Multiple Listing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple listing Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 43 results (0.074 seconds)Photophone Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-1983
Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT168TriDel
..... or electrical and designed for room listening whether having single or multiple input channels 7 we are however of the view that in ..... the imported goods cannot be used in gramophones record players etc listed under sub item ii of item 37a it may by pointed ..... not parts and accessories of gramophones record players record changers etc listed under sub item ii of item 37a the exception viii amp .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMorrison-knudsen Vs. Director, Owcp
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-24-1983
..... accompanying the 1972 amendments which raised the maximum benefit from a specific sum to a multiple of the national average weekly wage stated today the average weekly wage for private non ..... see united states bureau of labor statistics handbook of labor statistics 1978 p 321 1979 listing data from 1972 the bureau determines earnings by dividing payrolls by hours the earnings do .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanga Watch Company Vs. N.V. Philliphs, Eindhoven, Holland and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-03-1983
Reported in: AIR1983P& H418
automatic and line telephony apparatus and equipment dark room timers multiple electric clocks and timers 3 the defendants a partnership firm
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShree Siddheshwar Sahakari Sankar Karkhana Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-15-1983
Reported in: AIR1984Bom81; ILR1984Bom1784; 1983MhLJ719
..... differently indian evidence act 1872 section 24 v s sirpurkar deepak verma jj dying declaration multiple murders by accused dying declaration not implicating one accused evidence of eye witnesses however completely ..... under section 73a of the maharashtra co operative societies act 1960 to add to the list of designated officers is not arbitrary or uncontrolled the legislature has clearly indicated the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishan Jadav and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-04-1983
Reported in: 1984CriLJ1466
..... a constable as well as p w 2 on examination he found multiple injuries lacerated incised punctured incised penetrating and incised wound abrasion ecchymosis ..... deceased being produced by his wife p w 3 under a seizure list in the presence of the witnesses after obtaining the post mortem ..... seized by him in the presence of witnesses under a seizure list the carbon copy of which was marked as ext 4 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVasantkumar Radhakisan Vora and ors. Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-1983
Reported in: AIR1984Bom96; 1984(2)BomCR478; ILR1984Bom1784a
..... view these provisions of the rent act an in order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings by reason of the same contention being raised over again ..... of suit is provided in respect ascertain causes of action and a list of matter is included in s 19 in respect of which the ..... the object of enacting s 42 a was to prevent abuse and multiplicity of proceedings in the absence of such of a provision giving .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExcise Commissioner Uttar Pradesh Allahabad and ors. Vs. Prem Jeet Sin ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-10-1983
Reported in: AIR1983SC1056; 1983(2)SCALE71; (1984)1SCC270
..... doubtful solvency no person whose name appears upon the district or state defaulter s list should be allowed to bid 12 when after due weight has been given to ..... a rule bids should not be taken in amounts smaller then multiples of rs 5 up to rs 100 in multiples of rs 10 from rs 100 to 300 in ..... 25 from rs 300 to rs 500 in multiples of rs 50 from rs 500 to rs 1 000 and in multiples of rs 100 from rs 1 000 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarcher Vs. Daggett
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-22-1983
data are concrete and reasonably reliable and because judges can multiply and divide even as a basis for protecting voters in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTStraw Products Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-17-1983
Reported in: [1983]6ITD35(Cal)
company were less or in excess of 10 shares or multiple of 10 shares the new equity shares and new preference
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatel Maganbhai Bapujibhai and ors. Vs. Patel Ishwarbhai Motibhai and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-20-1983
Reported in: 1985ACJ867; AIR1984Guj69
are equally responsible it is not necessary for us to multiply authorities on the point save and except referring to one 37 7 we have already mentioned earlier that with the list ex 37 at item 7 was produced by the plaintiff
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial