Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-18-2002
Reported in : 104(2003)DLT738; 2003(3)SLJ480(Delhi)
Anil Dev Singh, J:1. By this writ petition the petitioner inter alias challenges the order of his discharge from Army service on account of medical disability.2. The petitioner joined Indian Air Force on 27th May, 1986 as Technical Trade Airman. Some time in the year 1981, he was promoted to the rank of Corporal w.e.f. 27th May, 1991. On 3rd January, 1992 he was transferred to 24 Wing, Air Force, also known as Tetra School Air Force.3. In January 1992-93, the petitioner made certain allegations and grievances against his Commanding Officer. Thereafter he submitted an application for redressal of grievance (ROG) against his Commanding Officer. This was followed by several ROGs during the year 1992-93. The allegation of the petitioner has been that he was ill-treated and harassed by his Commanding Officer. His belongings, including his books and papers were stealthily removed. According to the petitioner there was a delay in forwarding the ROGs by the Commanding Officer, Group Captain P....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-16-2002
Reported in : AIR2003Delhi211; (2003)134PLR1
Usha Mehra, J.1. Appellant/plaintiff submitted her tender for the supply of 5000 street light brackets on 4th of June, 1965 to the respondent. The said tender was accepted and the supply order was placed on her on 8th June, 1965. According to the plaintiff, the said supply order contained incomplete information. The details were missing with regard to type of hold to be provided in the refectories. That the complete details were supplied to her only on 9th August, 1965, hence the delay in supply. Moreover for lack of details and delay in furnishing the details she suffered losses. She, thereforee, made claim for the balance payment, damages, interest and refund of the earnest money as well as the price of the goods supplied in excess, total claim amounting to Rs. 14,000/-.2. That the suit of the appellant was contested by the respondent inter alia, on the grounds that complete information was furnished in the supply order dated 8th June, 1965. Moreover as and when any information was s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2002
Reported in : (2002)75TTJ(Del)343
ORDERKeshaw Prasad, A.M.The appeal has been filed by the assessed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), dated 29-12-1998, pertaining to assessment year 1994-95. The first ground of appeal relates to deduction under section 80-O of the Act.2. The assessed- company provides professional services in the field of medicines. It is headed by Dr. N.P.S. Chawla and Dr. (Miss) Devjit Kinberlay Chawla, as directors. The assessed- company got the necessary expertise in the matter of providing emergency medical assistance to any person anywhere in India on call. It has on its own panel several qualified doctors who always remain on call, provide necessary medical services wherever required and give professional information to foreign insurers. It is patronised by almost all the insurance companies in the world and some important select embassies of foreign countries, though no formal agreement exist in some of the cases. After providing required treatment they are also provided qualifie...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-27-2002
Reported in : 101(2002)DLT205
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Eastern Book Company, a well known publishing concern had filed two suits bearing Nos. 624/2000 and 758/2000 before this Court for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, moral rights, unfair competition, damages etc against the respondents.The appellant is a publisher of a well-known journal known as Supreme Court Cases. It allegedly reports all reportable and unreportable judgments of the Supreme Court. In 1996, the second appellant introduced a data based package on CD-ROMs for finding out the Supreme Court ruling known as SCC-Online Case Finder. The respondents launched a software package entitled 'The Laws' and 'Jurix'.The said suits were founded, inter alia, on infringement of copyright and unfair competition. Copyright was claimed in the copy-editing of the judgment. According to the appellant, the respondent had copied the said notes and copied the text of the judgment as published in the SCC and thereby infringed its copyright.2. Various ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2002
Reported in : 100(2002)DLT30
A.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioner who claims himself to be a 'public spirited person' has brought to this Court, by way of this writ petition filed in public interest, the problem of illegal squatting as well as encroachment on the foot-path and roads of Chandni Chowk area resulting into traffic jams as well. The grievance made in me writ petition, in the nutshell, is that non-squatting zones and non-parking areas indicated in the vicinity of Chandni Chowk have been used for huge parking and also used by the vendors for vegetables and fruits sellers. It is stated in the petition that in the following areas, in particular, huge parking and squatting is taking place:(i) Link Road of New Lajpat Rai Market from Red Fort Main Road to Hanuman Mandir Esplanade Road, Chandni Chowk along with Jain Sports Club. (ii) Link Road of South side of New Lajpat Rai Market from Red Fort Road Main to Esplanade Road Cycle Market End along with Parade Ground of Red Fort. (iii) From Cycle Market Police Beat (P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-21-2002
Reported in : 101(2002)DLT471
Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule.With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. The question arising for consideration is whether a doctor, with an M.B.B.S. degree, having deficiently of colour blindness, is to be debarred from pursuing any post graduate Medical Course? The concerned Medical College denied admission to the petitioner in M.D. (Pathology). The Director General of Health Services and the Committee of Experts opined that the petitioner being totally colour blind cannot be considered for admission in Post Graduate Course in Anaesthesiology, Psychiatry and Community Medicine.3. Here are the facts:-(i) Petitioner is a Doctor, who completed his M.B.B.S. from Nalanda Medical College, Patna, Bihar. Petitioner earnestly desired to pursue higher studies. Accordingly he appeared in the All India Quota, Post Graduate Entrance Examination. Results was declared in the month of February, 2002.(ii) Petitioner qualified and ranked at No. 1308. Petitioner opted for th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-26-2002
Reported in : 2003(26)PTC590(Del)
C.K. Mahajan, J.1. By way of present suit, the plaintiff prays for permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants restraining them from manufacturing, selling and offering for sale directly or indirectly dealing in Blankets, Shawls, Lohis and other woollen piece made goods under the trade mark KASHGARI, trade mark Nos. 70, 100, 170, 111, Kailashgari, Vaishali, Alaknanda and Neelgiri and device of a Lamb as well as the mark KASHGIRI as part of their trading style and from any other mark or device which is deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's trade mark and device.2. The plaintiff is a Government company dealing in manufacturing of woollen goods i.e. Kashgari Lohies, Shawls, Lohies, Blankets, Suiting etc. The plaintiff claims to be the user of marks being No. 70 Lohis, No. 100 Lohis, No. 170 Lohis, No. 111 Lohis, Kailashgiri (No. 3542), Alaknanda Lohis, Neelgiri Lohis and Vishali Lohis since 19.11.1974 to 25.5.1985. The plaintiff is the registered proprie...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-19-2002
Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN509(Delhi)
ORDERThe Income Tax Department had filed a criminal complaints under section 276C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioners were summoned. The petitioners appeared in response to summons and they were granted exemption from personal appearance. However, on the next date 15-1-2002, the petitioners who are the resident of Faridabad did not come to the court as they had already been granted exemption the counsel Mr. K.R. Manjani, Advocate through whom the petitioners were exempted from appearance also did not reach the court in time so the exemption was withdrawn and case was listed for 1-4-2002 for pre charge evidence. Later on petitioners moved another application claiming exemption from personal appearance. That application was supported by the affidavits of the counsel for the petitioner wherein it was averred that Mr. K.R. Manjani, Advocate the learned counsel for the petitioner could not reach court in time Novel as he was busy in High Court but his junior Mr. N.P. Mishra, Advocate a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Dec-23-2002
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The complainant, Shri Jai Prakash Saini, has filed the present complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), averring therein that the complainant, an ex-serviceman, re-employed with the Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi as a Clerk-cum-Coin Note Examiner, in August, 1997 suffered stomach ailment, consulted the Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi, for treatment, who, after examining the complainant, gave treatment which provided only temporary relief to the complainant and gradually two glands on the neck and one gland on the left side of the face of the complainant appeared. The Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, under whose treatment the complainant was, after a few days of medication advised the complainant to consult some surgical specialist. On the advice of the Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, the complainant approached the doctor at the Armed Forces C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2002
Reported in : (2002)81ITD160(Delhi)
1. The appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), dt 29th Dec., 1998, pertaining to asst. yr. 1994-95. The first ground of appeal relates to deduction under Section 80-O of the Act.2. The assessee-company provides professional services in the field of medicines. It is headed by Dr. N.P.S. Chawla and Dr. (Miss) Devjit Kinberlay Chawla, as directors. The assessee-company got the necessary expertise in the matter of providing emergency medical assistance to any person anywhere in India on call. It has on its own panel several qualified doctors who always remain on call, provide necessary medical services wherever required and give professional information to foreign insurers. It is patronised by almost all the insurance companies in the world and some important select embassies of foreign countries, though no formal agreement exist in some of the cases. After providing required treatment they are also provided qualified doctor to escort them back to their dest...
Tag this Judgment!