Mo - Judgment Search Results

Muthu Vs. State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2001CriLJ2269

..... 8 and on being pointed pw 13 questioned pw 8 who then produced mo 13 a nose screw belonging to the deceased which was seized under a ..... proceeding towards a casuarina thope and at that time the deceased was wearing mos 2 and 3 next day she heard people talking that the dead body ..... act 17 in this case though he was specifically asked about his selling mo 13 the nose screw to pw 8 a1 had no explanation to .....

Nixon Vs. Shrink Missouri Government Pac

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to restrict the permissible amounts of contributions to candidates for state office mo rev stat 130 032 1994 before the statute became effective however ..... than the candidate in anyone election shall not exceed one thousand dollars mo rev stat 130 032 1 1 1998 cum supp the statutory ..... government pac v adams 5 f supp 2d 734 737 ed mo 1998 384 tention that inflation since buckley s approval of a .....

Beck Vs. Prupis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a right of action chapman v pollock 148 f supp 769 772 wd mo 1957 holding that a plaintiff who charged the defendants with conspiring to ..... per curiam and chapman v pollock 148 f supp 769 772 wd mo 1957 to deny recovery for conspiracy because the defendants had not entered ..... a civil wrong chapman v pollock 148 f supp 769 772 wd mo 1957 the fatal defect in plaintiff s action for conspiracy is that .....

Dr. Aparna Sehgal and ors. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... conditions as are admissible to other regular medical officers homoeopathy mo h for short from the date of their appointment and ..... the respondents from discontinuing their services 2 applicants were appointed as mo h on contract basis with effect from 1997 on different ..... also other benefits of service conditions as are applicable to other mos h from the date of their initial appointment 10 with .....

Joseph S/O Kooveli Poulo Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000CriLJ2467; 2000(3)CTC306; JT2000(6)SC195; 2000(3)KLT381(SC); 2000(4)SCALE92; (2000)5SCC197

..... inmates of the convent holding different positions therein and all of them identified mos 1 to 3 as the ornaments belonging to the deceased gracy and ..... in question at angularly where the appellant was said to have taken mos 1 to 3 and sold them for rs 5 103 before actual ..... murder of gracy and for robbing her of her jewellery worn by her mos 1 to 3 under section 392 the deceased meekly went with the .....

Venkatachalaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2001CriLJ1433

..... to this there are also the circumstances regarding the recovery of the chopper mo 5 which was used in the commission of the offence at the instance ..... shirt in which the weapon was found to be wrapped is as per mo 9 39 under the cross examination he has further stated that the ..... as per40 wpws 11 and 12 are the panchas for the recovery of mos 5 and 9 at the instance of the accused and they have both .....

Stenberg Vs. Carhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... method of second trimester abortion id at 8 planned parenthood of central mo v danforth 428 u s 52 76 1976 today however the ..... abortion the court voided parental consent laws see planned parenthood of central mo v danforth 428 u s 52 75 1976 legislation requiring that second ..... not sufficient to create an undue burden in planned parenthood of central mo v danforth 428 u s 52 1976 the court struck down .....

Durga Prasad Jaiswal and anr. Vs. the State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD(Cri)321; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)107; 2000CriLJ2607

..... with ganja kept in two separate bags containing ten kgs and six kgs mos 1 2 are the two bags produced before him on that day ..... his presence and ganja was seized from the possession of the appellants in mos 1 2 under ex p1 p 2 respectively the appellants were taken ..... mandal revenue officer adilabad pw 3 along with the bags ganja contained in mos 1 2 was seized under exs p 1 and p 2 respectively .....

K. Venkatesham and anr. Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(2)ALD(Cri)64; 2000CriLJ3156

..... 3 the prosecution examined five witnesses and marked exs pi to p5 and material objects mos 1 to 48 the accused neither examined any witnesses nor marked any documents on their ..... for one year each the case properties mos 20 to 38 were directed to be disposed of mo 39 shall be confiscated to the state and mos 1 to 19 shall be destroyed .....

Gyan Singh (Dr.) and ors. Vs. National Institute of Health and Family ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)242; 86(2000)DLT595; 2000(54)DRJ908

..... 6 medical officers now in nihfw the benefits of in situ promotion from mos to smos rs 3000 4500 and then to cmo rs 3700 5000 after ..... 6 medical officers now in nihfw the benefits of in situ promotion from mos to smos rs 3000 4500 and then to cmo rs 3700 5000 after ..... body has simply approved to extend the benefits of in situ promotion from mos to smos and then to cmos after 4 years and 6 years of .....