Mitigating - Judgment Search Results

Satish Chandra Khandelwal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1983Delhi1; ILR1981Delhi917

..... and examines the legal requirement the compulsion behind the actions and omission the justification and mitigation thereforee and the totality of circumstances in which they had been committed keeping in view .....

Ranchhod and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1981(3)SCALE1802; (1982)1SCC436; 1982(14)LC67(SC)

..... death works well and it produces results gene rally regarded as satisfactory it helps in mitigating the rigour of the death sentence particularly in case of those murderers whose execution would .....

Bullington Vs. Missouri

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the same jury footnote 5 that found the defendant guilty and additional evidence in extenuation mitigation and aggravation of punishment shall be heard only such evidence in aggravation as the ..... hearing subject to the laws of evidence the jury shall hear additional evidence in extenuation mitigation and aggravation of punishment including the record of any prior criminal convictions and pleas .....

Mccray Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the sentence at the conclusion of the hearing the jury considers whether sufficient mitigating circumstances exist which outweigh the aggravating circumstances found to exist and based ..... affirmance of that decision a reasonable jury unquestionably could have concluded that the mitigating circumstances outweighed the aggravating circumstances petitioner offered substantial evidence in support of his .....

Rodriguez Vs. Compass Shipping Co., Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... recovery as explained by congressman zelenko the bill s author these provisions were designed to mitigate the problems identified in justice black s dissenting opinion in ryan stevedoring footnote 24 ..... after accepting compensation similarly to the extent that czaplicki and its progeny sought to mitigate the conflict of interest created by ryan stevedoring the 1972 amendments eliminate the need .....

Nagappaiah and Etc. Vs. Bhaskara and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1982Kant183; [1983]54CompCas551a(Kar); ILR1981KAR1352

..... the petition when the lorry was going at a distance of 3 miles from mitigate and proceeding towards kadur at about 11 30 p m another lorry bearing no ..... of the lorries mys 7557 and mys 6571 at 11 30 p m near mitigate village on 4 5 6 1976 due to rash and negligent driving of ..... very much in dispute that the accident did occur when the lorries were near mitigate in the night at about 11 30 p m on 4 5 6 .....

K.G. Prabhavathi and ors. Vs. K. Nirmala and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas670(Kar)

..... the motor cycle were equally responsible for causing the accident in that view instead of mitigating the damages to that extent in each case the tribunal dismissed both the petitions stating ..... tribunal had dismissed the claim petition this court has ruled thus the tribunal could only mitigate the liability of the drivers to each other to the extent to fifty per cent .....

Estelle Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the effective assistance of counsel and his eighth amendment right to present complete evidence of mitigating circumstances id at 664 page 451 u s 461 the united states court of appeals ..... the joint opinion announcing the judgment emphasized that a defendant is free to present whatever mitigating factors he may be able to show e g the range and severity of his .....

T.G. Srinivasa Murthy, Etc., Etc. Vs. Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. Etc., E ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1982KAR622; (1982)ILLJ268Kant

..... reasons i do not think that sparing use of the rule can in any way mitigate the vice inherent in the rule 6 the statement furnishing the extract of the rules ..... reason i do not think that sparing use of the rule can in any way mitigate the vice inherent in the rule 6 the statement furnishing the extract of the rule .....

Fedorenko Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decision the court held that even assuming misrepresentation of material facts equitable and mitigating circumstances the inconclusiveness of the evidence that petitioner had committed war crimes ..... court held that even assuming that petitioner had misrepresented material facts equitable and mitigating circumstances required that petitioner be permitted to retain his citizenship specifically the .....