Multiple - Judgment Search Results

The Managing Director, Annai Sathya Transport Corporation Ltd., Dharma ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002ACJ1133; 2000(2)CTC272

a balance and fix the multiplier we consider that the multiplier that has to be adopted and applied in this case

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Muna Khan and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (2000)IIILLJ833Ori; 2000(I)OLR422

..... appears to be for the purpose of proper regulation of cases in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings in the present case in appeal respondent no 1 has filed an affidavit .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ramila and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: I(2000)ACC590; 2002ACJ946

age of the deceased was 35 years therefore we select multiplier of 15 on multiplying it with the multiplicand the amount

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bhagwati Bai and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002ACJ700

days learned counsel submitted that the tribunal has erred in multiplying the income of rs 35 per day with 20 instead

Rai Vimal Krishna and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... of annual rental value of a holding the annual rental value is provided as a multiple of the carpet area and the rental value the rates whereof is also fixed under .....

Khem Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2000CriLJ4326

..... coming out of sockets both lips nostrils were blackened tongue was pushed back there were multiple small laceration on inner side of both lips more on the upper side against central ..... of irregular shape bleeding was present from mouth nostrils and ears gums were also showing multiple small laceration on both jaws two abrasions with underlying bruise brown in colour were present .....

Kanoria Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR2368; [2000]119STC117(Kar)

1 56 000 towards loss of dependency by taking the multiplier of 7 held claimant being a married daughter of deceased

Dilip Deshlehra Vs. Varsha Gyanwani and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002ACJ473

filed a cross objection and his submission is that the multiplier of 16 as applied by the claims tribunal is not

Sangeeta and ors. Vs. Sanjay Kumar and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002ACJ773

regarding the multiplier according to the age of the deceased multiplier of 17 ought to have been applied by the tribunal

S. Jayakumar and anr. Vs. Tamil Chelvi and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002ACJ288; (2000)IIMLJ382

worked out the compensation improperly and had used the wrong multiplier in arriving at the compensation the tribunal used the multiplier