Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on : Dec-23-2002
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The complainant, Shri Jai Prakash Saini, has filed the present complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), averring therein that the complainant, an ex-serviceman, re-employed with the Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi as a Clerk-cum-Coin Note Examiner, in August, 1997 suffered stomach ailment, consulted the Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi, for treatment, who, after examining the complainant, gave treatment which provided only temporary relief to the complainant and gradually two glands on the neck and one gland on the left side of the face of the complainant appeared. The Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, under whose treatment the complainant was, after a few days of medication advised the complainant to consult some surgical specialist. On the advice of the Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, the complainant approached the doctor at the Armed Forces C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Mar-13-2002
Reported in : (2002)81ITD160(Delhi)
1. The appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), dt 29th Dec., 1998, pertaining to asst. yr. 1994-95. The first ground of appeal relates to deduction under Section 80-O of the Act.2. The assessee-company provides professional services in the field of medicines. It is headed by Dr. N.P.S. Chawla and Dr. (Miss) Devjit Kinberlay Chawla, as directors. The assessee-company got the necessary expertise in the matter of providing emergency medical assistance to any person anywhere in India on call. It has on its own panel several qualified doctors who always remain on call, provide necessary medical services wherever required and give professional information to foreign insurers. It is patronised by almost all the insurance companies in the world and some important select embassies of foreign countries, though no formal agreement exist in some of the cases. After providing required treatment they are also provided qualified doctor to escort them back to their dest...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on : Nov-01-2002
Reported in : (2003)85ITD478(Delhi)
1. These two appeals--one by the assessee and the other by the Revenue emanate from the order passed by the CIT(A) on 4th Dec., 2000, in relation to asst. yr. 1997-98. As both the appeals are emerging out of the same order, we are, therefore, proceeding to dispose of both these appeals by a consolidated order for the sake of convenience.Briefly stated the facts of the case, as collected from the orders of the authorities below, statement of facts and other material before us, are that the assessee-company, incorporated in and a resident of Hongkong was deriving lease income from lease of transponder capacity.It was engaged in operating telecommunication satellites located in US stationary orbit of 36,000 kms above equator in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the International Telecommunication Union under the United Nations. In the year under consideration it operated two satellites available at its disposal, namely, Asiasat-I, taken by the assessee on lease located at 10...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-21-2002
Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)148; 97(2002)DLT756; 2003(1)SLJ111b(Delhi)
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1.The petitioner in this case was a Gunner working in the office of respondent No.3. He proceeded on 36 days's annual leave from 26 th January 1992 to 3rd March 1993. The said leave was allegedly sanctioned by the respondent No.3. Allegedly, while availing the said leave, he fell into a 'Khud' in his village on 26 the February 1992, as a consequence whereof, he sustained contusion in his right leg. He was taken to the nearby doctor at Thural, Himachal Pradesh and he was under his treatment from 26 the February 1992 to 9 the March 1992. He allegedly was admitted to the Government Medical College at Thural wherein also he remained under treatment from 10 th March 1992 to 15 th 1992. A purported information to the said effect was sent tot he Commanding Officer of the Unit of the petitioner. The petitioner rejoined his duties on 23rd April 1992 and produced his medical certificate. On 25th April 1992, he was informed that he would be tried by a Summary Court Martial.The cha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2002
Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)477; 2002(3)Crimes370; 97(2002)DLT594; 2002(62)DRJ578
R.C. Chopra, J. 1. The petitioner is the main accused in case, commonly known as 'Jessica Lal Murder Case'. According to the prosecution, the petitioner had fired two bullet shots, one of which hit the deceased Jessica Lal resulting in her death. Shri Ram Jethmalani, Senior Advocate, while pressing for regular bail to the petitioner, has pointed out that all the three alleged eye-witnesses have failed to support the prosecution case and as such, there is no evidence whatsoever against the petitioner to connect him with the offence. He also contends that the prosecution case suffers from an inherent infirmity inasmuch as according to one of their own experts, the two bullets alleged to have been fired at the spot were fired by two weapons and not one, as alleged by the prosecution. According to him, the prosecution is merely flogging a dead horse knowing fully well that the petitioner is not likely to be convicted and as such, the petitioner deserves to be enlarged on regular bail. 2. I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-08-2002
Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)699; 98(2002)DLT364; 2002(63)DRJ538; 2002(84)ECC193
K.S. Gupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13th March, 2001 and order dated 15th March 2001 of an Additional Sessions Judge convicting the appellant-accused under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the 'Act') and sentencing him to undergo RI for 10 years and pay a fine of Rs. 1 lac.2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 16th August, 1999 around 2.15 PM ASI Chander Pal Singh, PW-9 Along with HCs Om Prakash, PW-7, Harpal Singh and Const. Rajvir Singh were present in connection with patrolling at E.E. Block Bus Stand, Outer Ring Road and there PW-9 received secret information that a person by the name of Rameshwar having heroin, would go to Maksudpur village via Maksudpur chowk. PW-9 organized a raiding party consisting of said police officials with him. PW-4 Sher Singh from public who agreed to join raid, was also included in raiding party. Nakabandi was made near Maksudpur chowk. Appellant reached Maksudpur ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-30-2002
Reported in : 2002(63)DRJ604; [2004]138STC264(Delhi)
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. Legality and validity of a circular issued by the Commissioner of Sales Tax dated 8th March 2000 is in question in this writ petition. The basic fact of the matter is not in dispute. The petitioner has been carrying on business in the manufacture and sale of master batches. It is contended that the said item is a raw material used in the plastic industry for manufacture of plastic goods. Whenever plastic goods are manufactured which are required to be coloured, master batches which is a viable and convenient raw material is used as coloring agent.2. On or about 1st April 1998, a notification was issued by the Lt. Governor in terms whereof 3% tax was levied on taxable turnover on plastic material. The table prescribing First Point Taxable Goods was also amended by a notification of the same date in terms whereof plastic raw material became liable to tax at first point. The petitioner filed a return and the Sales Tax Officer accepted the contention of the petitioner th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-10-2002
Reported in : 2002(25)PTC262(Del)
A.K.Sikri, J.1. Sex is an inescapable part of us. It is there from the moment of birth when we are given a sexual identity - boy or girl - and it is with us until the day we die - when it goes on the death certificate.2. Ever since Adam and Eve ate forbidden apple and were transported to earth, sex has become basic human instinct. Among other creatures copulation may be only a biological act - for procreation. However, for human beings, sexual intercourse is not only procreative. It is creative as well. It has been described as 'the greatest driving force in the living world'.2. No wonder then, that much is written about it. From time immemorial. On how to enjoy it most. On how to continue to enjoy and be sexually active even at advanced stage of life. Vatsyayana's 'Kamasutra' has placed him among the immortals and no better elegy or eulogy can be written than the following lines:'So long as lips shall kiss and eyes shall see. So long lives This, and This gives life to Thee'.3. Tantra ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-17-2002
Reported in : 98(2002)DLT348; 2003(66)DRJ38
S.L. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.'), petitioner is seeking quashing of the complaint (Kalandra), under Section 103 of the Delhi Police Act, (for short, 'D.P.Act'), and the proceedings thereon pending trial in the court of ACMM, Delhi.2. The allegations in brief, are that Anti-kidnapping cell of the Police received information that the petitioner, who is working as a beldar (labourer), in the MCD, has been indulging in illegal activities of bringing arms and drugs from the Nepal border; and that some cash and other articles are lying burred in his jhuggi at Vijay Nagar. The information was recorded vide DD No. 7 dated 10.7.97 at P.S. R.K. Puram and was also brought to the notice of Senior Officers. The police visited the jhuggi but it was found locked. The report was kept pending. On 11.7.97 at 6:30 a.m. the police again received information that the petitioner was available at jhuggi. The police party proce...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2002
Reported in : 2002(150)ELT71(Del)
S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. This writ petition is directed against Orders dated 29.05.2001 and 14.09.2001 passed by the Customs, & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Appellate Tribunal') 2. The petitioner is a partnership firm. It is engaged in manufacture of shoes. During the relevant year, namely, 12.08.1991 to 31.03.1994, the petitioner firm was having two units; unit No. 1 located at 4/33, Reshham Katra, Tajganj, Agra and unit No. 2 at 4/37, First, Reshham Katra Tajganj, Agra. The distance between the two premises was only 2000 feet. 3. Shoes used to be manufactured with the aid of power in unit No. 2, whereas the same was done without the aid of power in unit No. 1. According to the petitioner, the position inter-changed. 4. Footwear 'in or in relation to the manufacture of which any process is ordinarily carried with the aid of power'is classifiable in sub-heading 6401.11 of the Central Excise Tariff ( in short, 'the Tariff'). It is thus liable for central...
Tag this Judgment!