Missing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: missing Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.061 seconds)Miss Laila Chacko and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Ker124
..... as one of the four subjects under the medical group provided the candidate passes the missing subjects in the medical group after undergoing the intensive course this interpretation of the ordinance ..... ofotherwise by this judgment no costs degree 3 years course examination and bad passed the missing subjects of zoology and botany by undergoing the intensive course in these subjects is eligible .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiss Saroj Nayudu Vs. Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-1966
Reported in: [1967]64ITR637(Bom)
abhyankar j this order deciding common question will dispose of both these petitions in order to understand the nature of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-31-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC614; [1967]63ITR651(SC); [1967]2SCR1
bhargava j 1 this appeal by certificate granted by the high court of bombay under section 66a 2 of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxman Sitaram Pai and anr. Vs. the State of Mysore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-02-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Kant33; AIR1967Mys33; (1966)1MysLJ569
..... against them that is being challenged in this revision petition by miss anasuya the learned counsel for the petitioners 6 before the ..... and sentence of the accused petitioners 7 now in this court miss anasuya appearing for the petitioners has urged the same four points ..... framed under the act 19 however in support of her contention miss anasuya relies on the decision reported in air1964guj136 state of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPalaniswamy Vaiyapuri Vs. State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-17-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Bom127; (1966)68BOMLR941; 1968CriLJ453
..... who was later on identified as palaniammal was treated in the hospital by dr miss acharya dr miss acharya noted down the symptoms on a sheet of paper known as surgical medical ..... excepting the statements of bhaskar tukaram jadhave rajamani rajarathnam sambhandhan kumaraswamy thorat dr shivamrutam sushila miss kasturi and copies of the three panchanamas have you furnished copies of any other statements .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAkkipeddi Gopalasastry Vs. Vijayawada Engineering Metal Co. Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-21-1966
Reported in: AIR1968AP41
..... number of machinery parts originally entrusted to the defendant were found missing when they were taken delivery of by the plaintiff the ..... examination the defendant has not been able to establish that the missing parts were never entrusted to him originally we have therefore ..... the machinery and that he was therefore liable to return the missing parts or their value 8 coming to the question of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVafati Gokul Vs. the State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-26-1966
Reported in: (1966)7GLR1114
..... criminal appeal no 1000 of 1963 on 28th october 1966 15 miss shah further contended that the order of summary dismissal of ..... memo and the arguments summarily dismissed the appeal this contention of miss shah therefore cannot be accepted 16 in view of foregoing conclusions ..... was that this application was clearly beyond the period of limitation miss shah wanted to take advantage of section 5 of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJai Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-1966
Reported in: 1967CriLJ628
..... deep on the right index finger back aspect skin over the wound missing 4 lacerated wound 3 l0 xl l0 x skin deep along with ..... were mixing up facts when they staled that they knew about the missing of the transistor even before the first information was laid in the ..... of the case the fact that no investigation was directed towards the missing of the transistor till the arrest of jai singh has no importance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJai Singh Vs. the State
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-18-1966
..... deep on the right index finger back aspect skin over the wound missing 4 lacerated wound 3110 x 1 10 x skin deep along ..... were mixing up facts when they stated that they knew about the missing of the transistor even before the first information was lodged in the ..... of the case the fact that no investigation was directed towards the missing of the transistor till the arrest of jai singh has no importance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJai Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-18-1966
..... 10 x skin deep on front of nose skin over the wound missing 2 bruising of both lips in its whole length on inner surface ..... were mixing up facts when they stated that they knew about the missing of the transistor even before the first information was laid the case ..... of the case in fact that no investigation was directed towards the missing of the transistor till the arrest of jai singh has no importance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial