body and was proceedings towards Kotputli on his own...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-26-2014
Crl. Appeal No.1624-SB of 2003 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Appeal No.1624-SB of 2003 Date of Decision: March 26, 2014 Shambhu Kumar and others ---Appellants versus State of Haryana ---Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Rekha Mittal Present: Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Anupam Sharma, AAG, Haryana for respondent-State. *** 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. *** REKHA MITTAL, J. The present appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.8.2003 and 1.9.3003, respectively., whereby the appellants namely Shambhu Kumar and Rambhu, sons of Naresh Mangal and Sangeeta wife of Anirudh Mishra have been convicted and sentenced for commission of offence punishable under Sections 307, 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short Saini Paramjit Kaur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Kang Gursharan Singh 2014.04.04 12:27 Civil Writ Petition No.21175 of 2013 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : APRIL02 2014 PREETI ......PETITIONER VERSUS THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI PRESENT: Sarvshri Vivek Malik and Saran Suri, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Manav Bajaj, Advocate, for Mr.Sumeet Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Respondent No.4 ex-parte vide order dated 14.01.2014. Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6..SANJAY KISHAN KAUL KAUL,, CJ. (Oral) The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Hafed')/respondent No.1 invited tenders on 23.7.2012 for construction of a godown of the capacity of 45,000 Metric Ton in Round V under Private Ent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-07-2014
vinod kumar 2014.05.20 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Rs.No.84 of 2011 (O&M) [1].CR No.1758 of 2011 (O&M) ***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Rs.No.84 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:07.05.2014 Ram Sarup and others ...Appellants Versus Mahavir and another ...Respondents (2) CR No.1758 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:07.05.2014 Nepal Singh and others ...Appellants Versus Mahavir and another ...Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain Present: Mr.Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for the appellants. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. This order shall dispose of Rs.No.84 of 2011 and Civil Revision No.1758 of 2011 being inter-connected. However, the facts are being extracted from Rs.No.84 of 2011. The plaintiffs-appellants filed the suit for declaration that they are absolute owners in possession of the land falling in KhaSr.No.30, Khatauni No.35, Rect. No.12, Killa No.12/1(2-6).12/2(5-7).total measuring 7 kanals 13 marlas, s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
CWP No.5414 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.5414 of 2013(O&M) Date of decision:15.7.2014 Gajraj Singh .Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present: Mr.R.S.Sihota, Senior Advocate with Mr.B.R.Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Karminder Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. **** HEMANT GUPTA, J.(Oral) The challenge in the present writ petition is to an order passed by Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Regional Bench at Chandimandir (for short the Tribunal) on 09.05.2011 whereby a Civil Suit filed by the petitioner before the Civil Judge (Junior Division).Rewari, transferred to the Tribunal, was dismissed. The petitioner served in Indian Navy from 21.07.1959 to 12.07.1971 and was placed in Indian Navy Fleet Reserve w.e.f.17.09.1970 for a period of 10 yeaRs.The eligibility to earn pension in terms of Regulation 78 of Navy (Pension) Regulations,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-20-2014
ARCHANA ARORA CWP No.15488 of 2014 1 2014.08.22 15:32 I am the author of this document IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.15488 of 2014 Date of decision: August 20, 2014 State of Haryana through Collector Bhiwani and another ....... Petitioners Versus Bhagwani and another ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Himanshu Raj , AAG.,Haryana for the petitioners. **** K. Kannan, J (oral).1. The challenge in the writ petition is by the State to an award passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat directing the State to honour its commitment under Rajiv Gandhi Parivar Bima Yojna scheme of providing for `1 lac as the insured amount to the family of the deceased who was in a lower income bracket. The policy itself was a measure of public welfare scheme floated by the State to help the family of a deceased citizen from distress and deprivation due to sudden death.2. When the claim was by the widow on a plea that her husband had died in a motor accide...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-13-2014
CWP No.4751 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.4751 of 2014 Date of decision:13. 03.2014 M/s Auto Dynamic Corporation Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others ..Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Mr.Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.1. Challenge in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing Show Cause Notice dated 10.3.2014, Annexure P.1 whereby respondent No.2 has called upon the petitioner to show cause to respondent No.3 as to why period of six months prescribed under section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short, the Act.) be not further extended for six months.2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the petition may be noticed. The petitioner is engaged in the business of trading of imported automobile parts. It was directly importing automobile parts and selli...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-05-2014
CP No.129 of2014(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CP No.129 of2014(O&M) Date of Decision : 05.08.2014 ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited ....Non Petitioner/Transferor Company with ELDECO Infrastructure and Properties Limited .....Petitioner/Transferee Company CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER Present : Mr.Mukesh Sukhija and Mr.Yash Pal Gupta, Advocates for the petitioner Company MAHESH GROVER, J. This is a petition under Section 391 (1) read with Section 100- 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 in connection with the proposed Scheme of Arrangement for reduction of capital of ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited and Amalgamation of ELDECO MIDC SEZ Limited ( Tranferor Company) with ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES Limited (Transferee Company).A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement has been appended alongwith the petition at Anneuxre P-1. The Transferee Company is a public limited Company having its registered office in Faridabad and is thus having the competence to invoke...
Tag this Judgment!