Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68a application Page 1 of about 20 results (0.157 seconds)

Jokhu Lal Vs. Central Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1052

..... it. in this connection learned counsel for the state also placed before this court the provisions of section 68a(2)(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as pit ndps act). it is urged that this provision relating to forfeiture of property derived from, or used in, illicit traffic was made applicable even against ..... the persons in respect of whom the order of detention had been made under ndps act and the proviso to sub-section (c) made it ..... . it has been argued on behalf of the state that in a few cases where this court had allowed a habeas corpus petition filed under the pit ndps act only on the ground that less than a month's period was to expire and the petitioner was directed to be released forthwith, such persons had made .....

Present: Mr. Surinder Garg Advocate Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... namely gurmail singh was apprehended by the police for carrying opium without permit and subsequently the father of the petitioner was charge- sheeted under sections 18/61/85 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short 'act') and faced the trial. during the pendency of the trial, the petitioner, being a son of gurmail singh, who was apprehended by the .....

Mrs. Kailashbai and Mrs. Puneet Kalra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT118

..... granted to any of the detenus specially when the bail application of nikku singh had already been rejected on 12-5-2006. section 37 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act reads as follows:37. offences to be cognizable and non-bailable.- (1) notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 ..... civil liabilities under safema as also to protect his own reputation.7. our attention has been invited to the provisions contained in section 68a of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 providing for forfeiture of the property derived from or used in illicit traffic. provisions apply to the persons specified in sub-section ..... -joint secretary to the government of india in purported exercise of the power granted by section 3(1) of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). in pursuance of the said order, grounds were simultaneously served on the detenu stating .....

Aslam Mohd. Merchant Vs. Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)KLT400; 2008(II)OLR(SC)393; 2008(10)SCALE383; 2008(2)LC855(SC); 2008AIRSCW4868; 2008CriLJ3621; 2008(3)Crimes122

..... brought on records.14. the relevant provisions of the smugglers and foreign exchange manipulators (forfeiture of property) act, 1976 (for short 'safema') and narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps) are in pari materia.15. contentions were raised that the show cause notice shows complete non-application of mind on the ..... conference at vienna in february, 1971 ; and (d) any other international convention, or protocol or other instrument amending an international convention, relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances which may be ratified or acceded to by india after the commencement of this act.8. section 68a of the act applies to persons specified ..... authority that acquisition of the property by them has nothing to do with the purported income derived by `mirchi' out of illicit trafficking of narcotic, drug and psychotropic substances.on behalf of the appellants, it was furthermore urged:(i) even a perusal of from the order passed by the competent authority, it .....

Virendra Kumar Rai and Others Vs. Competent Authority

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in : (1998)233ITR11Luck

..... , the appellant in f.p.a. no. nd-8/lkw of 1996 was detained under section 3(1) of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988 (pitndps), under a detention order dated april 4, 1990, for illicit trafficking in ndps, in which a reference was made by an ..... that a separate legislation should be enacted for preventive detention of persons engaged in any kind of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances." 11. apart from imposing punishments on drug traffickers by virtue of the ndps act, the activities of illicit traffickers were sought to be prevented by virtue of section 3 of the pitndps act ..... to a charge against a person accused of committing an offence of illicit traffic in relation to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances as defined by clause (viiia) of section 2 of the ndps act. under the provisions of the ndps act, no detention is contemplated and hence no person engaged in illicit traffic can be detained under the .....

Ansar Rahman and Others Vs. Competent Authority

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT IT

Reported in : (1999)239ITR12ITAT

1. these appeals are by ansar rahman, his daughter, wife and son, respectively, challenging the order of the competent authority, calcutta, passed under section 68-1(3) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps), whereby the properties of ansar rahman were forfeited.2. the appellant, ansar rahman, was convicted on july 30, 1988, for offences punishable under the provisions of ..... were incorporated into the main act by way of amendment, to serve as strong deterrent to illicit traffic in the narcotic drugs. one of the very serious consequences for subsequent conviction for engaging or abetting in the production, manufacture, etc., of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances was the imposition of sentence punishable with death under section 9 of the amendment act.another provision which was .....

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT559

..... received information on 5.5.2008 from an informer about a group of persons dealing in illicit smuggling of prescription drugs listed in the schedule of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps act). the names of the persons intimated were (i) shri rajesh sharma of shakarpur, delhi (ii) shri diwakar ..... concealment, use or consumption, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or transshipment, of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances; (iv) dealing in any activities in narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances other than those provided in sub-clauses (i) to (iii); or(v) handling or letting any premises for the ..... on export.-(1) subject to the provisions of sub-rule (2), no person shall export any of the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or preparation containing any of such narcotic drug or psychotropic substance specified in schedule ii to the countries or to the region of such country specified therein.(2) notwithstanding .....

Rajinder Gupta Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006CriLJ674; 123(2005)DLT55; 2005(84)DRJ477

..... the central government by notification in the official gazette.'by a notification dated 19th october, 2001 the central government specified the 'small quantity' and 'commercial quantity' of each of the narcotics drugs/psychotropic substances listed therein. in the table appended to the said notification, at entry no. 169, buprenorphine has been specified and the small quantity has been mentioned as 1 gram whereas ..... poppy or any cannabis plant; or(c) produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import interstate, export interstate, import into india, export from india or transship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance,except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this act or the rules or orders made there under .....

State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC2378; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)279; 1999CriLJ3672; 1999(65)ECC695; 1999LC545(SC); [1999(81)FLR303]; (1999)3GLR2483; JT1999(4)SC595; (1999)ILLJ254SC; 1999(II)OLR(SC)474; 199

..... of a country. it has the effect of producing a sick society and harmful culture. anti-drug justice is a criminal dimension of social justice. the united nations conventions against illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances which was held in vienna, austria in 1988 was perhaps one of the first efforts, ..... at an international level, to tackle the menace of drug trafficking throughout the comity of nations. the government of india has ..... was divergence of opinion between different benches of this court with regard to the ambit and scope of section 50 of narcotic drugs and - psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter 'ndps act') and in particular with regard to the admissibility of the evidence collected by an investigating officer during search and seizure conducted .....

Mansukhbhai Lavjibhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2707

..... , rajkot, in n.d.p.s. case no. 104 of 2000 whereby the appellant is convicted of the offence punishable under section 21 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 [the ndps act] and sentenced to suffer r.i. for a period of ten years and a fine of rs. 1 lac, in default, r.i. of ..... of conviction against the appellant came to be recorded under section 21 of the ndps act. it is true that charas which was found from the possession of the appellant is neither psychotropic substance nor manufactured drug and, therefore, provisions of sections 22 & 21 of the ndps act would not be attracted to the facts of the present case. however, there ..... entitled to be acquitted of the offence punishable under section 21 of the ndps act. the learned counsel further contended that substance found from possession of the appellant i.e. charas is neither psychotropic substance within the meaning of section 22 of the act nor manufactured drug within the meaning of section 21 of the act and, therefore, .....