Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2003(3)KLT981; (2004)IILLJ277Ker
R. Rajendra Babu, J. 1. Petitioners who were employed in the Canteen established by The Cochin Port Trust filed this petition for directing the respondents, the Cochin Port Trust to grant all benefits to the petitioners as regular staff of the Port Trust including Scale of Pay and other service benefits and for quashing Ext. P7 issued by the Port Trust on 24.3.2000 and also for other reliefs.2. It was alleged that the petitioners were the employees of the respondent-Cochin Port Trust and were working in the Canteen from 8 to 13 years continuously, that the above canteen was providing services to the workers under the Cochin Port Trust and was a statutory canteen established under Section 46 of the Factories Act. However, for the convenience, the Cochin Port Trust had entrusted the running of the Canteen with Contractors for some time and the contractors were running canteen with the employees permanently engaged by the Port Trust, with the facilities made available by the Port Trust in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2005(1)KLT757
V. Ramkumar, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 2/2004 on the file of the Addl. District Court, Kozhikode are the appellants in this appeal filed under 0rder 43 Rule 1(r) of C.P.C.2. The aforementioned suit filed by the respondent herein is one for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their men from using the words 'Sagar Inn' and particularly using the name 'Sagar' denoting the name of the concern shown as the second defendant and also from using the word ' Sagar' written in the same mode and style as has been done by the plaintiff from 1978 onwards in its sign boards, hoardings, bills, visiting cards and advertisement etc. or using such other name or service as is deceptively similar to 'Hotel Sagar' of the plaintiff for denoting the 2nd defendant or any hotel or restaurant or any other concern of the first defendant.3. As per I.A. No. 1178/2004 the respondent/plaintiff also prayed for a temporary injunction in terms of the aforesaid prayer in the plaint. The Court belo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
1. The issue in these writ petitions concerns the legality of an appointment made by the President of a Society. The appointment is said to have been ratified subsequently by the managing committee. Acting on the complaints of certain persons, the Assistant Registrar interdicted the appointment; the Society implemented his directive. But the employee was not heard before her termination. Thus, the Court is called upon to decide on the propriety of the procedure adopted by the Assistant Registrar and the Society in removing the employee. 2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 38458 of 2015 challenges Exts.P2 and P3, the order of the Assistant Registrar and the resolution of the society respectively, through which the petitioner s appointment was sought to be cancelled. 3. In W.P. (C) No.2028 of 2016, the petitioner, who is said to be a rival candidate for the post, raises an issue concerning the competence of the President to appoint the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 38458 of 2015. The appointmen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Ramachandran Nair, J. 1. This Writ Appeal is filed against judgment of the learned Single Judge holding that a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter called "the KCS Act") answers the definition of "public authority" as defined under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter called "the RTI Act") and hence the Registrar of Co-operative Societies was within his powers in issuing the order impugned in the Writ Petition directing all societies to constitute authorities under the RTI Act for furnishing information sought about societies. When the Writ Appeal filed by the appellant- society against the judgment of the learned Single Judge came up before the Division Bench of two of us(CNR and BPR (JJ)), we were referred to another Division Bench decision of this court in THALAPPALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS reported in 2009(3) KHC 901 wherein that Bench took the view that a society wo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE16H DAY OF JULY201525TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31264 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. PAUL CHACKO, ASSISTANT MANAGER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, KANNUR.2. S.REMESAN, ASSISTANT MANAGER KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, PATHANAMTHITTA.3. KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK EMPLOYEES' UNION (BEFI) REG.NO.327/77, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK BUILDING, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001. BY ADV. SRI.P.N.MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK BUILDING, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY,THE27H DAY OF FEBRUARY20158TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 23400 of 2014 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: -------------------------- 1. PRADEEP U.R., (MEMBER NO. 9108), PRESIDENT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DESAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO. 134, DESAMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR.2. V.GANGADHARAN (MEMBER NO. 1593), MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DESAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO. 134, DESAMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENTS: --------------------------- 1. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), THRISSUR.3. THE ELECTORAL OFFICER APPOINTED FOR CONDUCT OF ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DESAMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO. 134, DESAMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), THALAPPILLY, THRISSUR) 4...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2013 9TH SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 18989 of 2013 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS: --------------- 1. GEORGE MATHEW MEMBER NO. 5082 UDAYAGIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. I, 141 PRAKASH P.O., KATTAPANA, IDUKKI RESIDING AT THORTTIYIL, PERUMTHOTTY P.O., IDUKKI.2. SOMAN CHINNATHAMPI MEMBER NO. 3221 UDAYAGIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. I, 141 PRAKASH P.O., KATTAPANA, IDUKKI RESIDING AT CHETTIMATTAM HOUSE, MARYGIRI P.O., IDUKKI.3. A.P.CHANDRAN MEMBER NO. 4642 UDAYAGIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. I, 141 PRAKASH P.O., KATTAPANA, IDUKKI RESIDING AT AMAROTH HOUSE, MARYGIRI P.O., IDUKKI.4. THOMAS OUSEPH MEMBER NO. 5274 UDAYAGIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. I, 141 PRAKASH P.O., KATTAPANA, IDUKKI RESIDING AT MALIYEKKAL HOUSE, MARYGIRI P.O., IDUKKI.5. VIJAYAN SREEDHARAN MEMBER NO. 5256 UDAYAGIRI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. I, 141 PRAKA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. SHAFFIQUE MONDAY,THE 15TH DAY OF JULY2013/24TH ASHADHA, 1935 WP(C). No. 9919 of 2012 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------ A.V. RAVEENDRAN NAIR, AGED 6 YEARS SANNIDHANAM, THANNEERMUKKOM P.O., CHERTHALA ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI. P.N. MOHANAN RESPONDENTS: ---------------------- 1. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001.2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.3. THE KAINADY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.3814, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 001.4. PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL AGRICULTURAL OFFICE ALAPPUZHA-688 001. BY ADV. SRI. P.C. SASIDHARAN BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-07-2013 ALONG WITH WP(C) NO. 25475 OF 2012.THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C). No. 9919 of 2012 (L) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 22ND SRAVANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19912 of 2012 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- GIREESH KUMAR, M. NO. 3436, EX-PRESIDENT, ANKAMALY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO. 714, RESIDING AT KIZHAKKE MOOTHATT HOUSE (GIRI BHAVAN) H. NO. 135, NAYATHODE, ANKAMALY. BY ADVS.SRI.P.P.JACOB SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 016. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (G), ALUVA, PIN 101. 3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARYTO GOVERNMENT, CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 001. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ROSE MICHAEL BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2013, ALONG WITH WPC. NO.20217/2012 AND CONNECTED CASES,THE CO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Mrs. A. Radha : Member Aggrieved by the Order passed in C.C.No.85/2010 on the file of CDRF, Kollam, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant availed a Cash Credit Loan from the 1st opposite party for an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- under Loan No.CC.98 mortgaging his property by himself and his son. The rate of interest was @ 16% at the time of passing the loan and thereafter the interest was reduced in view of the order of the Reserve Bank of India. The complainant remitted the loan amount in February, 2000 by remitting Rs.35,000/- till November, 2009. The balance amount as on 12/08/2009 was Rs.29,863/-. Thereafter the complainant remitted Rs.29,000/- on 12/11/2009. The complainant submitted an application for return of the documents to the 2nd respondent on 31/03/2010 against which an amount of Rs.1000/- was remitted. It is stated in the complaint that the complainant altogether remitted Rs.16,01,300/- against the loan of Rs.7 Lakh...
Tag this Judgment!