More - Judgment Search Results

Sunita @ Kavita Vivekanand More (Sou.) Vs. Vivekanand Shripati More an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(5)BomCR232; II(2001)DMC693

..... their childhood and because of the promise on behalf of vivekanand more that he would marry her there developed a physical relationship ..... solapur dated 30th june 1992 is restored respondent no 1 vivekanand more is directed to comply with the order of the judicial ..... childhood and because of the promise on behalf of vivekanand more that he would marry her there developed a physical relationship between .....

Jitendra @ Jitu Sakharam More and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)1175; 2001(5)BomCR172

..... no 930 of 1998 has been preferred by appellant jitendra sakharam more and nitesh mahadeo kasare criminal appeal no 66 of 1999 ..... judge however erred in convicting the appellants alex joseph jitendra more vinod jadhav and agnelia fernandes for the offence under section ..... the colleges directly effect notified candidates who have questioned it more than often as their admission process is not so just fair .....

Vinayak V. More Etc. Vs. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporatio ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2000(2)ALLMR511

..... gazette specify in this behalf but so however that not more than the capital cost of such construction reconstruction or repairs ..... empowered to levy and collect tolls however limited to not more than the capital cost of such construction reconstruction or repairs ..... in mumbai with the resulted problems like increase in pollution more time needed to travel increase in consumption of petrol etc .....

P.M. More Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribuna ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR228]; (2001)IIILLJ689Bom

..... terminated were accorded employment by the employer accordingly but the present workman and one more workman namely g v nilvarna were neither reinstated nor employed by the employer ultimately ..... reinstatement to petitioner petition filed challenging award of industrial tribunal petitioner workman worked for more than 240 days preceding date of termination provisions of section 25f were not complied .....

Kajaria Iron Castings Ltd. Vs. Aswini Kumar More

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2002)10SCC292

..... of justice would be met if the appellant is given one more opportunity to file the written statement we accordingly set aside ..... the order under challenge and grant the appellant one more opportunity to file the written statement within two weeks time from ..... appellant by courts below mdash in the interest of justice one more opportunity to file the written statement within 2 weeks time granted .....

Nirmal Suryaji More and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(4)MPHT284; 2000(3)MPLJ599

..... also contended that an application was also filed by the applicant no 1 nirmal suryaji more and in similar terms an order was also passed on 1 12 1998 by this ..... in spite of the directions passed by the supreme court on 19 4 1999 and more than six months have elapsed it is further submitted that the matter is at the .....

Kantilal Alias Chandrakant Shrirang More Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)1

..... on the neck of vishwas resulting in his instantaneous death 3 the evidence of mohandas more the younger brother of vishwas shows that at about 3 p m one raju honrao .....

R. Maheshwari and Others Vs. Karnataka State Transport Authority, Bang ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: II(2001)ACC608; 2001(3)KarLJ212

..... the inter state agreement and exemption also provided under the kolar pocket scheme allowing one more vehicle on the route would yield a revenue to the state government exchequer about rs ..... permit granted under the old act and the andhra pradesh authority have permitted one more trip with one more vehicle subject to counter signature by karnataka government the karnataka government has now .....

Santaandnbsp;fe Independent School Dist. Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... differs dramatically from attendance at high school football games which it contends are of no more than passing interest to many students and are decidedly extracurricular thus dissipating any coercion ..... and we were presented with the appropriate record our language in southworth could become more applicable in fact southworth itself demonstrates the impropriety of making a decision with respect .....

Geier Vs. American Honda Motor Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to encourage manufacturers to comply with the standard by installing airbags and other perhaps more effective nonbelt technologies that they might develop rather than by installing less expensive ..... period had as the secretary hoped ultimately encouraged manufacturers to develop a nonbelt system more effective than the airbag manufacturers held liable for failing to install passive restraints .....