Skip to content


Misinterpretation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: misinterpretation Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 111 results (0.003 seconds)
Mar 12 2003 (SC)

Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur Vs. Alcobex Metals

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-12-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC3431; 2003(86)ECC533; 2003(153)ELT241(SC); JT2003(3)SC312; 2003(3)SCALE321; (2003)4SCC630; [2003]2SCR1057

..... order of the district judge since he had failed to exercise his jurisdiction on a misinterpretation of the statute and erroneous view of limitation joy chand lal babu v kamalaksha choudhury .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 2003 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Affection Investments Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Feb-19-2003

Reported in: (2003)80TTJ(Ahd.)278

..... to dodge the ever watchful eyes of law on the basis of misinterpretation of judgment of hon ble supreme court in the case of miss ..... in respect of short term capital loss claimed on the basis of misinterpretation of the judgment of the hon ble apex court in the case ..... of the share itself which includes such right on the basis of misinterpretation of the judgment of the hon ble supreme court in the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2003 (SC)

Collector of Central Excise, Baroda Vs. L.M.P. Precision Eng. Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-16-2003

Reported in: 2004(93)ECC137; 2004(163)ELT290(SC); (2004)9SCC703

..... requirement for disclosure was clear unambiguous and categoric there was no scope for misunderstanding or misinterpretation the respondent s reliance on diverse decisions of this court in which it was held ..... necessary to interpret a particular provision of law where the assessee had proceeded on a misinterpretation of a legal provision this court appears to have held that the bona fides could .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 2003 (HC)

Akula Ganga Raju and anr. Vs. Presiding Officer, Yeleswaram Mandal Pra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-14-2003

Reported in: 2003(5)ALD619; 2004(5)ALT563

..... proceedings issued by the 1st respondent are without any basis and they demonstrate a deliberate misinterpretation of the provisions and non application of mind according to him neither the act nor ..... member there cannot be any grater perversity of exercise of powers distortion of record and misinterpretation of rules than the one resorted to by the 1st respondent it was for this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 2003 (HC)

L.B.R. Industries, Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-09-2003

Reported in: [2003(4)JCR212(Jhr)]

..... 2003 thereafter the impugned letters were issued by the respondent authorities on the misconstruction and misinterpreting the orders passed by the supreme court in the case referred hereinabove 5 in wpc ..... t n gobardhan case learned counsel submitted that the state of jharkhand are misconstruing and misinterpreting the order dated 12 12 1996 and 4 3 1997 passed by the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2003 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Prakashchand Bansilal Kankaria,

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-25-2003

Reported in: 2004(1)MhLj806

..... order was brought to the notice of the special judge he has completely misunderstood and misinterpreted the provisions of the said order he has strangely observed that it is not the ..... it is totally against the provisions of law the learned special judge totally misconceived and misinterpreted the provisions of sections 20 and 21 of the order of 1975 cited before him .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2003 (HC)

K.R. Sulochana Devi and anr. Vs. Chairman, Railway Board and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-10-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)ALD332; 2003(6)ALT549

..... the claims irrespective of the financial condition of the family of the deceased employees the misinterpretation of that judgment was so alarming that within five years the supreme court in umesh ..... that the decision of this court in sushma gosain v union of india has been misinterpreted to the point of distortion the decision does not justify compassionate employment either as a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 2003 (HC)

Virendra Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-01-2003

Reported in: 2004(1)AWC6

..... passed the impugned order dated 24 11 2001 annexure 1 to the writ petition has misinterpreted the order of the division bench dated 17 4 2000 annexure 7 to the writ ..... the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous by the htgh court has been deliberately misinterpreted by the then city magistrate to mean that the petition had been dismissed on merits .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 2003 (HC)

Mamata Mohanty Vs. Chairman, Coal India Limited and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Apr-18-2003

Reported in: 96(2003)CLT13

..... court further held that the decision in smt sushma gosain s case supra has been misinterpreted to the point of distortion and the decision does not justify compassionate appointment either as ..... that the decision of the court in sushma gosain v union of india has been misinterpreted to the point of distortion the decision does not justify compassionate employment either as a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 25 2003 (SC)

Calcutta Gujrati Education Society and anr. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Cor ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-25-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC4278; JT2003(Suppl2)SC52; 2003(6)SCALE802; (2003)10SCC533

..... of unwork ability of the provisions is a total misconception of the provisions and their misinterpretation it is submitted that primary liability to pay tax is on the owner of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //