Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motion of thanks Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 64,906 results (0.071 seconds)

Feb 26 1965 (HC)

Syed Abdul Mansur Habibullah Vs. the Speaker, West Bengal Legislative ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal363,69CWN484

..... on such day or days or part of any day, the house shall be at liberty to discuss the matters referred to in such address on a motion of thanks moved by a member and seconded by another member 18. ..... on such report being made notice may he given of a motion that a respectful address be presented to the governor in reply to his speech expressing the thanks of the assembly for the speech delivered by him. 4. ..... (2) the discussion on the address may be postponed in favour of a government bill or other government business on a motion being made that the discussion on the address be adjourned to a subsequent day to be appointed by the speaker. ..... by the distribution, to the members of the legislature, of copies of printed address by the governor, but the constitution, in its wisdom, has provided for delivery of a speech by the governor in person, so that the informative speech may be discussed on a motion of 'respectful address' to the governor, expressing the views of the legislature on the address. ..... amendment may be moved to such motion by way of adding additional words at the end but not otherwise, on such notice being given as the speaker may determine. 19. ..... the speaker shall forthwith put the question, no amendment or debate being allowed, (3) the discussion on the address shall be interrupted in the course of a sitting by an adjournment motion under rule 64. 20. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1966 (HC)

Yogendra Nath Handa and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj123

..... persuaded to entertain that matter in the exercise of our discretionary powers under article 226 of the constitution and our reasons are three-fold: firstly, the petitioners and some other members have already moved a motion for breach of privilege by the governor which, according to the petitioners, is still receiving the consideration of the speaker; secondly, the petitioners themselves have been found to be in the wrong box inasmuch as they have been expelled ..... by shri ram prasad ladha and which was passed by the assembly for expulsion of the petitioners for remaining part of the session was illegal and without jurisdiction.in the alternative it is urged that even if such a motion could have been moved before the house, it was necessary for the house to first consider the question as to whether the governor had committed any impropriety or illegality in taking the law in his own hands ..... on 3rd march, 1966, one of the members of the assembly moved a motion of thanks for the governor for his address. ..... rule 16 provides for amendments that may be moved for such motion of thanks. ..... a motion of thanks moved by a member and seconded by another member. ..... it is averred that in this way 12 members of the assembly were removed from the assembly hall under orders of the governor.thereafter, it is alleged, that on a motion by shri maharawal laxman singh, leader of the opposition group, a resolution was passed by the house that the address of the governor may be taken to have been read. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1969 (HC)

Jai Singh Rathi and ors. Vs. State of Haryana Through the Chief Secy. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H379

..... thing is apparent that is just this, that in spite of all what the petitioners have stated in their petition that respondent 2 was in danger of losing his majority, the fact of the matter is that the motion of thanks to the governor for his address was carried by the treasury benches on just a voice vote, the opposition not even claiming a division in this respect. ..... . the opposition had not the courage to challenge the government to a division on the motion of thanks to the address of the governor, which was carried in the house by voice vote; the opposition was defeated on the motion for suspension of rule 104 by nine votes; and it was defeated on the motion for actual suspension of the petitioners again by a margin of nine votes; and all the time the petitioners were ..... by law could not be exercised by the house; (b) that the suspension of rule 104 could not revest the power of suspension in the house; (c) that the motion of suspension of rule 104 was itself illegal being contrary to rule 121 as when that motion was moved, the motion for suspension of the petitioners was not before the house; (d) that the haryana state legislature cannot claim the power to suspend a member under article 194(3) ..... thereupon the chief minister moved the motion of thanks to the governor, which was carried by voice vote and the house rose ..... the amendment to the motion of thanks was moved by the opposition (shri roop lal mehta), but ..... the motion of thanks was put to vote and the same was carried .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1981 (HC)

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... petitioner, much less his fundamental right, was involved merely because he had an option to attend the parliament is obedience to the summons issued by the president under article 85(1), or to hear his address and vote for or against the motion of thanks under article 86(1) ..... . a legislator may give his assent to a particular motion either by uttering the necessary words from his mouth, or by merely lifting his hand and each of these forms of demonstration will tantamount to speech or expression ..... thereafter, shri malik mohi-ud-din was elected as speaker of the assembly on 8-9-1977 and continued to discharge his duties as such till 11-10-1980 when he was removed from office following a 'no confidence motion' moved against him.2. ..... . there can, therefore, be no manner of doubt that clause (a) of section 24-g does imperil the right of a legislator to say whatever he likes to say in the house or to vote for or against a motion moved in it as he likes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1989 (HC)

S.R. Bommai and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant5; ILR1989KAR2425

..... in the same session, a motion of thanks was also passed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1994 (SC)

S.R. Bommai and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others Etc. Et ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC1918; JT1994(2)SC215; 1994(2)SCALE37; (1994)3SCC1; [1994]2SCR644

..... passed the following order: 'since the matter is extremely urgent, we deem it fit to pass this further order asking the governor while taking any decision on the question whether the government has lost the motion of confidence and lost its majority in the house, to take into account, the two earlier orders dated 6.9.1991 and 3.10.1991 of this court and also to take into account how the aforesaid four appellant ..... , election of speaker and deputy speaker, vote of confidence/no-confidence in the ministry, motion of thanks to the president after the address by the president and so on. ..... thereafter, declaring that there was a tie in voting, he cast his own vote against the motion and declared that the motion had failed and adjourned the house sine die. ..... , 26 plus four independent mlas who had voted for the motion, continued to stay in the house and elected the speaker from amongst themselves to conduct the business. ..... however, instead of announcing the result of the voting on the motion, the speaker declared that he had received a complaint against five independent mlas of the ruling coalition front alleging that they were disqualified as legislators under the anti-defection law and since they had ..... in other words, the election process once set in motion should run its full course and all election disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the procedure established by r.p. ..... the 26 members who had voted against the motion had, of course, left the house by that time. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2012 (HC)

Vijayakant. Vs. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly

Court : Chennai

..... an incident happened in the house of the state legislative assembly, when the discussion on the motion of thanks to the governor's address was in progress. ..... member is so named by the speaker, the speaker, shall, on a motion being made forthwith without any discussion put the question that the member (naming him) be suspended from the service of the house for a period not exceeding the remainder of the session:provided that the house may, at any time, on a motion being made resolve that such suspension be terminated. ..... it reads as follows:-"(d) after the motion for consideration of the report has been carried, the chairman or any member of the committee or any other member as the case may be, move that the assembly agrees or disagrees, or agrees with ..... whose translated version is given by the petitioner himself, reads as follows:-"i did not speak anything with ulterior motive, while participating in the discussion of the house in session, on the resolution proposed for expressing thanks to the governor's address on 1.2.2012. ..... of the house moved a motion which was put to vote. ..... of the speaker under rule 121(2) is also made subject to the proviso under sub-rule (2) which enables the house to terminate the suspension by a resolution passed on a motion made in that behalf. ..... and the passing of the resolution all happened in a span of few hours at break-neck speed and (ii) that even without furnishing copies of the report to all the members of the house, the motion was carried through.36. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2013 (HC)

R.Veeramani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... during the pendency of the writ petition filed by dr.g.krishnamurthy, the present development took place and the legislative session was conducted at fort st.george, the governor's address was made, and motion of thanks was also passed. ..... if the motion of thanks was approved in the assembly, then it is a valid decision taken by the government. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1889 (FN)

Reynes Vs. Dumont

Court : US Supreme Court

..... " "on motion, it is further" " resolved that the board hereby tender their thanks for the aid he is individually lending by leaving undisturbed a large cash balance ($80,000) eighty thousand dollars, standing to the credit of c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1952 (HC)

Saradhakar Supakar Vs. Speaker, Orissa Legislative Assembly and Secret ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1952Ori284

..... march had been fixed for the administration of oath to the members, the 6th march for the election of the speaker, and the 7th march for the address of his excellency the governor to be followed by a motion 'that a respectful address be presented to his excellency in reply to his speech, expressing the thanks of the assembly for the speech delivered by him. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //