Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 65 omitted Sorted by: recent Page 7 of about 1,667 results (0.174 seconds)

Mar 28 2023 (SC)

Union Of India Vs. Ajay Kumar Singh @ Pappu

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... alleged to be involved in case no.687/2021 arising out of case no.1/2021 under sections 8/20/27-a/29/32 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short the ndps act ), police station-d.r.i., varanasi.5. the respondent-accused has been directed to be released on bail by the impugned order keeping in ..... two accused persons.14. this apart, it is noticed that the high court, in passing the impugned order of bail, had lost sight 7 of section 37 of the ndps act, which, inter alia, provides that no person accused of an offence involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail unless the twin conditions laid down therein are satisfied, ..... all through on his mobile number. the facts as unfurled from the complaint/fir and the statements of the above two accused persons recorded under section 67 of the ndps act reveals that respondent-accused is the kingpin and the organiser of the illicit trade in ganja.12. it is on record that the respondent-accused has been involved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2023 (SC)

Royden Harold Buthello Vs. The State Of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... not interfered by the high court.5. the brief facts leading to the above appeals are that the appellant no.1 is accused of indulging in sale of psychotropic ndps substance, due to which the prosecuting agency under the respondent no.1 has registered the firs no.232/2020 and 255/2020 and are proceeding in the ..... criminal revision petition filed by the appellant herein, before the high court assailing the legality and correctness of the order dated 14.07.2021 passed by the special judge under ndps act at raipur in special case no.98/2020 whereby the appellants application filed under section 227 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (for short, crpc ) was ..... azad chowk police, raipur and kotwali police, raipur filed pursuant 2 to the said firs no.232/2020 and 255/2020, pending before the learned special judge under ndps act, raipur. the further direction which was prayed is for the cbi to submit a periodical progress report of the investigation to the court and to monitor the same.4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2023 (SC)

Stalin @ Satalin Samuvel Vs. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and 11 belonged to the other group. according to the prosecution, they thus developed enmity towards the 2 deceased. accused no.1 was arrested in a case under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 and accused no.11 was arrested in a case under the ipc and they strongly believed that they were arrested only on the instigation of the deceased .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2023 (HC)

Mr Sayyad Mohammad @ Nasim Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... city, for the offence punishable under sections 25 and 3 of indian arms act, 1959 and sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(b) of narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 ( the ndps act for short).2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned high court government pleader appearing for the respondent-state.3. this court earlier ..... & ors. in criminal appeal no.1397 of2007dated 31.03.2009 and brought to notice of this court para no.10, the manner in which a sample of narcotic drug would have to be taken and contend that seizure itself is not proper.8. this court would like to rely upon the judgment of the apex court in ..... /at abdulla manzil venkatesh layout, near hanafi masjid, kushal nagar kodagu district-571 234. petitioner (by sri s. balakrishnan, advocate) and: state of karnataka by economic and narcotic crime, police station, mangaluru city-575 001 represented by spp, high court building, bengaluru-560 001. respondent (by sri h.s.shankar, hcgp) this criminal petition is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2022 (HC)

Sri Rangappa Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

..... purpose of determining whether it would constitute small quantity or commercial quantity, is not a good law. 12.2. in case of seizure of mixture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances with one or more neutral substance(s), the quantity of neutral substance(s) is not to be excluded and to be taken into consideration along ..... 2, has observed as under:7. "12.1. the decision of this court in e. micheal raj taking the view that in the mixture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance with one or more neutral substance(s), the quantity of the neutral substance(s) is not to be taken into consideration while determining the small ..... honble2principal civil judge (sr.dn.) and cjm court, channagiri vide annexure d for the offences punishable under sections20a)(i), 20(b)(ii)(a) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act1985is registered by the respondent no.1 (basavapatna police station) in so far as petitioner is concerned by allowing the petition. this criminal petition having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2022 (SC)

Sukhpal Singh Khaira Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .2015 a first information report was lodged in the police station sadar, jalalabad against 11 accused for the offence under sections 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29 and 30 of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985 ( ndps for short), section 25-a of arms act and section 66 of the information technology act, 2000 ( it act for short). in the charge sheet dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2022 (SC)

B.a. Umesh Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... involved in a murder case. they are all under trial prisoners.4. the remaining two cells are occupied by one person each i.e, akash desai convicted for offence under ndps act for 10 years. southern most cell is occupied by death convict shri. b.a. umesh. they informed that they are in the said cells for the last 3 months to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2022 (HC)

Shri. Hrishikesh Devdikar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... .6. while hearing the application under section 22 of the kcoca which is in parametria to section 43 of the unlawful activities prevention act, maharashtra organized control of crime act, narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, notice ought to have been issued to 2 (1985)1 scc561- 11 - wp no.2997 of 2021 the petitioner and an opportunity to be provided to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2022 (SC)

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... several obligations which are not covered under the earlier three enactments. thus, it was felt that there was an urgent need for the enactment of a comprehensive legislation of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.25. the 1985 act defined opium , opium derivative , opium poppy , poppy straw and poppy straw concentrate under clauses (xv), (xvi), (xvii), ( ..... to what was the species of the contraband recovered?.2. since the answer to the aforesaid questions have a bearing on a number of cases under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 1985 act ), this court, vide its order dated 14th august 2018, had requested shri p.s ..... of the duty to prevent and combat this evil and understanding that such a universal action calls for an international co-operation, the single convention on narcotic drugs, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 1961 27 convention ) was resolved. it was further amended by the 1972 protocol. it will be relevant to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2022 (SC)

The State Of Manipur Vs. Buyamayum Abdul Hanan @ Anand

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... against the decision of the high court of manipur dated 28th october, 2021 and 16th september, 2021 setting aside the order of detention passed under prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the act 1988 ) on the premise that the appellants failed to supply the legible copies of documents which were relied upon by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //