Motion - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: motion Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 305 results (0.091 seconds)Suo Motu Vs. Registrar, High Court of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: May-01-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Guj388; (2002)2GLR1649
j m panchal j 1 the learned single judge has referred following two issues for consideration of the division bench...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Suo Motu Action by the High Court of Judicature at Patna; in Re ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-10-2002
..... of the case show mere adjournment were being taken the inquiry which was set in motion by the state government was dragging the court was being indicated that the personnel who ..... be seen by any further inquiry or investigation this record will be available thus the suo motu action succeeds with directions as above 17 it will be only appropriate that a copy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2002
Reported in: 2002(64)DRJ418; [2002(94)FLR408]; (2002)IIILLJ424Del
devinder gupta j 1 this matter arose pursuant to suo motu notice taken by us in relation to the then...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2002
Reported in: 2002VIAD(Delhi)197; 98(2002)DLT585
devinder gupta j 1 three delinquents lalit manoj and rajesh havebeen produced by inspector rajeshwar kumar sho p s mukherjee...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuo Motu Reference in the Matter of Divorce Act
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-01-2002
Reported in: II(2002)DMC753
b n srikrishna c j 1 this reference has been made for judicial determination of the following questions which vitally...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarendrakumar Khandelwal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-2002
Reported in: (2003)180CTR(MP)553; [2003]259ITR593(MP)
s l kochar j 1 the applicants are hereby taking exception to the order of conviction passed by the additional...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nand Manahor Agencies
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-2002
Reported in: [2003]259ITR723(MP)
1 this is an application under section 256 2 of the income tax act 1961 for calling for a reference...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Ramasamy Vs. State of T.N. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-12-2002
Reported in: JT2002(5)SC479
order1 leave granted 2 these are appeals against the judgment of the high court of madras interfering with an award...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Saluja Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-28-2002
Reported in: 2002VIIAD(Delhi)536; 2002(1)ARBLR557(Delhi); 96(2002)DLT628; 2002(62)DRJ11
j d kapoor j 1 on filing the petition under section 14 of thearbitration act 1940 for making the award...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBumbrah Electric Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2002
Reported in: 2002IIAD(Delhi)753; 2003(1)ARBLR421(Delhi); 97(2002)DLT130; 2002(62)DRJ213
j d kapoor j 1 there is no gainsaying the fact that thearbitrator is an instrument of the agreement and...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial