Skip to content


Modify - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: modify Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 454 results (0.04 seconds)
Mar 18 2005 (HC)

Man Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-18-2005

Reported in: 2005CriLJ3369

mehtab s gill j 1 by this common judgment we shall be disposing of criminal appeal bearing nos 78 db...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 08 2005 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-08-2005

Reported in: I(2006)DMC466

mehtab s gill j 1 this is an appeal against the judgment order dated 5 3 1997 of the sessions...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2005 (HC)

Prem Nath and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-07-2005

Reported in: 2005CriLJ2244; II(2005)DMC464

mehtab s gill j 1 criminal appeal no 740 db of 2002 has been filed against the judgment dated 10...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 2005 (HC)

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-01-2005

Reported in: 2006CriLJ17

mehtab s gill j 1 this is an appeal against the judgment order dated 1 6 2004 of the additional...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 2005 (HC)

Surjit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-06-2005

Reported in: II(2005)DMC597

undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year 22 with the above modifications in conviction and sentence appeal is dismissed appellants if on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 2005 (HC)

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-17-2005

Reported in: 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

..... modification in the official gazette the final development plan shall be deemed to have been modified accordingly 1 b notwithstanding anything contained in sub section 1 if the slum rehabilitation ..... and the said architect the said architect prepared an integrated development scheme as per the modified dc regulation 2001 which envisages multi mill aggregation sale of some mill land modernisation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2005 (TRI)

Gadadhar Bania and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Decided on: May-31-2005

Reported in: (2005)(3)SLJ225CAT

..... located for reasons of operational considerations alone and are not living in cantonments modified field area modified field area is an area where troops are deployed in support of combat ..... i e filed service concessions allowance includes compensatory field area allowance cfaa or compensatory modified field area allowance cmfaa the tribunal shall be required to consider whether these allowances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 2005 (TRI)

S.S. Organics Limited and V.N. Vs. B. Subba Reddy

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Sep-20-2005

Reported in: (2006)132CompCas92

..... with the requirements of section 81 1a while allotting rs 250 lakhs pursuant to the modified approved scheme while the petitioner is challenging the impugned allotment before the clb the ..... further there was no requirement of any resolution under section 81 1a for the modified sanctioned scheme the modified sanctioned scheme stipulates that sebi and stock exchanges will exempt the company its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 2005 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Pranabesh Kumar Samanta and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-14-2005

Reported in: 2005(4)CHN802,(2006)IILLJ129Cal

..... when because subsequent enhancement of retirement age from 58 to 60 years the respondent had modified such scheme extending further benefit to the applicants under the voluntary retirement scheme they certainly ..... petitioners had already retired they would still be entitled to get the benefit of the modified scheme learned counsel pointed out that an absurd situation would be obtained where two .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2005 (FN)

Ballard Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-07-2005

..... the 1983 amendments however the tax court stopped acknowledging instances in which it rejected or modified special trial judge findings instead it appears that the tax court inaugurated a novel practice ..... ibid in practice however the tax court stopped acknowledging instances in which it rejected or modified special trial judge findings judge cudahy in dissent in the seventh circuit commented on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //