Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Court: orissa Page 2 of about 11 results (1.168 seconds)

Union of India Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... from the plaintiff-sail. the plaintiff had neither choice of route no.any opportunity to it to kno.the actual route of transport which was within the special knowledge of the railway authorities. the booking and dispatch in question were during the period from 15.04.1986 to ..... charges were levied with freight on rationalized route basis instead of shortest and cheapest route, they objected to the same and stated that when the goods were to be dispatched through the shortest and cheapest route, there was no justification for carrying the same otherwise and saddle if with freight for ..... the forwarding note, though it was noted forwarding station and destination station as visakhpatnam and rourkela respectively, it had no.been indicated the route though which goods would be delivered, though the railways authorities issued receipts showing visakhpatnam being the booking station, bandamunda via kharagpur being designation. accordingly charges calculated and collected .....