Skip to content


Multiple - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Sorted by: recent Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 636 results (0.015 seconds)
Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Madhuvana House Building Vs. Asstt Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Bang.)948

..... appeal we would like to adjudicate on the other contentions raised in appeal to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings so far merits of the case are concerned the first submission of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (HC)

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Saroj Devi and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

Reported in: 2002ACJ1146

or say rs 12 000 per annum we feel that multiplier of 15 needs to be applied looking to the age

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2001 (TRI)

Madhuvana House Building Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on: Dec-31-2001

..... appeal we would like to adjudicate on the other contentions raised in appeal to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings 20 so far merits of the case are concerned the first submission .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 28 2001 (HC)

S. Prakash Rao and ors. Vs. S. Shyam Rao

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-28-2001

Reported in: 2002(5)ALT82

..... suits the law commission of india had recommended to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings right to the defendants to raise ..... of relegating the defendant to an independent suit to avert multiplicity of the proceeding and needless protection the legislature intended to ..... plaintiffs the law commission of india had recommended to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings right to the defendants to raise the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 28 2001 (HC)

Deepak Nitrite Ltd. Vs. N.H. Rana

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-28-2001

Reported in: [2002(93)FLR431]

..... covered by the term income under income tax laws this exemption is necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings in taxation laws for the ends of justice under section 38 of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2001 (HC)

Mrs. Kanwaljeet Harbhajan Singh and ors. Vs. Arul Anadan and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-21-2001

Reported in: II(2002)ACC333; 2003ACJ1220

the deceased at rs 2 600 per month applying a multiplier of 12 the lok adalat awarded a compensation of rs

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2001 (HC)

Smt. Sujatha and ors. Vs. H.M. Mallappa Naik and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-21-2001

Reported in: I(2003)ACC56; 2003ACJ791; ILR2002KAR675; 2002(2)KarLJ358

adverse and need not inevitably tend to scale down the multiplicand or the multiplier all contingencies of the future are not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2001 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central), New Delhi Vs. Sitaram ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2001

Reported in: 2002IVAD(Delhi)516; 96(2002)DLT399; [2002]254ITR476(Delhi)

..... view to prevent arbitrariness or unreasonableness on the part of the assessing authority and multiplicity of the assessment proceedings the procedure laid down therein although mandatory but it cannot ..... view to prevent arbitrariness or unreasonableness on the part of the assessing authority and multiplicity of the assessment proceedings the procedure laid down therein although mandatory but it cannot .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2001 (HC)

Aqnelo Alias Robert Fernandes and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-21-2001

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3007

..... cut of 6 cms length in upper front of right forearm with tailing inwards 5 multiple cuts with reddish border in bright cuboital fossa with oozing of serous fluid in an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2001 (TRI)

V. Solomon Jeyapandian and ors. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-21-2001

Reported in: (2002)(102)LC86Tri(Chennai)

..... it strongly we do so and reject both the applications to allow them would encourage multiplicity of hearings and create a wrong precedent 13 for the foregoing reasons we are satisfied .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //