Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: multimodal transportation of goods act 1993 chapter 1 preliminary Court: karnataka Page 26 of about 293 results (0.183 seconds)

Byrareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Smt Bhagyamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Ratheesh Nambiar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Smt Meena Poojarthi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Mr G Pulla Reddy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

Sri. Munithirumallalppa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... muni raju r/a no.32, eshwar temple road ramohalli, kengeri hobli bangalore south taluk bangalore - 560 074. 3 . sri. m.k. ayyappa commissioner, transport department, transport building, shanti nagar bangalore 560027. 4 . jagadeesh thahasildhar bangalore south taluk aged about45years bangalore 560 009. 10 5 . shivanna rtd. deputy thahsildar aged about61years bangalore ..... that cannot be lightly interfered with. the unconstitutionality must be plainly and clearly established before an enactment is declared as void. the same approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending ..... evaluating the evidence. primafacie opinion formed by the special court for taking cognizance of the offence cannot be found fault with. we do not find any good ground to entertain the petition and hence, writ petition stands dismissed. re: w.p.no.1348/2018 164. on a complaint filed by second respondent .....

M/s Express Publications (madurai) Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... and could not be said to be dismissed, discharged or retrenched within the industrial disputes act?. the tribunal also held that the agreements were simple agreements for transport of goods and were essentially fair to the operators. of course, there were advantages as well as disadvantages but the employees not being servants were free agents and ..... running the vehicle. under this agreement the operator was at liberty to canvass for goods and transport them but he was required to give the utmost priority to the goods entrusted to the company for transport. in this way the goods booked with the company were transported by the operators in priority and they paid re. 1.00 per mile ..... contracts were entered into after the present reference was made to the tribunal.7. there is no doubt that the company is a motor transport undertaking because it is engaged in carrying goods by road for hire or reward. since the drivers have resigned their jobs they cannot be said to be employed in the motor .....

Sri.n.p.amrutesh Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... either of them for filing these writ petitions at this juncture. it is pertinent to note that only considering the plight of the litigant public, escalation in transport and other incidental charges, the committee has recommended the constitution of a bench at madurai. according to the learned additional advocate general, the structural work for the ..... ) 2 kb215(ca)]., scrutton, l.j.put the matter thus: the doctrine that, because a certain number of people do not like an act and because a good many people disobey it, the act is therefore obsolescent and no one need pay any attention to it, is a very dangerous proposition to hold in any constitutional country ..... than one seat for transaction of judicial business. the constitution and structure of the high court depends on the statute creating it. the decision in nasiruddin v. state transport appellate tribunal [(1975) 2 scc671: air1976sc331: (1976) 1 scr505 is not directly in point as it turned on the construction of the provisions of the u.p .....

Appropriate Authority Vs. Mass Traders Private Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1993)111CTR(Kar)294; ILR1993KAR1018

..... and regulation authorities for the proposed transfer. there are three tenants in the property at the moment. they are m/s. phoenix ice factory, m/s. mahalaxmi agencies and mahalaxmi transports. while both smt. aimai n. irani and sri darius n. irani are partners in m/s. phoenix ice factory, the former is a partner in m/s. mahalaxmi agencies as ..... same will have to be borne in mind. in ourview, the said observation would only mean that the ratio laid down bythe supreme court in the earlier paras would hold good to thosecases which were concluded once for all. there might be cases whichwere decided and concluded earlier. however, the aggrieved personain those cases cannot be allowed to re-open those .....

Nagappa Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1994Kant77; ILR1993KAR3323; 1993(4)KarLJ290

..... it is not in dispute that by the provisions of this act all the existing contracts between parties and the state and existing grants in respect of collection, transport, storage and otherwise dealing with resin have come to forthwith terminate and a monopoly situation has been created qua these operations in resin in favour of the government ..... overwhelming' must appear before the court will intervene. that is, and ought to be, a difficult onus for an applicant to discharge. the courts are not very good at formulating or evaluating policy. sometimes when the courts have intervened on.policy grounds, the court's view of the range of policies open under the statute or of ..... exercising that function; and all powers possessed by a public authority, however, conferred, or possessed 'solely in order that it may use them for the public good'. the only exception limiting the same is to be found in specific cases where such exclusion may be desirable for strong reasons of public policy.' at paras 28 .....