Misbranded - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Coca Cola Co. of Atlanta

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from atlanta georgia to chattanooga tennessee it was alleged that the product was adulterated and misbranded the allegation of adulteration was in substance that the product contained an added poisonous or ..... statute is entitled an act for preventing the manufacture sale or transportation of adulterated or misbranded or poisonous or deleterious foods drugs medicines and liquors etc in the case of .....

Kordel Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... charged by informations containing twenty counts of introducing or delivering for introduction into interstate commerce misbranded drugs he was tried without a jury found guilty and fined two hundred dollars ..... possible paragraph k has been inserted prohibiting the changing of labels so as to misbrand articles held for sale after interstate shipment mr justice black with whom mr justice .....

United States Vs. Sullivan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to another consignee but the language used by congress broadly and unqualifiedly prohibits misbranding articles held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce without regard to how ..... broad subdivision of the act presents different problems of interpretation neither the misbranded foods section nor the misbranded cosmetics section contains any provision directly comparable to 502 f which .....

Kanai Lal Dutta and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1991)2CALLT454(HC)

..... chief municipal health officer as per report of the public analyst the said sample was misbranded inasmuch as there was no declaration anywhere on the packet regarding the manufacturing date as ..... public analyst which stands superseded to show that the seized sample of chilli powder was misbranded the learned senior municipal magistrate should have discharged the petitioner in support of his argument .....

Ewing Vs. Mytinger and Casselberry, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the injury or damage of the purchaser or consumer and that therefore the preparation was misbranded when introduced into interstate commerce this was indeed the administrative finding behind eleven seizures ..... under this section involving the same claimant and the same issues of adulteration or misbranding such pending in two or more jurisdictions such pending proceedings upon application of the .....

Jagneswar Sen Gupta Vs. Gopal Chandra Saha

Court: Guwahati

..... the administrator to grant the sanction and on the question of misbranding the learned sessions fudge disagreed with the magistrate and held that ..... of food other than mustard oil and hence there was no misbranding 6 it is against these findings in appeal that the present ..... from the definition of adulteration when a person is charged for misbranding it is not necessary to have any proof of adulteration .....

Andhra Pradesh GraIn and Seed Merchants Association Etc. Etc. Vs. Unio ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC2346; 1971CriLJ1556; 1970(0)KLT23(SC); (1970)2SCC71; [1971]1SCR166

..... of the constitution are infringed 2 the parliament with a view to control adulteration and misbranding of articles of food enacted the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 the petitioners ..... matter or condiments clauses i and ix of section 2 define the expressions adulterated and misbranded 4 according to counsel for the petitioners the act imposes unreasonable restrictions because it creates .....

United States Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... compose again it is to be noticed that the cases of misbranding specifically mentioned and following the general words that we have ..... still further that by 4 the determination whether an article is misbranded is left to the bureau of chemistry of the department ..... united states pharmacopoeia or the national formulary and the offense of misbranding is committed if the package or label of such an article .....

M. Ajithkumar Vs. The State By

Court: Karnataka

..... 7 2 of the act and sentence passed is also for misbranding and not adulteration he would also vehemently contend that inside the ..... the charges leveled against the revision petitioner is also that he had misbranded and no charge is framed in respect of adulteration and both ..... the counsel would further contend that no notice was given regarding misbranding and the same is admitted by p w 1 in the .....

Corn Products Refining Co. Vs. Eddy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... law evidently the purpose of the requirement is to secure freedom from adulteration and misbranding the mischief of misbranding being that purchasers may be misled with respect to the wholesomeness or food ..... regulations of the state board of health may require to secure freedom from adulteration or misbranding these italicized words make a very substantial difference section 3 of the kansas act .....