Modernization - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: modernization Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 318 results (0.005 seconds)Mrs. Magan Verma Vs. Modern Syntex (India) Ltd. and Another
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Aug-20-2001
..... 001454 dated 30 11 1996 bearing folio no 0001182 of respondent no 1 m s modern syntex india ltd with its regd office a 4 vijay path tilak nagar jaipur 302004 ..... nsil ag 99 folio 1182 dated 12th march 1999 by respondent no 2 m s modern syntex india ltd wherein it has been clearly mentioned that the rate of interest payable .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Modern Denim Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-29-2001
Reported in: (2002)(148)ELT124Tri(Mum.)bai
1 this appeal from revenue was argued by shri george the respondents were not present on earlier occasions also the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Modern Bakeries India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-11-2001
Reported in: [2001]249ITR465(Delhi); [2001]117TAXMAN737(Delhi)
arijit pasayat c j 1 this order will govern income tax references nos 283 of 1981 and 284 of 1981...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Syntax (i) Ltd. Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal Jaipur and Others
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-14-2001
Reported in: AIR2001Raj170; [2001]106CompCas629(Raj); 2001(2)WLC79; 2003(1)WLN620
..... annexure 5 to the writ petition moved by the petitioner modern syntax for dismissing the original recovery application in view of ..... to the industrial undertaking located in the state of gujrat namely modern petrofils division baroda gujrat 13 on receipt of the notice ..... itself wherein only contribution had been made towards capital of modern syntax india ltd which has been mentioned in the very .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Threads (i) Ltd. Vs. Dinesh Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2001
..... west district forum no iii in complaint no 4357 1998 titled dinesh kumar aggarwal v modern threads i ltd whereby appellant was directed to pay rs 4 608 to the complainant ..... the district forum iii passed in complaint no 4357 1998 titled dinesh kumar aggarwal v modern threads i ltd is set aside any grievance about non payment according to the schedule .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Terry Towels Ltd. Vs. R.K. Singh
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-29-2001
..... and 1548 1999 entitled shri r k singh v m s modern terry towels ltd and ms savitri v m s modern terry towels ltd respectively 2 the relevant facts in brief .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Marketing Agencies Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Sep-11-2001
Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT399Tri(Chennai)
..... submissions and citations which is reproduced herein below it is respectfully submitted that m s modern marketing agencies secunderabad ap are traders in ball bearings they imported from singapore ball ..... department did not produce evidence to establish under valuation 4 there is no relationship between modern marketing and the suppliers 5 there was no justification in lower authority is assessing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Woolens Mills Ltd. Vs. Judge, Labour Court, Jaipur and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-16-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)WLN427
verma j 1 the petitioner modern woolen mills ltd hereinafter to be referred as employer has filed this writ petition against .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern Educational Society Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALD759; 2002(1)ALT227
a r lakshmanan c j 1 this writ appeal is directed against the order dated 1 11 2001 in w...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModern theatres Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: [2002(94)FLR1148]; (2002)IIILLJ41Mad
r jayasimha babu j 1 the contention of the employer petitioner is that even after the expiry of the period...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial