Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1962 of 2013 Nepali Ganjhu @ Nepali Singh @ Nepali Ji @ Gorai Ganjhu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.2, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B)(a), 27, 35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3, 4 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, in connection with Manatu P.S. Case No. 77 of 2005 corresponding to G.R. No. 1956 of 2005, S.T. No. 389 of 2011. Though the petitioner is named in the FIR on the basis of statement made by the apprehended co-accused, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that some of the co-accused persons, who faced trial, have been acqu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6756 of 2011 Nepali Ganjhu @ Gorai Ganjhu Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: ..... . PetitionerOpposite PartyHONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. Surendra Prasad Sinha :A. P.P.For the Petitioner For the State 02/10.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. forthe Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 364, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of C.L.A. Act, in connection with S. T. Case No. 46 of 2010 arising out of Patan P.S. Case No. 179 of 2004, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1518 of 2004. The case relates to abduction and murder of one Pankaj Kumar. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and, accordingly, has prayed for bail. From the impugned order, it appears that only material against this petitioner is that the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.7766 o1. Amit Dey @ Nepali Dey @ Amit Kumar Dey 2. Bikram Dey @ Bikram Kumar Dey ...............Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.Indrajit Sinha For the State : A.P.P 2.11.9.13. I.A.No.6976 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioners are accused in Gomia P.S. case no.58 of 2013 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 333, 353, 323,307 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that it is the case of the prosecution that members of the mob to which these two petitioners were also the party attacked police personnel whereby four police personnel sustained injury but those injuries are simple in nature except one injury. Considering all these aspects of the matter, other persons, who were members of the mob have been admitted to bail by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 Death Reference No.3 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Death Reference No.3 of 2013 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No.708 of 2013 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No.775 of 2013 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No.931 of 2013 With Cr. Appeal (DB) No.966 of 2013 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 12 th July 2013 and Order of sentence dated 17.7.2013 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Vigilance, Hazaribagh, in S.T. No.40A of 2002, S.T. No.234 of 2004 and S.T. No.380 of 2004) The State of Jharkhand Vs.1. Kailash Sao 2. Birendra Ram @ Birodhi Ram [Parties in Death Reference No.3 of 2013] Jagarnath Sao @ Jagganath Sao Vs. The State of Jharkhand [Parties in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.708 of 2013] Birendra Ram @ Birodhi Ram Vs. The State of Jharkhand [Parties in Cr. Appeal(DB) No.775 of 2013] Kailash Sao Vs. The State of Jharkhand [Parties in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.931 of 2013] Chetlal Prajapati @ Master Vs. The State of Jharkhand [Parties in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.966 of 2013] PRESENT HONB...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 Criminal Appeal No. 627 of 2002 Against the judgment and order of conviction dated 24.09.2002 and sentence dated 25.09.2002 respectively passed by Sri.Arun Kumar Roy Additional Sessions Judge Dhanbad in Session Trial No. 304 of 1998. ---------- Pramod Kumar Verma S/O Krishna Prasad Verma resident of Jeetpur,P.S Jsors Pokhar Dist.Dhanbad. ...... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent For the Appellant :- Mr. B.K.Jha Advocate For the State :- Mr. Rakesh Kumar A.P.P PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Ratnaker Bhengra C.A.V On 03.07.2015 Delivered on 1-10-2015 Ratnaker Bhengra,J.This Criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 24.9.2002 and order of sentence dated 25.9.2002 in S.T. No. 304 of 1998 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad whereby the above named appellant has been found guilty and convicted under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, though he is acquitted under section 412 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to und...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2006CriLJ3948; [2006(3)JCR270(Jhr)]
D.P. Singh, J.1. The sole appellant Nabiul Hassan has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 28.02.2000 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Pakur in S.T. No. 270 of 1997/2 of 1998 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 366(A) and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years and seven years respectively which shall run concurrently.2. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that one Gauri Devi, minor daughter of Mahabir Prasad Manjhi, P.S. Pakuria distrct Pakur, went missing from her house in the after noon of 7th June 1997. According to informant, father of Gauri Devi, earlier Gauri Devi has gone to see television in the house of one Sohrab Mian, a neighbor. He suspected that the appellant Nabiul Hassan has taken away his daughter for the purpose of marriage. According to him he waited his daughter to return thereafter searched in the night but ultimately when she could not be traced till 13th June 1997 he we...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2008(3)JCR400(Jhr)]
D.K. Sinha, J.1. The petitioner has preferred Criminal Revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act against the order impugned dated 7.2.2005 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court. Dhanbad in M.P. Case No. 96 of 2004 whereby the learned Principal Judge while allowing the petition filed on behalf of the O.P. No 2 in a proceeding under Section 125, CrPC enhanced the amount of maintenance suo motu without consent of the petitioner and beyond the scope of relief as sought for.2. Short fact of the case was that the O.P. No. 2 Achho Devi admitted to be the wife of the petitioner initiated a proceeding under Section 125, CrPC demanding monthly maintenance to the tune of Rs. 1000/- from the petitioner. Though it was admitted by the petitioner husband in respect of a criminal case in which both the parties entered into compromise in Criminal Appeal No. 88 of 1994 with certain terms and conditions laid down in the compromise petition and the same was disposed of by the 1st Addition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2003(4)JCR420(Jhr)]
Tapen Sen, J. 1. The description of the respondents given in this judgment have been taken in exactly the same manner in which they have been described in the Cause Titles of the respective cases. 2. WP (S) Nos. 2459 of 2001, 2808 of 2001, 2973 of 2001, 3016 of 2001 and 4453 of 2001 pertain to the teachers whereas WP (C) Nos. 4392 and 4645 of 2001 relate to the parents/guardians. 3. Save and except WP (C) Nos. 4392 and 4645 of 2001, petitioners of the remaining five cases and who are all teacher-petitioners have prayed for quashing the orders dated 30.5.2001 (which has been brought on record through different annexures such a Annexures 11, 10 series, 7 series, 17 and 17/A and Annexure 3 respectively) passed by the Chairman, ICC Managed Schools. Mosabani Mines Middle School, Mosabani, whereby and whereunder the teachers have been informed that certain posts were found to be redundant and keeping in view the present financial conditions, it had been decided to abolish the posts held by t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : [2004(1)JCR82(Jhr)]
Vishnudeo Narayan, J.1. This appeal at the instance of the appellant named above is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.4.2001 and 23.4.2001 respectively passed in Sessions Trial No. 157 of 2000 T.R. No. 5 of 2000 by Shri Asit Baran Shekhar, 1st Additional Judicial Commissioner-cam-Special Judge, S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the appellant was found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and to pay a fine of Rs. 5.000/- and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and he was further convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under Section 3(2)(v) of the S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. However, bot...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR2084
V.K. Gupta, C.J.1. In this petition filed by the Jharkhand Grih Raksha Vahini Swayam Sewak Sangh, through its Deputy Chairman, the petitioner, who claims to be an Association of the Home Guards, has prayed for various reliefs, inter alia, for issuance of a mandamus to allot the duties to the members of the Home Guards' Association and provide them the uniforms, which have been fixed for the members of the Association, without any charges or payment of any amount, and for a direction upon the appropriate authority to enquire into the matter of allotment of duties in the past and for various other related affairs. It is alleged in the petition that rampant corruption is prevalent in the matter of allotment of duties. to the members of the Force; and that the grievances of the members of the Force are not being redressed.2. It appears that in March, 1959, consequent upon certain decisions taken by the Central Government a purely voluntary organisation was set up and brought into existence...
Tag this Judgment!