Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motor transport workers act 1961 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 2 of about 141 results (0.059 seconds)

Sep 03 2015 (HC)

1. P.Paramasivan Vs. 1. the Management of Madurai Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

..... be a factory under sub-section (2) of section 85 of that act; or (b) a plantation as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the plantations labour act, 1951 (central act lxix of 1951); or (c) a motor transport undertaking as defined in clause (g) of section 2 of the motor transport workers act, 1961 (central act 27 of 1961); or (d) a beedi industrial premises as defined ..... in clause (i) of section 2 of the beedi and cigar workers (conditions of employment) act, 1966 (central act 32 of 1966); or (e) an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2014 (HC)

M/S.Dhaya College of Engineering Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

..... namely, (i) non-availability of 175 books, (ii) cafeteria to be shifted from inside the building to outside the premises; and (iii) to provide transport facilities to the students. all the three defects were appropriately rectified forthwith and the same was communicated to the third respondent on 25.07.2011. even thereafter ..... the college was emphasised, which reads thus, ".59. the above enunciated principles clearly show that the council is the authority constituted under the central act with the responsibility of maintaining education of standards and judging upon the infra-structure and facilities available for imparting such professional education. its opinion is ..... recognition, permission and affiliation of teacher training course. in paragraph 52 to 54 it is held thus, ".52. under the scheme of the ncte act, there are three principal bodies involved in processing the applications for grant or refusal of recognition for running of teacher training courses by various institutions. they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2013 (HC)

A-2459 the Coats Viyella Employees Vs. 1. Harvey Nagar Residents

Court : Chennai

..... {2005 (6) scc725 (b). u.p. state bridge corporation ltd and otehrs vs. u.p.rajya setu nigam karamchari sangh {2004 (4) scc268 (c). rajasthan state road transport corpn vs. krishna kant {(1995) 5 scc75 (d). chandrakant tukaram nikam vs. municipal corpn of ahamed {(2002) 2 scc542 (e). seth chan ratan vs. pandit durga prasad ..... formed with the object of undertaking, welfare measure for the benefit of the residents of harvey nagar. the sixth respondent/madura coats private ltd company and their workers formed a society called madura mills employees co-operative building society. based on the request made by the said registered society, (bearing registration no.2459), ..... of 2013:- the appellant/association was formed for the welfare of their members and it was registered under the societies registration act bearing no.23/87 till date, the association was functioning smoothly. the workers of madura coats (sixth respondent in w.a.(md) no.891 of 2013) formed an association called madura mills .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2013 (HC)

Madras Race Club Vs. M.Victor

Court : Chennai

..... sought in the suit cannot be granted by this court; (iii) in view, at least of, the doctrine of election, since the workers have already invoked the machinery provided under the industrial disputes act, 1947; and (iv) in view of improper valuation and non payment of proper court fee as prescribed by the tamilnadu court fees and ..... benefits. the suits were decreed by the trial court. the first and second appeals were dismissed by the district court and the high court respectively, forcing the transport corporation to go before the supreme court.15. when those appeals filed by rajasthan srtc came up before a two member bench of the supreme court, the ..... (supra), which is a constitution bench judgment, is binding on us. we may also observe that the application of doctrine of prospective overruling in rajasthan state road transport corporation and another vs. krishna kant and others (supra) may not be correct because either a court has the requisite jurisdiction or it does not have. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2013 (HC)

T.M.Prakash Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

..... 1990, has been sent in this regard and followed by reminders. a copy of the said proceedings has been marked to the 1st petitioner, general secretary, laundry worker's welfare committee, 37, polur road, tiruvannamalai, the revenue inspector, tiruvannamalai (north) and land surveyor, tiruvannmalai.48. as stated supra, the jamabanthi officer cum ..... of the legislature by carefully attending to the whole scope of the statute.26. the hon'ble mr. justice hidayatullah, in m/s.sainik motors v. state of rajasthan reported in air1961sc1480 observed that ordinarily though the word shall is mandatory, it can be interpreted as directory if the context ..... . in england the statutory instruments (confirmatory powers) order, 1947 contemplates orders in council or other instruments which are described as orders. the rules publication act 1893 in england defines ".rule making authority". to include every authority authorised to make any statutory rules. statutory rules are defined there as rules, regulations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2013 (HC)

K.S.Abdul Rashid Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

..... similar contingencies, of course, dealing with petitions for stay in j.venkataraman and anr. v. the government of tamil nadu rep., by its commissioner and secretary, home (transport) department, madras-9 and anr., w.m.p. nos. 18178 and 18179 of 1987 in w.p. nos. 12349 and 12340 of 1987. order dated 13 ..... trial and if such suspension is necessary in the public interest. in the said judgment, the decisions of the supreme court in hotel imperial v. hotel workers' union reported in air1959sc1342:1959. ii llj544and in r.p.kapur v. union of india reported in air1964sc787:1966. ii llj164were followed and upheld the similar ..... , madurai-2. 14.thiru kalarani, assistant chemical examiner, deputy director, tamil nadu forensic sciences laboratory, chennai. 15.thiru thirumurugan, head clerk, special court under p.c. act cases, madurai. 16.thiru krishnamoorthy, sub-divisional engineer (vigilance), o/o.the general manager, bsnl, madurai. 17.thiru raveendiran, hc787 vigilance and anti-corruption, madurai. 18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2013 (HC)

A.Arunagiri Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.

Court : Chennai

..... without intervention of court by any process other than conferment of the power in the registered mortgage deed as per section 69 of the transfer of property act ? (14) whether such an unregistered loan agreement containing clauses usually found in a simple registered mortgage deed, namely payment schedule, acceleration clause, penal ..... , all allegations made by the plaintiff that goondas were present and that genuine bidders were prevented from participating and that the directors of the mortgagee acted in collusion with the highest bidder, become hearsay evidence and not direct evidence. p.w.1 himself admitted in cross-examination (towards the closing portion ..... society was entitled to redeem the property, since the conveyance was not complete. that decision was challenged before the appellate court under the cooperative societies act. during the pendency of the appeal, the society got their original plaint amended to include a prayer for redemption. the appellate court held that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2013 (HC)

D.Ravikumar Vs. Ti Diamond ChaIn Ltd

Court : Chennai

..... chains had been shifted from mth road, ambattur, to b-6, ambattur industrial estate, chennai, for the manufacturing of cycle chains, exclusively. when the workers of the ambattur industrial estate resorted to strike, demanding enhanced basic salary and dearness allowance, a settlement had been arrived at between the management and the ..... obliterated the distinction between the two jurisdictions. while exercising jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari the high court may annul or set aside the act, order or proceedings of the subordinate courts but cannot substitute its own decision in place thereof. in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction the high court may ..... the well established principles of law. even if the closure of the first respondent is contrary to the provisions of section 25-o of the industrial disputes act, 1947, the appellants could have been paid the appropriate compensation. however, the directions issued by the labour court for their reinstatement in service, with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2013 (HC)

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

..... . 11.2. part vii of the companies act, comprising of five chapters, the first relating to the modes of winding up and contributories, the second relating to ..... 098. 2.industrial development bank of india ltd., represented by its chairman and managing director, idbi towers, cuffee parade, mumbai. 3.salem textiles, national textile workers union, registration no.253/slm, affiliated to intuc, selliampalayam, narasinghapuram (po), salem district. 4.salem mavatta dravida panchalai thozhilalar munnetra sangam, affiliated to lpf ..... act incorporated certain provisions for the winding up and dissolution of companies. the provisions relating to winding up, were intended broadly to balance the rights of the company and the shareholders on the one hand vis-a-vis the secured and unsecured creditors on the other hand. there was no attempt initially to take care of the interest of the workers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2013 (HC)

Management Needle Industries Ltd Vs. the Presiding Officer

Court : Chennai

..... the said contention, the learned counsel placed reliance on the law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in international airport authority of india v. international air cargo workers' union, [(2009) 13 scc 374.and ram singh v. union territory, chandigarh, [(2004) 1scc 126].19. mr.v.prakash, the learned senior counsel for ..... the various units run by it. the management has formed several units in different names and under such garb has denied the statutory benefits to its female workers numbering 600. the names of such units owned by the management have been stated to be as follows:- 1.evergreen enterprises 2.universal enterprises 3.grindwell ..... supra. the said decision, arose out of a proceedings under the contract labour (regulation & abolition) act, 1970, wherein a writ petition was filed before the high court by the workmen, who were engaged in the work of lifting, transporting, etc., were contract labourers and the work carried out by them was perennial and the labour contract .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //