Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 65 omitted Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 44 results (0.081 seconds)

Pappu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)MPHT40

..... 4-3-1993 passed by the special judge, sagar in special case no. 2/92 whereby the accused/appellant has been convicted under section 8(c)/20(b)(i) of narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short 'the act') and sentenced r.i. for one year and fine of rs. 2,000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo further r ..... from his bajaj priya scooter. thus total 65 grams ganja was seized. the accused was arrested. the fir was recorded wherein the crime no. 57/92 under section 8/20, ndps act was registered against the accused. the seized articles were sent for chemical analysis of fsl, sagar. the report from fsl, sagar confirmed the seized articles to be ganja. after completing .....

Smt. Shyama Bai Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4088; 2001(3)MPLJ205

..... orderarun mishra, j.1. the appellant stands convicted under section 17 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ndps act') and she has been sentenced to undergo 10 years' r.i. for allegedly possessing 50 grams of opium on 30-10-1987.2. prosecution alleges that on 30-10- ..... any doubt of the illicit articles under the act and this provision was engrafted having regard to the grave consequential that may entail the possession of illicit articles under the ndps act, namely the shifting of the onus to the accused and the severe punishment to which he becomes liable.where accused himself wanted to be searched before a gazetted officer ..... appearing for the appellant shri p. rusia submits that it is a case where there is total breach of mandatory provisions of section 50 and 52a(2) of the ndps act. her personal search could not be taken by male person. the recovery from the possession of the appellant is not proved. she is an aged woman of nearly 80 .....

Gulam Nabi Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... special case no. 16/2004, decided on 26-05-2006 by the special judge (ndps) whereby, the appellant was convicted for the offence under section 8/21 (c) of the ndps act and has been sentenced to undergo 11 years ri besides payment of fine of rs.1 lac with default sentence. he has also been convicted for the offense under section ..... 8/18(b) of ndps act and has been sentenced to undergo 13 years ri with fine of rs.2 lacs with default sentence. both the sentences to run concurrently. 2. learned counsel appearing for the ..... mahebub khan pathan vs. state of gujarat, reported in (2013) 1 scc 570, wherein the appellant was convicted in that case under sections 8 (c), 21 and 29 of the ndps act and was sentenced to undergo ri for 15 years with fine of rs.1.5 lacs each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo ri for 3 .....

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mushgtaq @ Mubarik Judgement Given ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... in special case no.1/2007 whereby respondent has been acquitted of charges leveled against him under section 8/20 of narcotics drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985. it is said that the sub inspector, police station harda received information on telephone that respondent is going on hero honda motorcycle and is carrying ganja. he .....

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Munnalal Mishra Judgement Given By: ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... in special case no.6/2007 whereby respondent has been acquitted of charges leveled against him under section 8(g) and 20(kha)(ii).of narcotics drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985. it is said that the police authorities through a informer on 26.9.2007 received information with regard to illegal storage of ganja in the residential house .....

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Shakir Mohammad @ Babbu Judgement G ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... no.67/2009 whereby the respondent was acquitted from the charge of offence punishable under section 8 read with section 20(b)(ii)(b) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as the ndps act ).the prosecution's case in short is that on 3.11.2009 a.s.i.ramdev urmaliya (pw7).who was posted at police station kamarji, ..... . the entires of the rojnamcha is shown at items no.71 to 82 in a continuous manner. a.s.i.ramdev urmaliya did not follow the provisions of the ndps act and its rules. he sent the intimation to the sdop concerned on the wireless and thereafter, a returned wireless was received, sent by sdop in the rojnamcha available in ..... of the respondent was taken on that memo and therefore, it would be apparent that the a.s.i.ramdev urmaliya flouted the provisions of section 50 of the ndps act. similarly shri urmaliya prepared the documents ex.p/26 a document for taking sample and sealing the entire property and also the seizure memo ex.p/27 but in .....

Nandu Alias Anand Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given B ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... day of january, 2014) the appellant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 12.11.2010 passed by the learned special judge under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act (in short 'ndps act'), shahdol in special case no.22/2008, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under section 20 (b) (ii) (b) of ..... ndps act and sentenced for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of rs.50,000/-. in default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment for 6 ..... 5 - criminal appeal no.1496 of 2012 8. on the basis of the aforesaid discussion, it would be apparent that shri tripathi followed the various provisions of ndps act and rules. there is no illegality visible by which any advantage can be given to the appellant. it was proved beyond doubt that the appellant was transporting 1 .....

Raisingh Tanwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... hereby decided by this common judgment.2. the appellants are convicted for the offence punishable under section 8/21 (b) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985 (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'ndps act') vide judgment dated 28.7.2011 in -:- 2 -:- criminal appeal no.1713 of 2011 criminal appeal no.1866 of 2011 ..... discussion, the appeals filed by the appellants are hereby partly allowed. the conviction directed against the appellants for offence punishable under section 8/21 (b) of ndps act is hereby maintained but, sentence of both the appellants is reduced to the period for which they remained in the custody. however, fine imposed upon the ..... testimony of sub inspector sanjay dubey (p.w.6) appears to be believable. he has followed the various principles of investigation as mentioned in various provisions of ndps act. his testimony was duly corroborated by head constable vijaypal singh (p.w.3), constable prakash singh (p.w.4) and other witnesses. he sent the information .....

Kailash Kirar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... hereby decided by this common judgment.2. the appellants are convicted for the offence punishable under section 8/21 (b) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985 (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'ndps act') vide judgment dated 28.7.2011 in -:- 2 -:- criminal appeal no.1713 of 2011 criminal appeal no.1866 of 2011 ..... discussion, the appeals filed by the appellants are hereby partly allowed. the conviction directed against the appellants for offence punishable under section 8/21 (b) of ndps act is hereby maintained but, sentence of both the appellants is reduced to the period for which they remained in the custody. however, fine imposed upon the ..... testimony of sub inspector sanjay dubey (p.w.6) appears to be believable. he has followed the various principles of investigation as mentioned in various provisions of ndps act. his testimony was duly corroborated by head constable vijaypal singh (p.w.3), constable prakash singh (p.w.4) and other witnesses. he sent the information .....

Kailash Kirar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... hereby decided by this common judgment.2. the appellants are convicted for the offence punishable under section 8/21 (b) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985 (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'ndps act') vide judgment dated 28.7.2011 in -:- 2 -:- criminal appeal no.1713 of 2011 criminal appeal no.1866 of 2011 ..... discussion, the appeals filed by the appellants are hereby partly allowed. the conviction directed against the appellants for offence punishable under section 8/21 (b) of ndps act is hereby maintained but, sentence of both the appellants is reduced to the period for which they remained in the custody. however, fine imposed upon the ..... testimony of sub inspector sanjay dubey (p.w.6) appears to be believable. he has followed the various principles of investigation as mentioned in various provisions of ndps act. his testimony was duly corroborated by head constable vijaypal singh (p.w.3), constable prakash singh (p.w.4) and other witnesses. he sent the information .....