Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jun-10-2008
Reported in : [2008(3)JCR400(Jhr)]
D.K. Sinha, J.1. The petitioner has preferred Criminal Revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act against the order impugned dated 7.2.2005 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court. Dhanbad in M.P. Case No. 96 of 2004 whereby the learned Principal Judge while allowing the petition filed on behalf of the O.P. No 2 in a proceeding under Section 125, CrPC enhanced the amount of maintenance suo motu without consent of the petitioner and beyond the scope of relief as sought for.2. Short fact of the case was that the O.P. No. 2 Achho Devi admitted to be the wife of the petitioner initiated a proceeding under Section 125, CrPC demanding monthly maintenance to the tune of Rs. 1000/- from the petitioner. Though it was admitted by the petitioner husband in respect of a criminal case in which both the parties entered into compromise in Criminal Appeal No. 88 of 1994 with certain terms and conditions laid down in the compromise petition and the same was disposed of by the 1st Addition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Dec-01-2008
Reported in : [2009(1)JCR363(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 19.9.2006 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, in O.A. No. 34/2006 whereby the tribunal remitted back the matter to the appellate authority for reconsideration.2. The petitioner Kendriya Vidyalya Santaghan is a registered Society fully financed by the Government of India to meet the educational needs of the children of transferable Central Government employees including defence personnel and to run the school. One of such school is running at Chakradharpur. On 1.2.2003 one complaint was made by Sri Rajesh Sarangi, local guardian of Kumari Varsha Tripathi, a student of class VIII in the said school at Chakradharpur, to the Principal about the misbehaviour with his ward by the respondent Muni Lal Prasad and demanded action against him. In the complaint i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Feb-27-2008
Reported in : [2008(2)JCR23(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The petitioner had moved this Court earlier in WPC No. 224/2004 making a grievance that he being the lowest bidder was issue work order for supplying two lifts of OTIS make by the Director, State Institute of Rural Development but subsequently by letter dated 29.12.2006, the Deputy Director of the said Institute cancelled the work order without any notice or opportunity to explain the allegations made against the petitioner and. therefore, it was against the principle of natural justice.3. The said writ petition was allowed by order dated 26.2.2007 only on the ground that the work order was cancelled in violation of principle of natural justice and it was observed that if the respondents intend to proceed against the petitioner they may do so in accordance with the procedure established by law after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.4. Thereafter, it appears that a notice was issued to the petitioner by the responden...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Oct-20-2008
Reported in : 2009CriLJ2288; [2008(4)JCR597(Jhr)]
1. By Court The present appeal has been filed by the sole appellant Shiv Shankar Sah against the judgment dated 01/09/1990 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Dumka, in Sessions Case No. 173/1988, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC for committing the murder of Renu Devi and thereby, sentenced him to undergo R.I. for life. The three other accused namely, Madan Lal Sah, Bina Devi and Bhuli Devi, who were tried together with the present appellant, however, have been acquitted from the charges under Section 302/34 IPC by the trial court.2. One Narayn Kumar Mukherjee (PW-3), who is a Pujari of a 'Yaga Shala', situated in Basukinath gave a Fardbeyan to O/C Jarmundi police station on 05/09/1986 stating therein that his 'Yaga Shala', where he used to reside, was situated just opposite to the house of Balgovind Sah, the father of the appellant and he was closely acquainted with all the family members of the sai...
Tag this Judgment!