Skip to content


Mistake - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: mistake Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 1,462 results (0.034 seconds)
Sep 21 2001 (HC)

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-21-2001

Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

..... that the examiners paper setters have reduced the minutes of the meeting by admitting their mistake expressing their regret for the inadvertent error and by tendering their sincere apology for the ..... of convenience of all concerned including the candidates so also to avoid any confusion and mistakes by granting double admissions etc the respondents have decided to cancel all the admissions so .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 2001 (TRI)

Telco Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Oct-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT392Tri(Kol.)kata

..... preliminary objection of the nature concerned herein certainly amounts to a mistake apparent from the record as stated hereinbefore where the tribunal ..... of the appeal it must be deemed to be a mistake apparent from the record which empowers the tribunal to reopen ..... orders the power conferred on the tribunal regarding rectification of mistake does not contemplate a re hearing which would have the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2001 (TRI)

Binani Zinc Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-30-2001

..... his contention that subsequent amendment having retrospective operation is a ground for rectification of mistake developing the arguments sri parameswaran submitted that not only section 38a was inserted under ..... in the finance act 2001 accordingly application filed by the parties for rectification of mistake are hereby allowed in view of this rectification order the respective appeals which were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2001 (TRI)

Obron Impex Private Limited, L.D. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-30-2001

Reported in: (2001)(137)ELT843Tri(Mum.)bai

..... that in terms of the section if there is a mistake that mistake must be apparent from perusal of that record and any ..... of attachment etc pending disposal of the applications for rectification of mistake on hearing shri v sridharan advocate appearing along with shri ..... section 154 of the income tax act permits rectification of mistake committed by an income tax officer in assessment or refund .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 2001 (TRI)

Richardson and Cruddas Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-09-2001

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT168Tri(Mum.)bai

..... appeal before us the rectification application subsequently filed by the appellant urged rectification of a mistake of the bench in not considering the ground contained in the memorandum of appeal but ..... whether the failure to argue this point contained in the memorandum of appeal is a mistake the departmental representative contended that it appears to us initially rightly that this would give .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2001 (HC)

Popular Engineering Co. Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-31-2001

Reported in: (2001)168CTR(P& H)55; [2001]248ITR577(P& H)

..... whether an order made under section 254 1 suffers from a mistake apparent from the record warranting its rectification under section 254 2 ..... various high courts in the country held that rectification of a mistake should not amount to review or rewriting of the previous ..... conferred under section 254 2 on the tribunal for rectifying any mistake apparent from the record cannot be exercised to recall any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2001 (TRI)

Cosmosteels (P) Ltd. and Others Vs. C.C. Calcutta

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Feb-07-2001

Reported in: (2001)(138)ELT660Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the apparent error from the records and should not be a mistake requiring elaborate reasining to establish or investigations to discover a ..... availing the remedy under the law the powers for rectification of mistake are limited and review of the order for which the ..... sure about the number and so the application for rectification of mistake is sustainable in view of the difference of opinion expressed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2001 (HC)

Cit Vs. Aruna Luthra

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-31-2001

Reported in: (2001)170CTR(P& H)73

..... power given to the authority is wide it can correct any mistake provided it is apparent from the record the first question that ..... arises for consideration iswhen can a mistake be said to be apparent from the record the plain language ..... to section 35 of the act which provides for rectification of mistakes the power is given to the various income tax authorities within .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 2001 (HC)

Karan and Co. Vs. Itat

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-20-2001

Reported in: (2001)169CTR(Del)361

..... impression that court proceedings contrary to record and thus constitute a mistake apparent from the record to this extent the order of the ..... original assessment proceedings are contrary to record and thus constituted a mistake apparent from record to this extent the order of the ..... means visible capable of being seen easily seen obvious plain a mistake which can be rectified under section 254 2 is one .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 11 2001 (HC)

Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Vs. Oswal Solven Extract ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-11-2001

Reported in: AIR2002Mad35

..... the formation of contracts may be of three kinds namely unilateral mistake mutual mistake and common mistake in a case of unilateral mistake only one of the contracting parties is mistaken and the other ..... be held that there was no contract at all between the parties because of the mistake of fact and would ultimately hold that under such circumstances the plaintiff cannot come forward .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //