Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 26 punishment for certain acts by licensee or his servants Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 45 results (0.202 seconds)

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

..... and opium and embezzlement of opium by cultivator have been provided. manufacture of drugs and preparations of psychotropic substances, illegal import into india, export from india or punishment of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, external dealings in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in contravention of section 12 and use of the premises for commission of ..... provisions of section 33 of the act. the punishment for illegal possession in small quantity for personsal consumption of any narcotic drug and psychotropic substances or consumption of such drug or substance is punishable under section 27 which provides the maximum imprisonment for a term of one year or with fine ..... above, in detail and the reasoning which has been given in our view is not the correct appreciation of law. persons dealing with narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances constitute a distinct class than those charged with commission of offence under the penal act. most of the offences under the penal .....

Hakam Singh Vs. Union Territory

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1989(22)ECC315

..... through the documents, the magistrate committed the case for trial before the sessions court. the sessions judge, after framing the charge for an offence under section 18, narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) (shortly the act), to which the appellant pleaded not guilty, examined constable mohan singh (p.w. 1), jaswant singh ..... section 26 provides punishment for certain acts by a licensee or his servant. section 27 provides punishment for illegal possession in small quantity of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substances for personal consumption and discretion has been given to the courts for awarding sentence which may extend to one year or with fine or ..... information given by a person and taken in writing that any person has committed an offence punishable under chap. iv of the act or that any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, in respect of which any offence punishable under chap. iv of the act has been committed, has been kept. in the present case, .....

Shri Vishal Ramesh Khatwani Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with regard to the interim disposal of the property. (10) learned trial magistrates/leaned sessions judges are hereby directed to ensure the disposal of the property in respect of narcotic 33 drugs and psychotropic substances as per the directions of the hon ble supreme court in the case of union of india vs. mohanlal and another, reported in (2016) 3 supreme court cases .....

V. Senthil Balaji Vs. The Deputy Director

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , we may refer to section 45(1)(ii) of pmla, proviso to section 43d(5) of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 and section 37 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short, ndps act ). the provisions regarding bail in some of such statutes start with a non obstante clause for overriding the provisions of sections 437 to 439 of the crpc ..... 2527. under the statutes like pmla, the minimum sentence is three years, and the maximum is seven years. the minimum sentence is higher when the scheduled offence is under the ndps act. when the trial of the complaint under pmla is likely to prolong beyond reasonable limits, the constitutional courts will have to consider exercising their powers to grant bail. the reason .....

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... power to the court to impose fine of more than maximum punishment of rs 2,00,000 as also the presumption of guilt emerging from possession of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, the extent of burden to prove the foundational facts on the prosecution i.e. proof beyond all reasonable doubt would be more onerous. a ..... in fact, there are several legislations which also contain similar provisions relating to the statutory presumption of culpable mental state, such as section 35 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short, the ndps act ), section 138a of the customs act, 1962 (for short, the customs act ), section 278e of the income tax act, 1961 (for short ..... for the sake of argument that all the material seized during an illegal search may be admissible as relevant evidence in other proceedings, the illicit drug or psychotropic substance seized in an illegal search cannot by criminal appeal nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 page 115 of 199 itself be used as proof of .....

Hanumantha Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... 1872) or the criminal procedure code, 1973 (2 of 1974), every court trying an offence under this act, shall treat the inventory, the photographs of [narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyances]. and any list of samples drawn under sub-section (2) and certified by the magistrate, as primary evidence in respect ..... packed, country of origin and other particulars as the officer referred to in sub-section (1) may consider relevant to the identity of the narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyances in any proceedings under this act and make an application, to any magistrate for the purpose of (a) ..... officer and in such manner as that government may, from time to time, determine after following the procedure hereinafter specified. (2) where any narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, controlled substances or conveyances]. has been seized and forwarded to the officer-in-charge of the nearest police station or to the officer empowered .....

Mr R Gopal Reddy Vs. Mr. Mohammed Mukaram

Court : Karnataka

..... question registration of a crime in crime no.329 of 2024 for offences punishable under sections 8(c), 22(b), 22(c), 22(a), 27(b), 25, 27 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 ( the act for short) and sections 290 and 294 of the ipc.2. heard sri prabhuling k.navadgi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and ..... freely distributed in the said premises, police conducted a search, which results in seizure of several narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. the seizure panchanama included drugs like ganja, mdma pills, cocaine, hydro-ganga and other psychotropic substances. the premises was sealed, most of the persons tested positive towards consumption of drugs. the petitioner is roped in as accused no.6. the reason for the petitioner being .....

Prem Prakash Vs. Union Of India Through The Directorate Of Enforcement

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to an economic offence, yet it may not be proper to equate these cases with those punishable with death, imprisonment for life, ten years or more like offences under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, murder, cases of rape, dacoity, kidnaping for ransom, mass violence, etc. neither is this a case where 100/1000s of depositors have been defrauded. the allegations ..... case-to-case basis. we deem it appropriate to extract para 172 of vijay madanlal choudhary (supra). 172. in other words, there is stark distinction between the scheme of the ndps act dealt with by this court in tofan singh (supra) and that in the provisions of the 2002 act under consideration. thus, it must follow that the authorities under the 2002 .....

Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (a) would constitute an offence if committed within india; or (b) under the laws of such place, is an offence relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances having all the legal conditions required to constitute it such an offence the same as or analogous to the legal conditions required to constitute ..... the submissions. under section 8(c), there is a complete prohibition on possessing and transporting any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance. section 22 of the ndps act reads thus: 22. punishment for contravention in relation to psychotropic substances. whoever, in contravention of any provision of this act or any rule or order made ..... accused no.2. along with other co- accused, he was prosecuted for the offences punishable under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short, the ndps act ). the case of the prosecution is that the narcotics control bureau (for short, ncb ) received secret information on 21st december 2013 that a consignment of pentazocine .....

Manish Sisodia Vs. Directorate Of Enforcement

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to an economic offence, yet it may not be proper to equate these cases with those punishable with death, imprisonment for life, ten years or more like offences under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, murder, cases of rape, dacoity, kidnaping for ransom, mass violence, etc. neither is this a case where 100/1000s of depositors have been defrauded. the allegations .....