Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances amdndment act 2001 section 28 amendment of section 62 Page 6 of about 383 results (0.767 seconds)

Sukh Ram Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)99ITD417(Delhi)

..... . dr. t.a. quershi[2005] 146 taxman 251 wherein it has been held that loss from seizure of heroin possessed by a doctor in contravention of the provisions of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act could not be allowed as business expenditure in view of explanation to section 37.50. the other contention raised by the learned counsel for the assessee, which is .....

National Investigation Agency Vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... have some bearing while considering the prayer for bail in relation to offences under the 1967 act as well. notably, under the special enactments such as tada, mcoca and the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, the court is required to record its opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. there .....

K.S.Panduranga Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... had dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant who had called in question the legal propriety of his conviction for the offence punishable under section 8/18(b) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 and such other offences. this court observed that when the appeal was called, the counsel who was appointed through the legal aid committee did not appear .....

Hasan Ismail Dalvi Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)1445; 2001BomCR(Cri)761; (2001)2BOMLR875

..... the lines that the officer is also required to reduce into writing his personal knowledge, on the basis of which he reasonably believes that any narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence about commission ..... accused no. 3. the statements are thus admissible in evidence. those are not hit by article 20(3) of the constitution of india. the officers of narcotic control bureau, although officers in authority to some extent, are not police personnel and therefore if such statements happen to contain self-incriminating or confessional material, ..... additional paragraph incorporating proposed action lends support to the deposition of shri sawant that he had placed this information before his superior i.e. deputy director. narcotics cell shri r. n. kakkar.it is not the claim of shri sawant that he had prepared copies of information and sent those to his immediate .....

R. Mayilvahanam S/O Ramaiah Pillai and Vs. Intelligence Officer, Narco ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4425; ILR2008KAR4166; ILR2008(4)Kar4166; 2008(4)KCCRSN251; 2008(5)AIRKarR408; 2008CriLJ4425;

..... on record and taking note of entry 56 and entry 239 of the notification dated 19.10.2001 issued by the central government for each of the narcotic drugs/psychotropic substances listed therein, the court held that what is to be seen is the content of heroin by weight in the mixture and not weight of the ..... where he has reason to believe an offence punishable under this act has been committed, in a 'public place', he has the power to proceed to seize any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance. the expression 'public place' has been explained to include any public conveyance, hotel, shop or other place intended for use by, or accessible to, the public ..... order of the state governments if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information green by any person and taken down in writing that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance in respect of which an offence punishable under this act has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish .....

iqbal Moosa Patel S/O. Mohammed Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2008)2GLR1598

..... recording the conviction of the appellants-accused for the offences under section 8(c), read with sections 21 and 29, of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'ndps act') for possession and illegal smuggling and trafficking of heroin as a part of the conspiracy. the appellant in criminal appeal no. ..... for one year. 2. the facts of the prosecution case, briefly summarized, are that a conspiracy was hatched for interstate smuggling and trafficking/transportation of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (heroin). a secret information was received by mr. k.c. chudasma, inspector, anti-terrorist squad, which he passed on to mr. vipul ..... that a secret information at exh.135 was received by mr. k.c. chudasama, police inspector, ats, gujarat state, about the illicit trafficking of narcotics drugs and psychotropic substance (brown sugar) in a truck bearing registration no. rj-04-g-1305, which was forwarded to the zonal director, ncb, ahmedabad by the .....

Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2254; 2008AIRSCW5964; 2008(4)LH(SC)2896

..... section 52 provides for disposal of persons arrested and articles seized. section 52a provides for disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; sub-section (2) whereof reads as under:(2) where any narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances has been seized and forwarded to the officer in charge of the nearest police station or to the ..... contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not ..... the court to impose fine of more than maximum punishment of rs.2,00,000/- as also the presumption of guilt emerging from possession of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, the extent of burden to prove the foundational facts on the prosecution, i.e., `proof beyond all reasonable doubt' would be more .....

Fredrick George Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4600

..... a bag which was being carried by the appellant. therefore, this cannot be said to be a case where on search of the person of the accused, a narcotic drug or psychotropic drug was found. in our opinion, the courts below have correctly held that the appellant is guilty of committing the said offence. the appeal is, therefore, dismissed. 16 ..... magistrate, now stands overruled by the decision in baldev singh's case. if a person is carrying a bag or some other article with him and a narcotic drug or a psychotropic substance is found from it, it cannot be said that it was found from his 'person.' in this case heroin was found from a bag belonging to ..... -8-2000 passed by the learned special judge, kullu, whereby the appellant-accused (hereafter referred to as 'the accused') has been convicted under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereafter referred to as 'the act') and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of rs. .....

Raman Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001CriLJ800; 2001(2)WLC632; 2000(3)WLN39

..... state of rajasthan, has urged that in the instant case, the gujarat police got the information from pali that the complainant was corning to gujarat with narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance. the complainant was arrested from pali. the shop (the subject matter of the main controversy) was situated at pali and the complainant had been ..... to offences under sections 120b, 195, 196, 342, 347, 357, 368, 388, 482 i.p.c. and sections 17, 58(1)(2) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter called the 'n.d.p.s. act').(3). the facts and circumstances giving rise to these cases are that on 17.10.1996, ..... the hour, the parliament has enacted the n.d.p.s. act with a view to eliminate drug addiction and illegal trafficking in drugs by providing stringent punishment for the production, manufacture, possession and sale of drugs and psychotropic substances. section 58 safeguards the innocent persons from arrest and search by providing punishment for vexatious entry, .....

Yogesh M. Vyas Vs. Registrar, High Court of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2009)1GLR14

Mohit S. Shah, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the High Court order dated 27-4-2005 and the Government notification dated 16-8-2005 compulsorily retiring the petitioner, a Judicial Officer holding the post of Civil Judge (S.D.) and Judicial Magistrate First Class, from service after a disciplinary inquiry.2. The facts leading to filing of this petition, briefly stated, are as under:2.1. The petitioner who was born on 7-5-1955, joined judicial service on 9-11-1981. After his appointment to the post of Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C, the petitioner was posted at Navsari, and was thereafter, transferred to different places, such as Pardi, Valsad, Devdhar, Bharuch, Savli, Visnagar and Baroda. The petitioner was thereafter promoted to the post of Civil Judge (S.D.) on 10-6-1996 and was posted at Amreli.2.2. The petitioner was placed under suspension by order dated 16-12-1997 (which order was implemented on 17-12-1997) in view of the contemplated ...