Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motor transport workers act 1961 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 141 results (0.112 seconds)

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Krishnan A., Lineman Grade I

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC116; (1998)IIILLJ72Mad; (1997)IIMLJ79

..... as claimed is based upon only the terms and conditions contained in the settlement entered into under section 18(1) of the industrial disputes act by the management and the workers union and not under any general or common law as such. merely because the plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration that a ..... disputes involving the enforcement of the rights and liabilities created by the certified standing orders. those were cases wherein the employees of the rajasthan state road transport corporation were terminated from service on the basis of proved charges in disciplinary enquiries and the aggrieved employees filed suits for declaration that the order terminating ..... practice or habitually or by common consent without even being incorporated in the contract and consequently it would be an industrial dispute.14. in the rajasthan road transport corporation and anr. etc., etc v. krishna kant etc., : (1995)iillj728sc the apex court was concerned with the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters .....

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Represented by Its Superintending Engine ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)2MLJ79

..... as claimed is based upon only the terms and conditions contained in the settlement entered into under section 18(1) of the industrial disputes act by the management and the workers union and not under any general or common law as such. merely because the plaintiff was filed a suit for declaration that a ..... disputes involving the enforcement of the fights and liabilities created by the certified standing orders. those were cases wherein the employees of the rajasthan state road transport corporation were terminated from service on the basis of proved charges in disciplinary enquiries and the aggrieved employees filed suits for declaration that the order terminating ..... in practice or habitually or by common consent without even being incorporated in the contract and consequently it would be an industrial dispute.17. in the rajasthan road transport corporation and anr. etc., etc. v. krishna kant etc. : (1995)iillj728sc the apex court was concerned with the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters .....

P.H.C.M. Gandhi, President Rica Employees Union (AITUC) Vellore Vs. Th ...

Court : Chennai

..... sebastian v. the regional manager, india tourism development corporation, madras reported in 1996 (ii) mlj 283, a learned single judge of this court, after considering sarguja transport service's case (cited supra) and other decisions, held that the writ petition filed, challenging the very same impugned order, without disclosing the earlier writ petition, ..... not open to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition for the same prayer. reference can be made to the few decisions, (i) in sarguja transport service v. state trasport appellate tribunal, gwalior reported in air 1987 sc 88, the hon'ble supreme court, while considering the point, as to whether ..... etc, apca is purely a government organisation. in government organizations, such as tamil nadu state marketing corporation (tasmac), tamil nadu state transport corporation tansi, etc., e.p.f.and m.p. act, 1952 are made applicable. after 01.04.2003, in all the government departments, applicability of general provident fund scheme has been .....

P. Murugan Vs. The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

..... have had consequences that members of the court before whom the matter comes consider to be injurious to the public interest. 19. in d.r. venkatachalam v. dy. transport commr. [1977 (2) scc 273] it was observed that courts must avoid the danger of a priori determination of the meaning of a provision based on their ..... (4) unless all of them agree for such a course. there are five unnumbered provisos to section 13(9) which deal with pari passu charge of the workers of a company in liquidation. the first of these provisos lays down that in the case of a company in liquidation, the amount realised from the sale of ..... has considered all the three applications and passed a common order, dated 13th february, 2015, holding that the respondent bank has initiated proceedings to recover public money, under sarfaesi act, 2002, which is not vitiated. 40. aggrieved by the same, the petitioners therein preferred three appeals before the debt recovery appellate tribunal, chennai. office has raised an .....

Larsen and Toubro Employees Union, Rep. by its Secretary, R. Ramu Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

..... that too against the private employer. 4. the supreme court in issue concerning labour legislation, held that remedy provided under the industrial disputes act has to be availed before coming to this court vide judgment in transport and dock workers union v. mumbai port trust reported in (2011) 2 scc 575 and in paragraph 14 had observed as follows: "14. in our opinion ..... been effected pending conciliation, there is infraction of section 33 (2) of the industrial disputes act and in such circumstances, writ petition has been filed. however, after going through the conciliation notice and taking note of a decision of the hon'ble apex court in transport and dock workers union v. mumbai port trust reported in(2011) 2 scc 575, at paragraph nos .....

N. Gowthaman @ Babu Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by i ...

Court : Chennai

..... ) of section 53-a of the indian penal code, extracted above, provides the complete answer for the meaning of the term transportation in section 10-a of the borstal schools act. the word transportation in the borstal schools act simply means imprisonment for life . 75. in kishori lal vs. emperor, [air (32) 1945 pc 64], the board had ..... as if he had been originally sentenced to detention in a borstal school. 10-a power of state government to transfer offenders sentenced to transportation to borstal schools: . . . . .the provisions of this act shall apply to such offender as if he had been originally sentenced to detention in a borstal school. 84. following vallabhapuram ravi's ..... when the age was changed, because, the legislature did not want to empower the court under section 8 of the borstal schools act to send an adolescent offender liable to be sentenced for transportation to the borstal school. the legislature wanted that power to be given only to the government and that is why section 10- .....

M/s. Falcon Types Ltd., Rep., by its Authorised Signatory, Chander Kot ...

Court : Chennai

..... provisions of the act. it is worthwhile to extract the reported judgments considered in indian coffee worker's co-op. society ltd.,'s case (cited supra), which are reproduced hereunder: in mohd. ashfaq v. state transport appellate tribunal, u.p., [air 1976 sc 2161], the supreme court was considering section 58 of the motor vehicles act. the supreme ..... court has ruled as under:- "section 58 of the said act provided that ..... there was sufficient cause for not making it in time. now, the question which arises is : does section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 apply so as to empower the regional transport authority, for sufficient cause to entertain an application for renewal even where it is delayed by more than 15 days? section 29, sub .....

R. Gowrishankar Vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals)-I, Chenn ...

Court : Chennai

..... the provisions of the act. it is worthwhile to extract the reported judgments considered in indian coffee worker's co-op. society ltd.,'s case (cited supra), as follows: in mohd. ashfaq v. state transport appellate tribunal, u.p., [air 1976 sc 2161], the supreme court was considering section 58 of the motor vehicles act. the supreme court has ..... ruled as under:- "section 58 of the said act provided that a permit ..... that there was sufficient cause for not making it in time. now, the question which arises is : does section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 apply so as to empower the regional transport authority, for sufficient cause to entertain an application for renewal even where it is delayed by more than 15 days? section 29, sub- .....

K. Sathyabal and Others Vs. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, ...

Court : Chennai

..... a punishment imposed upon the professionals, especially since an interim prohibitory order passed against a professional cannot be equated to the suspension of a government servant or a worker. 12. however, the state bar council, the bar council of india as well as the chairmen of the respective councils, who are the respondents herein oppose ..... for more than 100 days. they have filed affidavits, assuring that the lawful functioning of the cisf in the high court will not be disturbed by any act on their part, which may cause interference with the smooth functioning of the administration of justice. but, what tantamount to the lawful functioning of the cisf and ..... a separate definition provided for the said expression. that it is so, can be understood by looking at some other provisions. 25. section 10(1) of the act empowers the state bar council to constitute two standing committees. sub-section (2) of section 10 empowers the bar council of india to constitute two standing committees. sub .....

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

..... not driven; and his will must be the offspring of his own volition, and not the record of some one else's." section 61 of the indian succession act (act 39 of 1925) enacts that, "a will or any part of a will, the making of which has been caused by fraud or coercion, or by such importunity ..... subsisting rent agreement, lease agreement or licence agreement in his favour." (m) 2008 (14) scc 754 (babu singh vs. ram sahai): "16. section 69 of the act (evidence act) reads, thus: "69. proof where no attesting witness found. if no such attesting witness can be found, or if the document purports to have been executed in the ..... require, mean and include their respective heirs, administrators, executors, legal representatives and assigns of the one part and lakshmi builders, a partnership firm, registered under the indian partnership act and having its office at 625, mount road, madras-6 and represented herein by its partner... p.g.saranyan, hereinafter referred to as the "confirming party", which .....