Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 28 punishment for attempts to commit offences Court: delhi Page 1 of about 132 results (0.122 seconds)

Sandeep Kumar vs.central Bureau of Narcotics

Court : Delhi

..... that is relevant?. clearly, then, it would qualify as a small quantity. therefore, in a mixture of a narcotic drug or a psychotropic substance with one or more neutral substances, the quantity of the neutral substance or substances is not to be taken in considering whether a small quantity or a commercial quantity of the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance is recovered. only the actual content by weight of the narcotic drug or the psychotropic substance (as the case may be) is relevant for determining whether it would constitute a small quantity or a commercial ..... , if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken in writing that any person has committed an offence punishable under this act or that any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or control substance in respect of which any offence punishable under this act has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the commission of such offence .....

Michael Gorden Kingsbury Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)641; 54(1994)DLT685

..... control bureau (hereinafter referred toas'ncb') filed a complaint dated 22.1.1987 against michael gordon kingsbury and ms. helen anne cooper for the offences punishable under sections 20,23 and 28 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as 'the ndps act'). the case came up before theadditional sessions judge, new delhi on 8.5.1987 when the following charges were framed against them :-charge framed against michael gordon kingsbury:--'firstly that on 12. ..... corroborated by other witnesses also, as held in piara singh v. state of punjab : 1977crilj1941 however, even such confessional statements, in my view, can not be considered sufficient for conviction in view of the fact that violation of section 50 of ndps act vitiates the trial as such. if the trial gets vitiated on account of non-compliance of section 50, can there be conviction on the basis of the confessional statements,alleged to have been made by the accused after the alleged recovery when they .....

State Govt of Nct of Delhi Vs. Khalil Ahmed

Court : Delhi

..... or not. out of remaining 16 cases 2 cases vide fir no.183/2006 and 96/2006 pertain to the offence punishable under section 25 of the arms act, 1959. one case vide fir no.09/04 pertain to section 20 of ndps act. therefore, the prosecution failed to establish that the respondent has committed an offence either as a member of organized crime syndicate or on behalf of such syndicate. as regards the properties to invoke section 4 of the mcoca, the prosecution failed to show prima facie that the respondent ..... organised crime or not. out of remaining 16 cases, two cases (fir no.183/2006 and 96/2006) pertained to the offence punishable under section 25 of the arms act, 1959. one case (fir no. 09/2004) pertained to section 20 of ndps act. 28. learned trial judge was of the opinion that by no stretch of imagination, the offences allegedly committed under the above firs can be considered as an offence committed either as a member of an organised crime syndicate or on behalf of such syndicate. 29. i .....

Arti vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... the investigation also revealed the previous involvement of the petitioner herein arti in fir no.267/16, ps kundli, sonepat (haryana) dated 09.08.2016 qua the alleged commission of offence punishable under sections 20/of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985.19. it was contended during the course of the arguments addressed on behalf of the petitioner that apart from the disclosure statement made by the co-accused sanjeev shah, there was nothing that the state had to bring forth ..... hours and also on 08.08.2017 between 19:04:52 to 21:11:46 hours.22. taking into account the totality of the circumstances of the case and the provision of punishment for abetment and criminal conspiracy under section 29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 and the aspect that section 37 of the said enactment makes offences punishable under sections 19, 29, 27a and offences involving commercial quantities to be non-bailable, in as much as a commercial quantity of the .....

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT559

..... no person shall export any of the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or preparation containing any of such narcotic drug or psychotropic substance specified in schedule ii to the countries or to the region of such country specified therein.(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1) above, the narcotics commissioner may authorize export of specified quantities of such narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or preparation containing such narcotic drug or psychotropic substance on the basis of special import licence ..... possession, sale, purchase, transportation, warehousing, concealment, use or consumption, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or transshipment, of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances; (iv) dealing in any activities in narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances other than those provided in sub-clauses (i) to (iii); or(v) handling or letting any premises for the carrying on of any of the activities referred to in .....

Rajinder Gupta Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006CriLJ674; 123(2005)DLT55; 2005(84)DRJ477

..... also would be of no help to the petitioners. the allegation there was of the commission of an offence under section 21 of the ndps act which deals with 'narcotic drugs'. in the present case the petitioners have all been prosecuted for allegedly committing offences under section 22 of the ndps act which relates to 'psychotropic substances'. the definitions for narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances are entirely different. thereforee, the decision in k. r. nagappan (supra) also cannot be pressed in aid of the petitioners' submissions ..... poppy or any cannabis plant; or(c) produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import interstate, export interstate, import into india, export from india or transship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance,except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this act or the rules or orders made there under and in a case where any such provision, imposes any .....

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Sajesh Sharma

Court : Delhi

..... on sanjay kumar kedia and d. ramkrishnan.11. in my view, the contention raised is devoid of any substance. section 8 (c) of the ndps act prohibits manufacture, possession, transport, interstate export and import of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances except for medicinal or scientific purposes, whereas section 24 of the ndps act makes the export or obtaining of any narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in contravention of section 12 of the ndps act to be punishable. thus, anybody dealing with a psychotropic substance for supplying to any person outside india even if it does not find mention in the ndps rules will .....

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Praveen Dua and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... in large scale smuggling of prescription drugs falling under the category of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances to us and other countries. on the basis of the said information, the zonal director, ncb prepared a report and constituted teams from the delhi zonal unit ( dzu ) for searches at the residence/godown premises of dr. bansal at ..... dated 3rd november 2012 passed by the special judge, ndps, patiala house courts, new delhi in sc no.165 of 2008 acquitting the respondents of the offences under sections 21, 22, 23 and 29 of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 ( ndps act ).2. the case of the prosecution was that information had been received from the dea, united states of america that one dr. brij bhushan bansal (respondent no.3 herein), resident of kamla nagar, agra was indulging .....

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Raj Kumar Arora and anr

Court : Delhi

..... court considered the provisions of chapters vi and vii of the ndps rules in the following manner: "...chapter vi of the 1985 rules provides for import, export and transhipment of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. rule 53 contains general prohibition in terms whereof the import and export out of india of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances specified in schedule-i appended thereto is prohibited. such prohibitions, however, is subject to the other provisions of the said chapter. rule 63 to which ..... any cannabis plant; or (c) produce, manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or tranship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this act or the rules or orders made thereunder and in a case where any such provision, imposes any requirement by way of .....

Om Parkash Bakshi Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1989(22)ECC326; 1989RLR143b

..... criminal revision is directed against order of an additional sessions judge by which he had directed for framing of charges against the petitioner and his co-accused for offences punishable u/s 22 & 29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act ('ndps act') read with section 120-b ipc. (2) the facts, in brief, are that asi partap singh accompanied by other constables was stated to be patrolling the area on july 8, 1987. and had reached ..... he fails to account satisfactorily for the possession of any quantity of drug or psychotropic substance etc. so, it is clear that the onus is placed on the accused to explain satisfactorily as to the possession of the drug which is recovered from him. so, mere possession of the drug by itself is an offence under the ndps act. (5) it is not for this court to give any final decision at this stage on the point whether the petitioner was actually in conscious possession of the drug in question. after all the facts as have come out in the challan .....