Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2001 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results

Guruanna Vadi and Another Vs. the General Manager, Karnataka State Roa ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2001ACJ1528; AIR2001Kant275; ILR2001KAR2879; 2001(5)KarLJ322

several other provisions in chapters xi and xii of the motor vehicles act enforcement of section 163 a is dependant on long drawn procedure for the first time under the motor vehicles act a structured formula determining the compensation to be paid the parliament the statement of objects and reasons supporting the amendment act 54 of 1994 are set out in the act compensation on proof of fault basis to the extent of actual liability incurred which alternately means an unlimited liability in accident and others the question of interpretation and the scope of section 96 arose sarkar j speaking for the court made it referred to as the amending act the division bench on 3rd of march 2000 after formulating certain questions of law which

Latabai Bhagwan Kakade and ors. Vs. Mohammed Ismail Mohd. Saab Bagwan ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: I(2002)ACC407; II(2002)ACC742; 2002ACJ407

..... 2 the motor vehicles act 1988 as amended by motor vehicles amendment act 1994 came into force on 14 11 1994 section 163 a of the amended act provides for ..... or where the owners of the vehicle reside by section 53 of the amending act sub section 3 of section 166 has been omitted and ..... in oriental insurance co ltd v hansrajbhai v kodala 2001 2scr999 the supreme court has again taken into consideration .....

Guruanna Vedi and anr. Vs. General Manager, Karnataka State Road Trans ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: III(2002)ACC350

it dashed against hospital bangalore bus and then struck the motor cycle and the shuttle bus resulting in the accident praveen questions are 1 whether section 163 a of the motor vehicles act 1988 for short the act confers substantial or procedural the parliament the statements of objects and reasons supporting the amendment act 54 1994 are set out in the act the facie liability subject to the defences available under motor vehicles act 1988 after such confirmations of prima facie liability by the a claim petition for compensation is to be found in section 163b which states where a person is entitled to claim the vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person 3 the central government may keeping in view the cost of

A. Chandra Sekhar Reddy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(1)ALD28; 2001(6)ALT503

s b sinha c j 1 the vires of section 52 of the motor vehicles act 1988 as amended by the motor vehicles amendment act 2000 is in question in these petitions 2 the petitioners herein intend to covert their ..... 2001 has held that although such substitution of a petrol engine by a diesel engine is not permissibleunder the main provision it is so in terms of the proviso appended thereto 3 .....

M.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State Transport Appellate Tr ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(2001)ACC168; AIR2001MP209; 2001(3)MPHT349

of the supreme court in mithilesh garg supra and janta motor transport reported in 1984 suppl scc 711 are read together then invited attention to the objects and reasons for motor vehicles amendment act 1994 act no 54 of 1994 hereinafter referred basis of age income which is more liberaland rational in amendment of section 68 it is mentioned that in section 68 ground that after insertion of section 68 3 ca of act only state government is empowered to formulate of new rout has no bearing with the creation of the routes under section 67 state government can issue directions only with respect to in section 68 of the principal act in sub section 3 after clause c clause c a shall be inserted 8

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Etc. Vs. Hansrajbhai V.Kodala and ors. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(2001)ACC618; 2001ACJ827; AIR2001SC1832; 2001(3)ALT34(SC); [2001]105CompCas743(SC); (2001)3GLR2156; JT2001(4)SC477; 2001(2)KLT235(SC); (2001)2MLJ180(SC); RLW2001(2)SC231;

instrument having the force of law the owner of the motor vehicle of the authorised insurer shall be liable to pay 11 thereafter a committee to review the provisions of motor vehicles act 1988 and central motor vehicle rules 1989 hereinafter referred the provision in chapter viia inserted by the motor vehicles amendment act 1982 enables the victim or the dependants of the the motor vehicles act 1988 hereinafter referred to as the act as per the structured formula basis is in addition or payment of compensation by the owner of the vehicle while section 163a after reading of as or would mean that owner compensation paid where the compensation is paid under section 163a 3 the words under any other law for the time being

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Muna Maya Basant W/O Sher Bahadur Bas ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: II(2001)ACC589; 2001ACJ940; AIR2001Guj304; (2001)1GLR915

the victim therefore prefers to claim the compensation under the motor vehicles act he will be debarred from claiming the compensation will be debarred from claiming the compensation under the motor vehicles act in the case on hand when the respondent no vehicles act of 1939 was then amended vide motor vehicles amendment act 1982 incorporating sees 92 a to 92 e so act of 1939 was then amended vide motor vehicles amendment act 1982 incorporating sees 92 a to 92 e so as earning the premium the parliament has in its wisdom enacted section 167 which lays down that if the claimant has a appeal no 7288 of 1999 4 karsanbhai vaghabhai aged about 30 years was serving as driver he was earning rs 42

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Km. Vibha Devi and Others

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001ACJ1009; 2001(1)AWC598

raised such objections as permissible under section 149 of the motor vehicles act 1988 section 149 does not permit the insurance such objections as permissible under section 149 of the motor vehicles act 1988 section 149 does not permit the insurance company has been omitted by section 53 of the motor vehicles amendment act 1994 which came into force w e f 14 motor vehicles act 1939 was repealed and the motor vehicles act 1988 came into force w e f 1 7 1989 amending act it does not appear that the said sub section 3 has been deleted retrospectively but at the same time the claimant respondents motor vehicles accident claim petition section 110a 3 of motor vehicles act 1939 since repealed sections 166 3

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Kumar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... 2001 1 pljr 431 of course section 170 of motor vehicles act has placed certain restrictions upon the insurer of the motor vehicle ..... the notional income fixed by the motor vehicles amendment act 1994 which is for unemployed ..... 3 of the claim case no 14 of 1993 2 the relevant fact was that the claimants of the aforesaid claim case had preferred an application under section 166 of the motor vehicles act .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Matiur Rahman and ors.

Court: Patna

his car with a truck but the question is whether motor vehicles act 1988 shall decide the principles on the basis law to be adopted for fixing the compensation amount motor vehicles act 1988 has not laid down any specific principle on expenditure incurred on his treatment however second schedule to the amendment act 1994 has given a chart on the basis of which the compensation amount would be fixed or whether amendment act 1994 would be applicable for the principles to be adopted act 1994 are to be followed for fixing compensation amount 3 i find that in the instant case two kinds of